自由的两个形而上学:康德与黑格尔论自由民主衰落时代的暴力与法律

Q2 Arts and Humanities Praktyka Teoretyczna Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.19195/prt.2022.1.9
Marcin Pańków
{"title":"自由的两个形而上学:康德与黑格尔论自由民主衰落时代的暴力与法律","authors":"Marcin Pańków","doi":"10.19195/prt.2022.1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article attempts to rethink the legacy of Kant and Hegel in light of the problematic of law, violence and universality. It is also an explication of this legacy in the context of two contemporary insights into historical fate of our Eurocentric civilization—of Achille Mbembe and of Susan Buck-Morss. First, I consider the Kantian foundation of Rechtstaat in the light of Benjamin’s classic Critique of Violence and Mbembe’s contemporary critique of colonial power. Then I propose a new account of the central concept of Hegel’s Logic—i.e. the transition from necessity to freedom— from the same perspective, supplemented with Derrida’s interpretation of Benjamin, and Žižek’s reading of Hegel. The dialectic of modality from Hegel’s Science of Logic seems to be an underappreciated thread in this respect, insofar as Hegel’s idea of universality or freedom is founded on his ontology and critique of law.","PeriodicalId":36093,"journal":{"name":"Praktyka Teoretyczna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two Metaphysics of Freedom: Kant and Hegel on Violence and Law in the Era of the Fall of Liberal Democracy\",\"authors\":\"Marcin Pańków\",\"doi\":\"10.19195/prt.2022.1.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article attempts to rethink the legacy of Kant and Hegel in light of the problematic of law, violence and universality. It is also an explication of this legacy in the context of two contemporary insights into historical fate of our Eurocentric civilization—of Achille Mbembe and of Susan Buck-Morss. First, I consider the Kantian foundation of Rechtstaat in the light of Benjamin’s classic Critique of Violence and Mbembe’s contemporary critique of colonial power. Then I propose a new account of the central concept of Hegel’s Logic—i.e. the transition from necessity to freedom— from the same perspective, supplemented with Derrida’s interpretation of Benjamin, and Žižek’s reading of Hegel. The dialectic of modality from Hegel’s Science of Logic seems to be an underappreciated thread in this respect, insofar as Hegel’s idea of universality or freedom is founded on his ontology and critique of law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Praktyka Teoretyczna\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Praktyka Teoretyczna\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19195/prt.2022.1.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Praktyka Teoretyczna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19195/prt.2022.1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图从法律问题、暴力问题和普遍性问题来重新思考康德和黑格尔的遗产。这也是在对我们以欧洲为中心的文明的历史命运的两个当代见解的背景下对这一遗产的解释——Achille Mbembe和Susan Buck Morss。首先,我从本雅明的经典《暴力批判》和姆本贝对殖民权力的当代批判的角度来思考《雷茨塔特》的康德基础。然后,我从同样的角度,以德里达对本雅明的解读和日耶克对黑格尔的解读为补充,对黑格尔逻辑的中心概念——即从必要到自由的转变——提出了一个新的解释。黑格尔《逻辑科学》中的形式辩证法在这方面似乎是一条被低估的线索,因为黑格尔的普遍性或自由观是建立在他的本体论和法律批判之上的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Two Metaphysics of Freedom: Kant and Hegel on Violence and Law in the Era of the Fall of Liberal Democracy
The article attempts to rethink the legacy of Kant and Hegel in light of the problematic of law, violence and universality. It is also an explication of this legacy in the context of two contemporary insights into historical fate of our Eurocentric civilization—of Achille Mbembe and of Susan Buck-Morss. First, I consider the Kantian foundation of Rechtstaat in the light of Benjamin’s classic Critique of Violence and Mbembe’s contemporary critique of colonial power. Then I propose a new account of the central concept of Hegel’s Logic—i.e. the transition from necessity to freedom— from the same perspective, supplemented with Derrida’s interpretation of Benjamin, and Žižek’s reading of Hegel. The dialectic of modality from Hegel’s Science of Logic seems to be an underappreciated thread in this respect, insofar as Hegel’s idea of universality or freedom is founded on his ontology and critique of law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Praktyka Teoretyczna
Praktyka Teoretyczna Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
„Na hałdach rosną ludzie”: literacka historia pogórniczych środowisk sprzymierzeńczych The Doomsday Economy: Colonial Violence, Environmental Catastrophe, and Burning Tires in Palestine Dialektyka natury i społeczeństwa przeciwko monizmowi. Esej recenzyjny z „Marx in the Anthropocene” Kohei Saita (2023, Cambridge University Press) Francuski atom a kapitał symboliczny Bourdieu Rewolucyjne siły reprodukcji? Esej recenzyjny wokół książki Stefanii Barci, „Forces of Reproduction: Notes for a Counter-Hegemonic Anthropocene” (2020, Cambridge University Press)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1