{"title":"他们怎么知道这是一首十四行诗?罗密欧与茱丽叶的邂逅与回归之美","authors":"Scott F. Crider","doi":"10.3366/MORE.2019.0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the formal properties of Romeo and Juliet's encounter-sonnet, and suggests that Shakespeare included the sonnet for readers he hoped would be repeat play-goers. There are two parts of the case: 1) The first part takes up Romeo and Juliet's first encounter and examines it as a sonnet, orienting the analysis of its poetics through a historicized understanding of poetic form, book culture and theatrical performance; 2) the second asks how a member of Shakespeare's own play audience would have known that the sonnet is one, arguing that s/he might not have without having read the play beforehand. The relationship between quarto-reading and play-going perhaps encouraged audiences to see the play again after reading it. The article concludes by defending the return to form in Shakespeare Studies.","PeriodicalId":41939,"journal":{"name":"MOREANA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How did they know it was a sonnet? The beauty of Romeo and Juliet's encounter and a return to form\",\"authors\":\"Scott F. Crider\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/MORE.2019.0051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article examines the formal properties of Romeo and Juliet's encounter-sonnet, and suggests that Shakespeare included the sonnet for readers he hoped would be repeat play-goers. There are two parts of the case: 1) The first part takes up Romeo and Juliet's first encounter and examines it as a sonnet, orienting the analysis of its poetics through a historicized understanding of poetic form, book culture and theatrical performance; 2) the second asks how a member of Shakespeare's own play audience would have known that the sonnet is one, arguing that s/he might not have without having read the play beforehand. The relationship between quarto-reading and play-going perhaps encouraged audiences to see the play again after reading it. The article concludes by defending the return to form in Shakespeare Studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MOREANA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MOREANA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/MORE.2019.0051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MOREANA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/MORE.2019.0051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
How did they know it was a sonnet? The beauty of Romeo and Juliet's encounter and a return to form
The article examines the formal properties of Romeo and Juliet's encounter-sonnet, and suggests that Shakespeare included the sonnet for readers he hoped would be repeat play-goers. There are two parts of the case: 1) The first part takes up Romeo and Juliet's first encounter and examines it as a sonnet, orienting the analysis of its poetics through a historicized understanding of poetic form, book culture and theatrical performance; 2) the second asks how a member of Shakespeare's own play audience would have known that the sonnet is one, arguing that s/he might not have without having read the play beforehand. The relationship between quarto-reading and play-going perhaps encouraged audiences to see the play again after reading it. The article concludes by defending the return to form in Shakespeare Studies.