他们怎么知道这是一首十四行诗?罗密欧与茱丽叶的邂逅与回归之美

IF 0.1 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES MOREANA Pub Date : 2019-05-13 DOI:10.3366/MORE.2019.0051
Scott F. Crider
{"title":"他们怎么知道这是一首十四行诗?罗密欧与茱丽叶的邂逅与回归之美","authors":"Scott F. Crider","doi":"10.3366/MORE.2019.0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the formal properties of Romeo and Juliet's encounter-sonnet, and suggests that Shakespeare included the sonnet for readers he hoped would be repeat play-goers. There are two parts of the case: 1) The first part takes up Romeo and Juliet's first encounter and examines it as a sonnet, orienting the analysis of its poetics through a historicized understanding of poetic form, book culture and theatrical performance; 2) the second asks how a member of Shakespeare's own play audience would have known that the sonnet is one, arguing that s/he might not have without having read the play beforehand. The relationship between quarto-reading and play-going perhaps encouraged audiences to see the play again after reading it. The article concludes by defending the return to form in Shakespeare Studies.","PeriodicalId":41939,"journal":{"name":"MOREANA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How did they know it was a sonnet? The beauty of Romeo and Juliet's encounter and a return to form\",\"authors\":\"Scott F. Crider\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/MORE.2019.0051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article examines the formal properties of Romeo and Juliet's encounter-sonnet, and suggests that Shakespeare included the sonnet for readers he hoped would be repeat play-goers. There are two parts of the case: 1) The first part takes up Romeo and Juliet's first encounter and examines it as a sonnet, orienting the analysis of its poetics through a historicized understanding of poetic form, book culture and theatrical performance; 2) the second asks how a member of Shakespeare's own play audience would have known that the sonnet is one, arguing that s/he might not have without having read the play beforehand. The relationship between quarto-reading and play-going perhaps encouraged audiences to see the play again after reading it. The article concludes by defending the return to form in Shakespeare Studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MOREANA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MOREANA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/MORE.2019.0051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MOREANA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/MORE.2019.0051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇文章考察了《罗密欧与朱丽叶》相遇十四行诗的形式特征,并指出莎士比亚写这首十四行诗是为了让读者成为常去看戏的人。本文分为两部分:1)第一部分以《罗密欧与朱丽叶》的初次相遇为研究对象,将其作为一首十四行诗进行考察,通过对诗歌形式、书籍文化和戏剧表演的历史化理解来定位其诗学分析;2)第二个问题是莎士比亚自己的戏剧观众如何知道十四行诗是一首十四行诗,认为如果没有事先阅读剧本,他/她可能不会知道。四开本阅读和看戏之间的关系也许鼓励了观众在看完剧本后再看一遍。文章最后为莎士比亚研究中的回归形式进行了辩护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How did they know it was a sonnet? The beauty of Romeo and Juliet's encounter and a return to form
The article examines the formal properties of Romeo and Juliet's encounter-sonnet, and suggests that Shakespeare included the sonnet for readers he hoped would be repeat play-goers. There are two parts of the case: 1) The first part takes up Romeo and Juliet's first encounter and examines it as a sonnet, orienting the analysis of its poetics through a historicized understanding of poetic form, book culture and theatrical performance; 2) the second asks how a member of Shakespeare's own play audience would have known that the sonnet is one, arguing that s/he might not have without having read the play beforehand. The relationship between quarto-reading and play-going perhaps encouraged audiences to see the play again after reading it. The article concludes by defending the return to form in Shakespeare Studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MOREANA
MOREANA MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
A brief discussion of the differences in the four inscriptions of More’s Utopia G. W. Bernard, Who Ruled Tudor England: An Essay in the Paradoxes of PowerLucy Wooding, Tudor England: A History The Milk Street mystery: Thomas More’s birthplace Lyric, lovers, and limitlessness: Shakespeare’s quarrel with time in Sonnet 55 The politics of Thomas More's A Dialogue of Comfort against Tribulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1