青少年精神病评估中的良心相关性和敏感性

IF 0.4 Q4 PEDIATRICS Adolescent Psychiatry Pub Date : 2020-01-10 DOI:10.2174/2210676609666190415142734
M. Galvin, L. Hulvershorn, Margaret M. Gaffney
{"title":"青少年精神病评估中的良心相关性和敏感性","authors":"M. Galvin, L. Hulvershorn, Margaret M. Gaffney","doi":"10.2174/2210676609666190415142734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nWhile practice parameters recommend assessment of conscience\nand values, few resources are available to guide clinicians.\n\n\n\nTo improve making moral inquiry in youth aged 15 to 24.\n\n\n\nAfter documenting available resources for behavioral health clinicians who are inquiring\nabout their patient’s moral life, we consider our studies of conscience development\nand functioning in youth. We align descriptions of domains of conscience with neurobiology.\nWe compare youth reared in relative advantage, who have fairly smooth functional progressions\nacross domains, with youth reared in adverse circumstances. We offer the heuristic\nconscience developmental quotient to help mind the gap between conscience in adversity and\nconscience in advantage. Next, we consider severity of psychopathological interference as\ndistinct from delay. A case illustration is provided to support the distinction be\n\n\n\nOur findings support the hypotheses that youth who experience adverse childhood\nexperiences show evidence of fragmentation, unevenness and delay in their conscience\nstage-attainment. We demonstrate proof of concept for conscience sensitive psychiatric assessment\nin the youth-span. Conscience sensitive inquiries improve upon merely conscience\nrelevant interpretations by affording better appreciation of moral wounding, in turn setting\nthe stage for moral-imaginative efforts that elicit and make the latent values of the youth\nmore explicit.\n\n\n\nA conscience sensitive approach should be part of both psychiatric and general\nmedical education, supported explicitly by clinical guidelines recommending conscience\nsensitive interview techniques that aim to acquire information aligned with current neurobiological\nterminology.\n","PeriodicalId":43326,"journal":{"name":"Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":"9 1","pages":"167-184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/2210676609666190415142734","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conscience Relevance and Sensitivity in Psychiatric Evaluations in the Youth-span\",\"authors\":\"M. Galvin, L. Hulvershorn, Margaret M. Gaffney\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/2210676609666190415142734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nWhile practice parameters recommend assessment of conscience\\nand values, few resources are available to guide clinicians.\\n\\n\\n\\nTo improve making moral inquiry in youth aged 15 to 24.\\n\\n\\n\\nAfter documenting available resources for behavioral health clinicians who are inquiring\\nabout their patient’s moral life, we consider our studies of conscience development\\nand functioning in youth. We align descriptions of domains of conscience with neurobiology.\\nWe compare youth reared in relative advantage, who have fairly smooth functional progressions\\nacross domains, with youth reared in adverse circumstances. We offer the heuristic\\nconscience developmental quotient to help mind the gap between conscience in adversity and\\nconscience in advantage. Next, we consider severity of psychopathological interference as\\ndistinct from delay. A case illustration is provided to support the distinction be\\n\\n\\n\\nOur findings support the hypotheses that youth who experience adverse childhood\\nexperiences show evidence of fragmentation, unevenness and delay in their conscience\\nstage-attainment. We demonstrate proof of concept for conscience sensitive psychiatric assessment\\nin the youth-span. Conscience sensitive inquiries improve upon merely conscience\\nrelevant interpretations by affording better appreciation of moral wounding, in turn setting\\nthe stage for moral-imaginative efforts that elicit and make the latent values of the youth\\nmore explicit.\\n\\n\\n\\nA conscience sensitive approach should be part of both psychiatric and general\\nmedical education, supported explicitly by clinical guidelines recommending conscience\\nsensitive interview techniques that aim to acquire information aligned with current neurobiological\\nterminology.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"167-184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/2210676609666190415142734\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/2210676609666190415142734\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2210676609666190415142734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然实践参数建议良心和价值观的评估,很少有资源可用于指导临床医生。提高15至24岁青少年的道德探究能力。在记录了询问病人道德生活的行为健康临床医生的可用资源后,我们考虑了我们对青少年良心发展和功能的研究。我们将良心领域的描述与神经生物学结合起来。我们比较了在相对优势环境中长大的年轻人,他们在各个领域的功能进步相当顺利,而在不利环境中长大的年轻人。我们提供了启发式良心发展商,以帮助理清处于逆境的良心和处于优势的良心之间的差距。接下来,我们将精神病理干扰的严重程度与延迟区分开来。我们的研究结果支持这样的假设,即经历不良童年经历的青少年在他们的良心阶段成就方面表现出碎片化、不均匀和延迟的证据。我们证明了在青少年时期良心敏感精神病评估的概念证明。对良心敏感的调查通过提供对道德伤害的更好理解,改进了仅仅与良心相关的解释,反过来为道德想象的努力奠定了基础,这些努力引出并使年轻人的潜在价值更加明确。良心敏感的方法应该成为精神病学和普通医学教育的一部分,并得到临床指导方针的明确支持,这些指导方针建议采用良心敏感的访谈技术,目的是获取与当前神经生物学术语一致的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conscience Relevance and Sensitivity in Psychiatric Evaluations in the Youth-span
While practice parameters recommend assessment of conscience and values, few resources are available to guide clinicians. To improve making moral inquiry in youth aged 15 to 24. After documenting available resources for behavioral health clinicians who are inquiring about their patient’s moral life, we consider our studies of conscience development and functioning in youth. We align descriptions of domains of conscience with neurobiology. We compare youth reared in relative advantage, who have fairly smooth functional progressions across domains, with youth reared in adverse circumstances. We offer the heuristic conscience developmental quotient to help mind the gap between conscience in adversity and conscience in advantage. Next, we consider severity of psychopathological interference as distinct from delay. A case illustration is provided to support the distinction be Our findings support the hypotheses that youth who experience adverse childhood experiences show evidence of fragmentation, unevenness and delay in their conscience stage-attainment. We demonstrate proof of concept for conscience sensitive psychiatric assessment in the youth-span. Conscience sensitive inquiries improve upon merely conscience relevant interpretations by affording better appreciation of moral wounding, in turn setting the stage for moral-imaginative efforts that elicit and make the latent values of the youth more explicit. A conscience sensitive approach should be part of both psychiatric and general medical education, supported explicitly by clinical guidelines recommending conscience sensitive interview techniques that aim to acquire information aligned with current neurobiological terminology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Adolescent Psychiatry
Adolescent Psychiatry PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Adolescent Psychiatry a peer-reviewed journal, aims to provide mental health professionals who work with adolescents with current information relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric disorders in adolescents. Adolescent Psychiatry reports of original research, critical reviews of topics relevant to practitioners, clinical observations with analysis and discussion, analysis of philosophical, ethical or social aspects of the fields of psychiatry and mental health, case reports with discussions, letters, and position papers. Topics include adolescent development and developmental psychopathology, psychotherapy and other psychosocial treatment approaches, psychopharmacology, and service settings and programs. The primary focus of the work should be on adolescents, transition-aged youth, The primary focus of the work should be on adolescents, transition-aged youth, or emerging adults, that is, persons 12-24 years of age . Articles on families of adolescents, or adults who have been followed since adolescence will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
ADHD Symptoms Among Adolescents: Factor Structure Based on Mother and Adolescent Self-Ratings Social Media and Fear of Missing Out: An Exploration of the Role of Mindfulness, Cognitive Biases and Need to Belong in Chinese College Students A Brief Review of Flourishing Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Mood and Anxiety Disorders Impact of Changing Cannabis Laws on Cannabis Use Disorders, Serious Mental Illness, and Mortality Outcomes in US Youth: A Narrative Review Effects of Cannabidiol in Adolescent and Young Adult Depressive and Anxiety Disorders: A Systematic Review of Clinical and Preclinical Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1