通过可调节的社会自主性进行人机交互

IF 1.9 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Intelligenza Artificiale Pub Date : 2022-07-08 DOI:10.3233/ia-210124
Filippo Cantucci, R. Falcone, C. Castelfranchi
{"title":"通过可调节的社会自主性进行人机交互","authors":"Filippo Cantucci, R. Falcone, C. Castelfranchi","doi":"10.3233/ia-210124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Autonomy is crucial in cooperation. The complexity of HRI scenarios requires autonomous robots able to exploit their superhuman computations (based on DNN, Machine Learning techniques and Big Data) in a trustworthy way. Trustworthiness is not only a matter of accuracy, privacy or security, but it is becoming more and more a matter of adaptation to humans agency. As claimed by Falcone and Castelfranchi, autonomy means the possibility of dislaying or providing an unexpected behavior (including refusal) that departs from a requested (agreed upon or not) behavior. In this sense, the autonomy to decide how to adopt a task delegated by the user, with respect to her/his own real needs and goals, distinguishes intelligent and trustworthy robots from highly performing robots. This kind of smart help can be provided only by cognitive robots able to represent and ascribe mental states (beliefs, goals, intentions, desires etc.) to their interlocutors. The mental states attribution can be the result of complex reasoning mechanisms or can be fast and automatic, based on scripts, roles, categories or stereotypes typically exploited by humans every time they interact in everyday life. In all these cases, robots that build and use cognitive models of humans (that have a Theory of Mind of their interlocutors), have to operate also a meta-evaluation of their own predictive skills to build those models. Robots have to be endowed with the capability to self-trust their skills to interpret the interlocutors and the context, for producing smart and effective decisions towards humans. After exploring the main concepts that make collaboration between humans and robots trustworthy and effective, we present the first of a series of experiments draw for testing different aspects of a designed cognitive architecture for trustworthy HRI. This architecture, based on consolidated theoretical principles (theory of social adjustable autonomy, theory of mind, theory of trust) has the main goal to build cognitive robots that provide smart, trustworthy collaboration, every time a human requires their help. In particular, the experiment has been designed in order to demonstrate how the robot’s capability to learn its own level of self-trust on its predictive abilities in perceiving the user and building a model of her/him, allows it to establish a trustworthy collaboration and to maintain a high level of user’s satisfaction, with respect to the robot’s performance, also when these abilities progressively degrade.","PeriodicalId":42055,"journal":{"name":"Intelligenza Artificiale","volume":"16 1","pages":"69-79"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human-robot interaction through adjustable social autonomy\",\"authors\":\"Filippo Cantucci, R. Falcone, C. Castelfranchi\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/ia-210124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Autonomy is crucial in cooperation. The complexity of HRI scenarios requires autonomous robots able to exploit their superhuman computations (based on DNN, Machine Learning techniques and Big Data) in a trustworthy way. Trustworthiness is not only a matter of accuracy, privacy or security, but it is becoming more and more a matter of adaptation to humans agency. As claimed by Falcone and Castelfranchi, autonomy means the possibility of dislaying or providing an unexpected behavior (including refusal) that departs from a requested (agreed upon or not) behavior. In this sense, the autonomy to decide how to adopt a task delegated by the user, with respect to her/his own real needs and goals, distinguishes intelligent and trustworthy robots from highly performing robots. This kind of smart help can be provided only by cognitive robots able to represent and ascribe mental states (beliefs, goals, intentions, desires etc.) to their interlocutors. The mental states attribution can be the result of complex reasoning mechanisms or can be fast and automatic, based on scripts, roles, categories or stereotypes typically exploited by humans every time they interact in everyday life. In all these cases, robots that build and use cognitive models of humans (that have a Theory of Mind of their interlocutors), have to operate also a meta-evaluation of their own predictive skills to build those models. Robots have to be endowed with the capability to self-trust their skills to interpret the interlocutors and the context, for producing smart and effective decisions towards humans. After exploring the main concepts that make collaboration between humans and robots trustworthy and effective, we present the first of a series of experiments draw for testing different aspects of a designed cognitive architecture for trustworthy HRI. This architecture, based on consolidated theoretical principles (theory of social adjustable autonomy, theory of mind, theory of trust) has the main goal to build cognitive robots that provide smart, trustworthy collaboration, every time a human requires their help. In particular, the experiment has been designed in order to demonstrate how the robot’s capability to learn its own level of self-trust on its predictive abilities in perceiving the user and building a model of her/him, allows it to establish a trustworthy collaboration and to maintain a high level of user’s satisfaction, with respect to the robot’s performance, also when these abilities progressively degrade.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intelligenza Artificiale\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"69-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intelligenza Artificiale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/ia-210124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligenza Artificiale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ia-210124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自主在合作中至关重要。HRI场景的复杂性要求自主机器人能够以可靠的方式利用其超人的计算能力(基于深度神经网络、机器学习技术和大数据)。可信度不仅是一个准确性、隐私性或安全性的问题,而且越来越成为一个适应人类代理的问题。正如Falcone和Castelfranchi所声称的,自主性是指表现或提供一种与请求(同意或不同意)行为不同的意外行为(包括拒绝)的可能性。从这个意义上说,自主决定如何接受用户委托的任务,相对于她/他自己的真实需求和目标,区分智能和值得信赖的机器人与高性能机器人。这种智能的帮助只能由具有认知能力的机器人来提供,这些机器人能够将精神状态(信念、目标、意图、欲望等)表示并赋予对话者。心理状态归因可以是复杂推理机制的结果,也可以是快速和自动的,基于剧本、角色、类别或刻板印象,通常是人类在日常生活中互动时利用的。在所有这些情况下,建立和使用人类认知模型的机器人(拥有对话者的心智理论),也必须对自己的预测技能进行元评估,以建立这些模型。机器人必须具有自我信任的能力,能够理解对话者和上下文,从而对人类做出明智而有效的决定。在探索了使人类和机器人之间的协作可信和有效的主要概念之后,我们提出了一系列实验图中的第一个,用于测试可信赖HRI设计的认知架构的不同方面。这种架构基于统一的理论原则(社会可调节自主性理论、心智理论、信任理论),其主要目标是构建认知机器人,每当人类需要它们的帮助时,它们都能提供智能、值得信赖的协作。特别是,该实验的设计是为了展示机器人在感知用户和建立她/他的模型的预测能力上如何学习自己的自我信任水平,使其能够建立值得信赖的协作并保持高水平的用户满意度,相对于机器人的性能,也当这些能力逐渐退化时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Human-robot interaction through adjustable social autonomy
Autonomy is crucial in cooperation. The complexity of HRI scenarios requires autonomous robots able to exploit their superhuman computations (based on DNN, Machine Learning techniques and Big Data) in a trustworthy way. Trustworthiness is not only a matter of accuracy, privacy or security, but it is becoming more and more a matter of adaptation to humans agency. As claimed by Falcone and Castelfranchi, autonomy means the possibility of dislaying or providing an unexpected behavior (including refusal) that departs from a requested (agreed upon or not) behavior. In this sense, the autonomy to decide how to adopt a task delegated by the user, with respect to her/his own real needs and goals, distinguishes intelligent and trustworthy robots from highly performing robots. This kind of smart help can be provided only by cognitive robots able to represent and ascribe mental states (beliefs, goals, intentions, desires etc.) to their interlocutors. The mental states attribution can be the result of complex reasoning mechanisms or can be fast and automatic, based on scripts, roles, categories or stereotypes typically exploited by humans every time they interact in everyday life. In all these cases, robots that build and use cognitive models of humans (that have a Theory of Mind of their interlocutors), have to operate also a meta-evaluation of their own predictive skills to build those models. Robots have to be endowed with the capability to self-trust their skills to interpret the interlocutors and the context, for producing smart and effective decisions towards humans. After exploring the main concepts that make collaboration between humans and robots trustworthy and effective, we present the first of a series of experiments draw for testing different aspects of a designed cognitive architecture for trustworthy HRI. This architecture, based on consolidated theoretical principles (theory of social adjustable autonomy, theory of mind, theory of trust) has the main goal to build cognitive robots that provide smart, trustworthy collaboration, every time a human requires their help. In particular, the experiment has been designed in order to demonstrate how the robot’s capability to learn its own level of self-trust on its predictive abilities in perceiving the user and building a model of her/him, allows it to establish a trustworthy collaboration and to maintain a high level of user’s satisfaction, with respect to the robot’s performance, also when these abilities progressively degrade.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intelligenza Artificiale
Intelligenza Artificiale COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Special Issue NL4AI 2022: Workshop on natural language for artificial intelligence User-centric item characteristics for personalized multimedia systems: A systematic review Combining human intelligence and machine learning for fact-checking: Towards a hybrid human-in-the-loop framework A framework for safe decision making: A convex duality approach Grounding End-to-End Pre-trained architectures for Semantic Role Labeling in multiple languages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1