使用计算机程序为非母语人士设计客观的阿拉伯语测试

M. Ismail
{"title":"使用计算机程序为非母语人士设计客观的阿拉伯语测试","authors":"M. Ismail","doi":"10.21111/at-tadib.v14i2.4824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary purpose of a language test is to provide a measure that we can interpret as an indicator of an individual's language ability. The most important consideration in designing and developing a language test is the use for which it is intended so that the most important quality of a language test is its usefulness. And the essential measurement qualities are reliability and construct validity. Reliability is often defined as the consistency of measurement. A reliable test score will be consistent across different characteristics of the testing situation. And the construct validity pertains to the meaningfulness and appropriateness of the interpretations that we make based on test scores. Computer scoring has the advantage of providing instant results and this feature can be exploited to create individualized assessments. Computers have been used for managing item banks, scoring multiple-choice responses, generating score reports, conducting statistical analysis, and storing testtakers records. These roles will continue to contribute to the efficiency of language testing. Computerbased assessments are generally conservative and tend to reflect what was already possible in paperbased (or face to face) assessment. The concern in computer-assisted testing appears to pose a question of whether or computer-assisted language testing is valid. Validity refers to the degree to which inference from and uses of test scores can be justified. Whenever language instruction is offered online, it makes sense for teachers to at least consider online assessment as well. The most efficient option for doing so is course management software that allows the teacher to construct language tests based on","PeriodicalId":55739,"journal":{"name":"AtTadib","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design objective tests using the computer program in developing the Arabic language for non-native speakers\",\"authors\":\"M. Ismail\",\"doi\":\"10.21111/at-tadib.v14i2.4824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The primary purpose of a language test is to provide a measure that we can interpret as an indicator of an individual's language ability. The most important consideration in designing and developing a language test is the use for which it is intended so that the most important quality of a language test is its usefulness. And the essential measurement qualities are reliability and construct validity. Reliability is often defined as the consistency of measurement. A reliable test score will be consistent across different characteristics of the testing situation. And the construct validity pertains to the meaningfulness and appropriateness of the interpretations that we make based on test scores. Computer scoring has the advantage of providing instant results and this feature can be exploited to create individualized assessments. Computers have been used for managing item banks, scoring multiple-choice responses, generating score reports, conducting statistical analysis, and storing testtakers records. These roles will continue to contribute to the efficiency of language testing. Computerbased assessments are generally conservative and tend to reflect what was already possible in paperbased (or face to face) assessment. The concern in computer-assisted testing appears to pose a question of whether or computer-assisted language testing is valid. Validity refers to the degree to which inference from and uses of test scores can be justified. Whenever language instruction is offered online, it makes sense for teachers to at least consider online assessment as well. The most efficient option for doing so is course management software that allows the teacher to construct language tests based on\",\"PeriodicalId\":55739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AtTadib\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AtTadib\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib.v14i2.4824\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AtTadib","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib.v14i2.4824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语言测试的主要目的是提供一种衡量标准,我们可以将其解释为个人语言能力的指标。在设计和开发语言测试时,最重要的考虑因素是它的用途,所以语言测试最重要的质量是它的有用性。其中最基本的测量质量是信度和结构效度。可靠性通常被定义为测量的一致性。一个可靠的测试分数将在不同的测试情况下保持一致。构念效度指的是我们根据测试分数做出的解释的意义和适当性。计算机评分具有提供即时结果的优势,并且可以利用这一功能创建个性化评估。计算机已被用于管理题库、对多项选择题进行评分、生成分数报告、进行统计分析和存储考生记录。这些角色将继续有助于提高语文测试的效率。基于计算机的评估通常是保守的,并且倾向于反映纸质(或面对面)评估已经可能实现的内容。对计算机辅助测试的关注似乎提出了一个问题,即计算机辅助语言测试是否有效。效度指的是对考试成绩的推断和使用是合理的。无论何时提供在线语言教学,教师至少也应该考虑在线评估。这样做的最有效的选择是课程管理软件,允许教师构建基于语言测试
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Design objective tests using the computer program in developing the Arabic language for non-native speakers
The primary purpose of a language test is to provide a measure that we can interpret as an indicator of an individual's language ability. The most important consideration in designing and developing a language test is the use for which it is intended so that the most important quality of a language test is its usefulness. And the essential measurement qualities are reliability and construct validity. Reliability is often defined as the consistency of measurement. A reliable test score will be consistent across different characteristics of the testing situation. And the construct validity pertains to the meaningfulness and appropriateness of the interpretations that we make based on test scores. Computer scoring has the advantage of providing instant results and this feature can be exploited to create individualized assessments. Computers have been used for managing item banks, scoring multiple-choice responses, generating score reports, conducting statistical analysis, and storing testtakers records. These roles will continue to contribute to the efficiency of language testing. Computerbased assessments are generally conservative and tend to reflect what was already possible in paperbased (or face to face) assessment. The concern in computer-assisted testing appears to pose a question of whether or computer-assisted language testing is valid. Validity refers to the degree to which inference from and uses of test scores can be justified. Whenever language instruction is offered online, it makes sense for teachers to at least consider online assessment as well. The most efficient option for doing so is course management software that allows the teacher to construct language tests based on
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Towards A Bully-Free Pesantren: The Role of Educational Management With Adaptive Psychology and Mental Health Interventions Implementasi Nilai-Nilai Islam dalam Pendidikan Jasmani dan Olahraga untuk Membentuk Karakter Ulul Albab Analysis of the Influence Physical Education on Character Development of Elementary School Students Ta'dib: Character Foundations in the Perspective of Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas The Concept of Spiritual-Based Character Education At Nusantara Beriman Islamic Boarding School Poleang Kendari, Southeast Sulawesi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1