评价新生儿成果国际网络:产出和未来方向

P. Shah, T. Isayama, Kjell Helenius, L. San Feliciano, M. Beltempo, D. Bassler, S. Håkansson, F. Rusconi, N. Modi, M. Battin, M. Vento, M. Adams, L. Lehtonen, M. Norman, S. Kusuda, B. Reichman, K. Lui, Shoo K. Lee
{"title":"评价新生儿成果国际网络:产出和未来方向","authors":"P. Shah, T. Isayama, Kjell Helenius, L. San Feliciano, M. Beltempo, D. Bassler, S. Håkansson, F. Rusconi, N. Modi, M. Battin, M. Vento, M. Adams, L. Lehtonen, M. Norman, S. Kusuda, B. Reichman, K. Lui, Shoo K. Lee","doi":"10.21037/pm-21-73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ten neonatal networks from 11 countries—Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Finland, Israel, Japan, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the Tuscany region of Italy, and the UK—came together in 2012 to form the International Network for Evaluating Outcomes of Neonates (iNeo): an international collaboration of population-representative, national neonatal datasets. The result has been a powerful platform for epidemiological, outcomes-based, and applied health services and policy research. The network has successfully collaborated to evaluate variations in health service organization, practices, and outcomes, with an aim to harmonize processes and identify areas for quality improvement in the various countries. We have identified marked variations in outcomes such as mortality, severe neurological injury, and treated retinopathy of prematurity; and highlighted the important need for the neonatal community to harmonize criteria for diagnosing bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Despite marked changes in the respiratory management of extremely preterm neonates with the aim to avoid mechanical ventilation, judicious use of oxygen, and less invasive administration of surfactant, rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia have continued to rise in most countries. This may be due to marked discrepancies in the diagnostic criteria for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely preterm neonates. We were able to conduct a detailed survey of more than 300 neonatal units worldwide and link the responses with actual patient data to generate hypotheses to evaluate 23 † Names and affiliations of the iNeo investigators are provided in the Acknowledgments. Pediatric Medicine, 2021 Page 2 of 23 © Pediatric Medicine. All rights reserved. Pediatr Med 2021 | https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/pm-21-73 Background information Ten neonatal networks from 11 countries—Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Finland, Israel, Japan, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the Tuscany region of Italy, and the UK—came together in 2012 to form the International Network for Evaluating Outcomes of Neonates (iNeo): an international collaboration of population-representative, national neonatal datasets. The result is a powerful platform for epidemiological, outcomes-based, and applied health services and policy research. Our underlying goal in building this collaboration was to improve patient-oriented outcomes for neonates born very preterm (VPT, born before 32 weeks’ gestational age) and extremely preterm (EPT, born before 28 weeks’ gestation) around the world. As outlined by others in this article series, most of the networks involved in iNeo have well-established platforms for their own internal evaluation, benchmarking, and quality improvement activities. They also participate in many benchmarking activities both nationally and internationally. Since inception, iNeo has produced several high-quality outputs in the domains of outcomes evaluation, evaluation of care and practice similarities and differences between the networks, epidemiological studies, and health services evaluation. In this article we will review the salient features of these outputs and identify opportunities for the next phase in this influential international collaboration. Overarching network aims As detailed in the following sections, the iNeo collaboration has made steady progress towards achieving many of its initial aims (1): These aims were to compare neonatal outcomes and health service organization for VPT neonates at the national level; to identify differences in site-level physical, human, and environmental characteristics, as well as care practices, that underlie the outcome variations; to identify clinical and organizational practice improvements relevant to each network; to implement and continually evaluate the impact of data-informed and evidence-linked clinical and organizational practice changes in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) within participating networks; and to train and mentor junior researchers in the conduct of neonatal-perinatal health services research. Network structure and organization The iNeo collaboration was established in 2013 with funds from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research’s Institute of Human Development, Child and Youth Health (2). Its purpose is to collect phenotypic information on newborns admitted to neonatal units in the participating countries, along with some maternal details, at the time of birth. As this information is already collected in local datasets, the purpose of iNeo is to first harmonize and then collectively assemble a larger pool of individual patient data from the original, population-based networks or datasets. Harmonization efforts like these have even stimulated interest and opportunities in country like China, which recently reported their first cohort data from 68 neonatal units (3-5). The underlying principles of the iNeo collaboration were to study variations in the outcomes, characteristics, practices, and cultures of the member sites; evaluate the impact of such variations on neonatal outcomes; and identify and learn from different models of health service delivery (incorporating medical and nonmedical variations). The results have been published and advertised by respective network to their constituents to in future studies. Specific areas of investigation have included preventing necrotizing enterocolitis, managing patent ductus arteriosus, and managing neonates with critical events such as severe intraventricular hemorrhage. In addition, we studied the physical design of neonatal units from family-centered care delivery point of view and multidisciplinary team inclusion in care of neonates. In this review, we summarize our opportunities for improvement and future plans for the collaboration. We also highlight the challenges we face as an international collaboration, such as sustainability and funding.","PeriodicalId":74411,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric medicine (Hong Kong, China)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International network for evaluating outcomes of neonates: outputs and future directions\",\"authors\":\"P. Shah, T. Isayama, Kjell Helenius, L. San Feliciano, M. Beltempo, D. Bassler, S. Håkansson, F. Rusconi, N. Modi, M. Battin, M. Vento, M. Adams, L. Lehtonen, M. Norman, S. Kusuda, B. Reichman, K. Lui, Shoo K. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/pm-21-73\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ten neonatal networks from 11 countries—Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Finland, Israel, Japan, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the Tuscany region of Italy, and the UK—came together in 2012 to form the International Network for Evaluating Outcomes of Neonates (iNeo): an international collaboration of population-representative, national neonatal datasets. The result has been a powerful platform for epidemiological, outcomes-based, and applied health services and policy research. The network has successfully collaborated to evaluate variations in health service organization, practices, and outcomes, with an aim to harmonize processes and identify areas for quality improvement in the various countries. We have identified marked variations in outcomes such as mortality, severe neurological injury, and treated retinopathy of prematurity; and highlighted the important need for the neonatal community to harmonize criteria for diagnosing bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Despite marked changes in the respiratory management of extremely preterm neonates with the aim to avoid mechanical ventilation, judicious use of oxygen, and less invasive administration of surfactant, rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia have continued to rise in most countries. This may be due to marked discrepancies in the diagnostic criteria for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely preterm neonates. We were able to conduct a detailed survey of more than 300 neonatal units worldwide and link the responses with actual patient data to generate hypotheses to evaluate 23 † Names and affiliations of the iNeo investigators are provided in the Acknowledgments. Pediatric Medicine, 2021 Page 2 of 23 © Pediatric Medicine. All rights reserved. Pediatr Med 2021 | https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/pm-21-73 Background information Ten neonatal networks from 11 countries—Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Finland, Israel, Japan, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the Tuscany region of Italy, and the UK—came together in 2012 to form the International Network for Evaluating Outcomes of Neonates (iNeo): an international collaboration of population-representative, national neonatal datasets. The result is a powerful platform for epidemiological, outcomes-based, and applied health services and policy research. Our underlying goal in building this collaboration was to improve patient-oriented outcomes for neonates born very preterm (VPT, born before 32 weeks’ gestational age) and extremely preterm (EPT, born before 28 weeks’ gestation) around the world. As outlined by others in this article series, most of the networks involved in iNeo have well-established platforms for their own internal evaluation, benchmarking, and quality improvement activities. They also participate in many benchmarking activities both nationally and internationally. Since inception, iNeo has produced several high-quality outputs in the domains of outcomes evaluation, evaluation of care and practice similarities and differences between the networks, epidemiological studies, and health services evaluation. In this article we will review the salient features of these outputs and identify opportunities for the next phase in this influential international collaboration. Overarching network aims As detailed in the following sections, the iNeo collaboration has made steady progress towards achieving many of its initial aims (1): These aims were to compare neonatal outcomes and health service organization for VPT neonates at the national level; to identify differences in site-level physical, human, and environmental characteristics, as well as care practices, that underlie the outcome variations; to identify clinical and organizational practice improvements relevant to each network; to implement and continually evaluate the impact of data-informed and evidence-linked clinical and organizational practice changes in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) within participating networks; and to train and mentor junior researchers in the conduct of neonatal-perinatal health services research. Network structure and organization The iNeo collaboration was established in 2013 with funds from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research’s Institute of Human Development, Child and Youth Health (2). Its purpose is to collect phenotypic information on newborns admitted to neonatal units in the participating countries, along with some maternal details, at the time of birth. As this information is already collected in local datasets, the purpose of iNeo is to first harmonize and then collectively assemble a larger pool of individual patient data from the original, population-based networks or datasets. Harmonization efforts like these have even stimulated interest and opportunities in country like China, which recently reported their first cohort data from 68 neonatal units (3-5). The underlying principles of the iNeo collaboration were to study variations in the outcomes, characteristics, practices, and cultures of the member sites; evaluate the impact of such variations on neonatal outcomes; and identify and learn from different models of health service delivery (incorporating medical and nonmedical variations). The results have been published and advertised by respective network to their constituents to in future studies. Specific areas of investigation have included preventing necrotizing enterocolitis, managing patent ductus arteriosus, and managing neonates with critical events such as severe intraventricular hemorrhage. In addition, we studied the physical design of neonatal units from family-centered care delivery point of view and multidisciplinary team inclusion in care of neonates. In this review, we summarize our opportunities for improvement and future plans for the collaboration. We also highlight the challenges we face as an international collaboration, such as sustainability and funding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric medicine (Hong Kong, China)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric medicine (Hong Kong, China)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/pm-21-73\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric medicine (Hong Kong, China)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/pm-21-73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2012年,来自澳大利亚、新西兰、加拿大、芬兰、以色列、日本、西班牙、瑞典、瑞士、意大利托斯卡纳地区和英国等11个国家的10个新生儿网络联合成立了国际新生儿结果评估网络(iNeo):这是一个人口代表性的国家新生儿数据集的国际合作。其结果为流行病学、基于结果的应用卫生服务和政策研究提供了一个强大的平台。该网络成功地合作评估了卫生服务组织、做法和结果的差异,目的是协调各个国家的流程并确定质量改进领域。我们已经确定了死亡率、严重神经损伤和早产儿视网膜病变治疗等结果的显著差异;并强调了新生儿社区协调诊断支气管肺发育不良标准的重要必要性。尽管极早产儿的呼吸管理发生了显著变化,目的是避免机械通气、明智地使用氧气和低侵入性使用表面活性物质,但在大多数国家,支气管肺发育不良的发生率仍在持续上升。这可能是由于极早产儿支气管肺发育不良的诊断标准存在显著差异。我们能够对全球300多个新生儿单位进行详细调查,并将反应与实际患者数据联系起来,以产生假设来评估23†iNeo研究人员的姓名和隶属关系。儿科医学,2021第2页,共23页©儿科医学。保留所有权利。儿科医学2021 |https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/pm-21-73背景信息来自澳大利亚、新西兰、加拿大、芬兰、以色列、日本、西班牙、瑞典、瑞士、意大利托斯卡纳地区和英国等11个国家的10个新生儿网络于2012年联合成立了国际新生儿结果评估网络(iNeo):这是一个人口代表性的国家新生儿数据集的国际合作。其结果是为流行病学、基于结果的应用卫生服务和政策研究提供了一个强大的平台。我们建立这一合作的根本目标是改善世界各地极早产(VPT,胎龄32周前出生)和极早产(EPT,孕28周前出生的)新生儿以患者为导向的结果。正如本系列文章中其他人所概述的,iNeo中涉及的大多数网络都有完善的平台,用于自己的内部评估、基准测试和质量改进活动。他们还参加了许多国家和国际基准活动。自成立以来,iNeo在结果评估、护理和实践网络之间的异同评估、流行病学研究和卫生服务评估等领域产生了几项高质量的产出。在这篇文章中,我们将回顾这些产出的显著特征,并为这一有影响力的国际合作的下一阶段确定机会。总体网络目标如以下各节所述,iNeo合作在实现其许多初步目标方面取得了稳步进展(1):这些目标是在国家层面比较新生儿结局和VPT新生儿的卫生服务组织;确定导致结果变化的现场物理、人类和环境特征以及护理实践的差异;确定与每个网络相关的临床和组织实践改进;在参与网络内实施并持续评估新生儿重症监护室(NICU)中基于数据和证据的临床和组织实践变化的影响;培训和指导初级研究人员开展新生儿围产期保健服务研究。网络结构和组织iNeo合作成立于2013年,资金来自加拿大卫生研究院人类发展、儿童和青年健康研究所(2)。其目的是收集参与国新生儿病房收治新生儿的表型信息,以及出生时的一些产妇详细信息。由于这些信息已经在本地数据集中收集,iNeo的目的是首先协调,然后从原始的基于人群的网络或数据集中收集更大的个体患者数据池。像这样的协调工作甚至激发了中国这样的国家的兴趣和机会,中国最近报告了68个新生儿病房(3-5个)的第一批队列数据。 iNeo合作的基本原则是研究成员网站的结果、特征、实践和文化的变化;评估这些变化对新生儿结局的影响;识别并学习不同的医疗服务提供模式(包括医疗和非医疗变化)。研究结果已由各自的网络发布,并在未来的研究中向其组成部分发布广告。具体的研究领域包括预防坏死性小肠结肠炎、治疗动脉导管未闭和治疗新生儿严重脑室内出血等危重事件。此外,我们从以家庭为中心的护理提供角度和多学科团队参与新生儿护理的角度研究了新生儿病房的物理设计。在这篇综述中,我们总结了我们的改进机会和未来的合作计划。我们还强调了我们作为国际合作所面临的挑战,如可持续性和资金筹措。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
International network for evaluating outcomes of neonates: outputs and future directions
Ten neonatal networks from 11 countries—Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Finland, Israel, Japan, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the Tuscany region of Italy, and the UK—came together in 2012 to form the International Network for Evaluating Outcomes of Neonates (iNeo): an international collaboration of population-representative, national neonatal datasets. The result has been a powerful platform for epidemiological, outcomes-based, and applied health services and policy research. The network has successfully collaborated to evaluate variations in health service organization, practices, and outcomes, with an aim to harmonize processes and identify areas for quality improvement in the various countries. We have identified marked variations in outcomes such as mortality, severe neurological injury, and treated retinopathy of prematurity; and highlighted the important need for the neonatal community to harmonize criteria for diagnosing bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Despite marked changes in the respiratory management of extremely preterm neonates with the aim to avoid mechanical ventilation, judicious use of oxygen, and less invasive administration of surfactant, rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia have continued to rise in most countries. This may be due to marked discrepancies in the diagnostic criteria for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely preterm neonates. We were able to conduct a detailed survey of more than 300 neonatal units worldwide and link the responses with actual patient data to generate hypotheses to evaluate 23 † Names and affiliations of the iNeo investigators are provided in the Acknowledgments. Pediatric Medicine, 2021 Page 2 of 23 © Pediatric Medicine. All rights reserved. Pediatr Med 2021 | https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/pm-21-73 Background information Ten neonatal networks from 11 countries—Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Finland, Israel, Japan, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the Tuscany region of Italy, and the UK—came together in 2012 to form the International Network for Evaluating Outcomes of Neonates (iNeo): an international collaboration of population-representative, national neonatal datasets. The result is a powerful platform for epidemiological, outcomes-based, and applied health services and policy research. Our underlying goal in building this collaboration was to improve patient-oriented outcomes for neonates born very preterm (VPT, born before 32 weeks’ gestational age) and extremely preterm (EPT, born before 28 weeks’ gestation) around the world. As outlined by others in this article series, most of the networks involved in iNeo have well-established platforms for their own internal evaluation, benchmarking, and quality improvement activities. They also participate in many benchmarking activities both nationally and internationally. Since inception, iNeo has produced several high-quality outputs in the domains of outcomes evaluation, evaluation of care and practice similarities and differences between the networks, epidemiological studies, and health services evaluation. In this article we will review the salient features of these outputs and identify opportunities for the next phase in this influential international collaboration. Overarching network aims As detailed in the following sections, the iNeo collaboration has made steady progress towards achieving many of its initial aims (1): These aims were to compare neonatal outcomes and health service organization for VPT neonates at the national level; to identify differences in site-level physical, human, and environmental characteristics, as well as care practices, that underlie the outcome variations; to identify clinical and organizational practice improvements relevant to each network; to implement and continually evaluate the impact of data-informed and evidence-linked clinical and organizational practice changes in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) within participating networks; and to train and mentor junior researchers in the conduct of neonatal-perinatal health services research. Network structure and organization The iNeo collaboration was established in 2013 with funds from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research’s Institute of Human Development, Child and Youth Health (2). Its purpose is to collect phenotypic information on newborns admitted to neonatal units in the participating countries, along with some maternal details, at the time of birth. As this information is already collected in local datasets, the purpose of iNeo is to first harmonize and then collectively assemble a larger pool of individual patient data from the original, population-based networks or datasets. Harmonization efforts like these have even stimulated interest and opportunities in country like China, which recently reported their first cohort data from 68 neonatal units (3-5). The underlying principles of the iNeo collaboration were to study variations in the outcomes, characteristics, practices, and cultures of the member sites; evaluate the impact of such variations on neonatal outcomes; and identify and learn from different models of health service delivery (incorporating medical and nonmedical variations). The results have been published and advertised by respective network to their constituents to in future studies. Specific areas of investigation have included preventing necrotizing enterocolitis, managing patent ductus arteriosus, and managing neonates with critical events such as severe intraventricular hemorrhage. In addition, we studied the physical design of neonatal units from family-centered care delivery point of view and multidisciplinary team inclusion in care of neonates. In this review, we summarize our opportunities for improvement and future plans for the collaboration. We also highlight the challenges we face as an international collaboration, such as sustainability and funding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spectral features of non-nutritive suck dynamics in extremely preterm infants. Influence of orthokeratology lens treatment zone decentration on myopia progression: a systematic review with meta-analysis Primary cilia in the development of the cerebral cortex: a literature review Optimal oxygen use in neonatal advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation-a literature review. Effects of maternal folic acid supplementation on renal urinary system development in human offspring—a meta-analysis and systemic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1