东北亚短途海运市场结构研究

IF 2 Q3 BUSINESS Maritime Business Review Pub Date : 2021-06-07 DOI:10.1108/MABR-08-2020-0050
So-Young Park, Simon S. Woo, Polin Lai
{"title":"东北亚短途海运市场结构研究","authors":"So-Young Park, Simon S. Woo, Polin Lai","doi":"10.1108/MABR-08-2020-0050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nShort-sea shipping (SSS) plays an important role in regional transportation networks by supporting regional trade and improving inter-modality. In particular, countries in north-east Asia, such as China, South Korea and Japan have been served well by local SSS services. While SSS markets in Northeast Asia (NEA) have been developed by bilateral routes with sub-markets, the market structure of each sub-markets varies depending on concentration and competition levels as well as government intervention. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the market structure of SSS markets in the Northeast Asia.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nHerfindahl–Hirschman Index (HHI) and concentration ratio are adopted to measure the market concentration from 2013 to 2017 for SSS markets in NEA. Additionally, the balance between supply and demand is investigated by measuring the capacity utilisation factor (CUF) based on slot capacity.\n\n\nFindings\nThe market structure in the NEA SSS markets is influenced by firms’ behaviour under different levels of governmental intervention. Shipping firms in a market with more governmental intervention in market entry tend to focus on balancing supply and demand rather than increasing market share, whereas firms in a market with less intervention (and more competition) tend to increase their market share by pursuing efficient capacity management.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe period of data set is limited to 2013–2017. Furthermore, prices or revenue for specific routes are not available.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper sheds light on the market structure and behaviour of players in SSS market. In addition, the work has value to measure capacity utilisation based on slot capacity.\n","PeriodicalId":43865,"journal":{"name":"Maritime Business Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Market structure of short sea shipping in northeast Asia\",\"authors\":\"So-Young Park, Simon S. Woo, Polin Lai\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/MABR-08-2020-0050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nShort-sea shipping (SSS) plays an important role in regional transportation networks by supporting regional trade and improving inter-modality. In particular, countries in north-east Asia, such as China, South Korea and Japan have been served well by local SSS services. While SSS markets in Northeast Asia (NEA) have been developed by bilateral routes with sub-markets, the market structure of each sub-markets varies depending on concentration and competition levels as well as government intervention. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the market structure of SSS markets in the Northeast Asia.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nHerfindahl–Hirschman Index (HHI) and concentration ratio are adopted to measure the market concentration from 2013 to 2017 for SSS markets in NEA. Additionally, the balance between supply and demand is investigated by measuring the capacity utilisation factor (CUF) based on slot capacity.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe market structure in the NEA SSS markets is influenced by firms’ behaviour under different levels of governmental intervention. Shipping firms in a market with more governmental intervention in market entry tend to focus on balancing supply and demand rather than increasing market share, whereas firms in a market with less intervention (and more competition) tend to increase their market share by pursuing efficient capacity management.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe period of data set is limited to 2013–2017. Furthermore, prices or revenue for specific routes are not available.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis paper sheds light on the market structure and behaviour of players in SSS market. In addition, the work has value to measure capacity utilisation based on slot capacity.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maritime Business Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maritime Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/MABR-08-2020-0050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maritime Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/MABR-08-2020-0050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的短海航运通过支持区域贸易和改善多式联运方式,在区域运输网络中发挥着重要作用。特别是,中国、韩国和日本等东北亚国家得到了当地SSS服务的良好服务。虽然东北亚的SSS市场是通过与子市场的双边路线开发的,但每个子市场的市场结构因集中度和竞争水平以及政府干预而有所不同。本文旨在分析东北亚SSS市场的市场结构。设计/方法/方法采用赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数(HHI)和集中度比率来衡量2013年至2017年NEA SSS市场的市场集中度。此外,还通过测量基于插槽容量的容量利用率(CUF)来研究供需之间的平衡。发现NEA SSS市场的市场结构受到不同政府干预水平下企业行为的影响。在政府对市场进入干预较多的市场中,航运公司往往专注于平衡供需,而不是增加市场份额,而在干预较少(竞争较多)的市场中的公司往往通过追求高效的运力管理来增加市场份额。研究局限性/含义数据集的期限限制在2013-2017年。此外,具体路线的价格或收入不可用。原创性/价值本文揭示了SSS市场的市场结构和参与者的行为。此外,这项工作对基于插槽容量来衡量容量利用率具有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Market structure of short sea shipping in northeast Asia
Purpose Short-sea shipping (SSS) plays an important role in regional transportation networks by supporting regional trade and improving inter-modality. In particular, countries in north-east Asia, such as China, South Korea and Japan have been served well by local SSS services. While SSS markets in Northeast Asia (NEA) have been developed by bilateral routes with sub-markets, the market structure of each sub-markets varies depending on concentration and competition levels as well as government intervention. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the market structure of SSS markets in the Northeast Asia. Design/methodology/approach Herfindahl–Hirschman Index (HHI) and concentration ratio are adopted to measure the market concentration from 2013 to 2017 for SSS markets in NEA. Additionally, the balance between supply and demand is investigated by measuring the capacity utilisation factor (CUF) based on slot capacity. Findings The market structure in the NEA SSS markets is influenced by firms’ behaviour under different levels of governmental intervention. Shipping firms in a market with more governmental intervention in market entry tend to focus on balancing supply and demand rather than increasing market share, whereas firms in a market with less intervention (and more competition) tend to increase their market share by pursuing efficient capacity management. Research limitations/implications The period of data set is limited to 2013–2017. Furthermore, prices or revenue for specific routes are not available. Originality/value This paper sheds light on the market structure and behaviour of players in SSS market. In addition, the work has value to measure capacity utilisation based on slot capacity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Predictive modelling in the shipping industry: analysis from supply and demand sides Electric tugboat deployment in maritime transportation: detailed analysis of advantages and disadvantages Discovering supply chain operation towards sustainability using machine learning and DES techniques: a case study in Vietnam seafood Maritime logistics and digital transformation with big data: review and research trend Assessing risk dimensions in dry port projects: prioritization, interdependence and heterogeneity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1