Oda Wischmeyer,《爱如阿加佩:早期基督教概念与现代话语》(Waco,TX:贝勒大学出版社,2021),第xvi+317页$69.99

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-04-20 DOI:10.1017/S0036930622000461
Susan E. Hylen
{"title":"Oda Wischmeyer,《爱如阿加佩:早期基督教概念与现代话语》(Waco,TX:贝勒大学出版社,2021),第xvi+317页$69.99","authors":"Susan E. Hylen","doi":"10.1017/S0036930622000461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"indeed have much to say to these issues, but they are, at best, unevenly developed in relationship to the Swiss theologian’s own thought. Nevertheless, Hauerwas helpfully pushes back against the view that Barth’s critique of the liberal tradition, including liberal theology, meant that he was an anti-humanist. Barth wanted to promote a more radical humanism rooted in who God is in Jesus Christ, and thus who human beings are called to be, and Hauerwas certainly draws out aspects of this dimension of Barth’s thought. Even if this has become a well-worn counter-argument by those sympathetic to Barth, it is gratifying to see how one of the most influential and provocative theological voices of the last forty years is able to work in the spirit of a giant of twentieth-century Protestant thought, to not only illuminate that figure, but to offer an arguably more nuanced, christologically explicit account of Christian engagement with the world.","PeriodicalId":44026,"journal":{"name":"SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY","volume":"76 1","pages":"181 - 183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oda Wischmeyer, Love as Agape: The Early Christian Concept and Modern Discourse (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2021), pp. xvii + 317. $69.99\",\"authors\":\"Susan E. Hylen\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0036930622000461\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"indeed have much to say to these issues, but they are, at best, unevenly developed in relationship to the Swiss theologian’s own thought. Nevertheless, Hauerwas helpfully pushes back against the view that Barth’s critique of the liberal tradition, including liberal theology, meant that he was an anti-humanist. Barth wanted to promote a more radical humanism rooted in who God is in Jesus Christ, and thus who human beings are called to be, and Hauerwas certainly draws out aspects of this dimension of Barth’s thought. Even if this has become a well-worn counter-argument by those sympathetic to Barth, it is gratifying to see how one of the most influential and provocative theological voices of the last forty years is able to work in the spirit of a giant of twentieth-century Protestant thought, to not only illuminate that figure, but to offer an arguably more nuanced, christologically explicit account of Christian engagement with the world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"181 - 183\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0036930622000461\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0036930622000461","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对这些问题确实有很多话要说,但它们充其量只是与这位瑞士神学家自己的思想发展不平衡。尽管如此,豪尔瓦斯还是有力地反驳了这样一种观点,即巴特对自由主义传统的批判,包括自由主义神学,意味着他是一个反人道主义者。巴特想提倡一种更激进的人道主义,这种人道主义植根于上帝在耶稣基督里是谁,从而也植根于人类被称为谁,而豪尔瓦斯无疑从巴特思想的这个维度引出了一些方面。即使这已经成为那些同情巴特的人的一个老生常谈的反驳,但令人欣慰的是,过去四十年中最具影响力和挑衅性的神学声音之一能够以20世纪新教思想巨人的精神工作,不仅阐明了这个数字,而且提供了一个可以说更微妙的、,对基督徒与世界交往的基督教义的明确描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Oda Wischmeyer, Love as Agape: The Early Christian Concept and Modern Discourse (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2021), pp. xvii + 317. $69.99
indeed have much to say to these issues, but they are, at best, unevenly developed in relationship to the Swiss theologian’s own thought. Nevertheless, Hauerwas helpfully pushes back against the view that Barth’s critique of the liberal tradition, including liberal theology, meant that he was an anti-humanist. Barth wanted to promote a more radical humanism rooted in who God is in Jesus Christ, and thus who human beings are called to be, and Hauerwas certainly draws out aspects of this dimension of Barth’s thought. Even if this has become a well-worn counter-argument by those sympathetic to Barth, it is gratifying to see how one of the most influential and provocative theological voices of the last forty years is able to work in the spirit of a giant of twentieth-century Protestant thought, to not only illuminate that figure, but to offer an arguably more nuanced, christologically explicit account of Christian engagement with the world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
期刊最新文献
Eschatological naturalism and ecological responsibility: Troubling some assumptions Apocalyptic praxis in Evagrius of Pontus and Francis of Assisi Beyond text to God: Bonaventure's transformation of exegetical method from his Breviloquium to Itinerarium mentis in Deum (1257–1259) ‘The visible renewal of human life’: Barth's ethical assessment of the Reformed confessions The beauty of the body and the ascension: A reclamation and subversion of physical beauty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1