{"title":"男性不安全状态","authors":"K. Olmsted","doi":"10.1353/rah.2022.0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, Senator Joe McCarthy, and attorney Roy Cohn were among the most villainous figures in mid-century U.S. politics. In addition to intimidating dissenters and promoting traditional racial and gender hierarchies, the three men frequently smeared liberals and radicals as dangerous “sexual perverts.” Yet Christopher Elias argues that they were finally undermined by the same forces they helped unleash—“to varying degrees, each man was ultimately hoist with his own petard,” he says (p. 17). These men who devoted their careers to constructing what Elias calls “surveillance state masculinity” eventually had their own manhood called into question. Elias might not persuade the reader that these men suffered much for their ruthless queering of their opponents, but in the process of analyzing their performative masculinity, he reveals some fascinating connections between extremist anti-communism, changing norms in gender and sexuality, and the culture of gossip. Elias also shows how these three men constructed identities and invented techniques that still haunt U.S. politics today. Elias’s analysis of his main characters turns on the intersection of three historical developments: the expansion of the national surveillance state; the revolution in gender and sexual norms; and the emergence of a culture of gossip in American media, politics, and society. The first two themes—the roles that Hoover, McCarthy, and Cohn played in creating the surveillance state and their conscious construction of their own masculine identities—have received attention from scholars. Ellen Schrecker’s Many Are the Crimes (1998), Curt Gentry’s J. Edgar Hoover: The Man and the Secrets (1991), Athan Theoharis and John Stuart Cox’s The Boss (1988), Robert Griffith’s The Politics of Fear (1970), and David Oshinsky’s A Conspiracy So Immense (1983), among many other books, have described how Hoover and McCarthy gained and retained power by weaponizing American fears of communist infiltration. Claire Bond Potter’s War on Crime (1998) and Richard Gid Powers’s G-Men (1983) traced","PeriodicalId":43597,"journal":{"name":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","volume":"50 1","pages":"201 - 207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Masculine Insecurity State\",\"authors\":\"K. Olmsted\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/rah.2022.0022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, Senator Joe McCarthy, and attorney Roy Cohn were among the most villainous figures in mid-century U.S. politics. In addition to intimidating dissenters and promoting traditional racial and gender hierarchies, the three men frequently smeared liberals and radicals as dangerous “sexual perverts.” Yet Christopher Elias argues that they were finally undermined by the same forces they helped unleash—“to varying degrees, each man was ultimately hoist with his own petard,” he says (p. 17). These men who devoted their careers to constructing what Elias calls “surveillance state masculinity” eventually had their own manhood called into question. Elias might not persuade the reader that these men suffered much for their ruthless queering of their opponents, but in the process of analyzing their performative masculinity, he reveals some fascinating connections between extremist anti-communism, changing norms in gender and sexuality, and the culture of gossip. Elias also shows how these three men constructed identities and invented techniques that still haunt U.S. politics today. Elias’s analysis of his main characters turns on the intersection of three historical developments: the expansion of the national surveillance state; the revolution in gender and sexual norms; and the emergence of a culture of gossip in American media, politics, and society. The first two themes—the roles that Hoover, McCarthy, and Cohn played in creating the surveillance state and their conscious construction of their own masculine identities—have received attention from scholars. Ellen Schrecker’s Many Are the Crimes (1998), Curt Gentry’s J. Edgar Hoover: The Man and the Secrets (1991), Athan Theoharis and John Stuart Cox’s The Boss (1988), Robert Griffith’s The Politics of Fear (1970), and David Oshinsky’s A Conspiracy So Immense (1983), among many other books, have described how Hoover and McCarthy gained and retained power by weaponizing American fears of communist infiltration. Claire Bond Potter’s War on Crime (1998) and Richard Gid Powers’s G-Men (1983) traced\",\"PeriodicalId\":43597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"201 - 207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2022.0022\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2022.0022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
联邦调查局局长J·埃德加·胡佛、参议员乔·麦卡锡和律师罗伊·科恩是本世纪中叶美国政治中最邪恶的人物。除了恐吓持不同政见者和宣扬传统的种族和性别等级制度外,这三人还经常抹黑自由主义者和激进分子是危险的“性变态”。然而,克里斯托弗·埃利亚斯认为,他们最终被他们帮助释放的同一股力量所削弱——“在不同程度上,每个人最终都是被自己的手掌吊起来的,”他说(第17页)。这些人的职业生涯致力于构建埃利亚斯所说的“监控国家的男子气概”,最终他们自己的男子气概受到了质疑。埃利亚斯可能无法说服读者,这些人因为无情地折磨对手而遭受了太多痛苦,但在分析他们表演性的男子气概的过程中,他揭示了极端主义反共、不断变化的性别和性规范以及八卦文化之间的一些迷人联系。埃利亚斯还展示了这三个人是如何构建身份和发明技术的,这些技术至今仍困扰着美国政治。埃利亚斯对其主要人物的分析转向了三个历史发展的交叉点:国家监控国家的扩张;性别和性规范的革命;以及八卦文化在美国媒体、政治和社会中的出现。前两个主题——胡佛、麦卡锡和科恩在创造监视状态中所扮演的角色,以及他们对自己男性身份的自觉建构——受到了学者们的关注。Ellen Schrecker的《许多都是罪行》(1998)、Curt Gentry的J.Edgar Hoover的《人与秘密》(1991)、Athan Theoharis和John Stuart Cox的《老板》(1988)、Robert Griffith的《恐惧的政治》(1970)和David Oshinsky的《如此巨大的阴谋》(1983),描述了胡佛和麦卡锡如何通过将美国对共产主义渗透的恐惧武器化来获得和保留权力。克莱尔·邦德·波特的《打击犯罪的战争》(1998年)和理查德·吉德·鲍尔斯的《G-Men》(1983年)
FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, Senator Joe McCarthy, and attorney Roy Cohn were among the most villainous figures in mid-century U.S. politics. In addition to intimidating dissenters and promoting traditional racial and gender hierarchies, the three men frequently smeared liberals and radicals as dangerous “sexual perverts.” Yet Christopher Elias argues that they were finally undermined by the same forces they helped unleash—“to varying degrees, each man was ultimately hoist with his own petard,” he says (p. 17). These men who devoted their careers to constructing what Elias calls “surveillance state masculinity” eventually had their own manhood called into question. Elias might not persuade the reader that these men suffered much for their ruthless queering of their opponents, but in the process of analyzing their performative masculinity, he reveals some fascinating connections between extremist anti-communism, changing norms in gender and sexuality, and the culture of gossip. Elias also shows how these three men constructed identities and invented techniques that still haunt U.S. politics today. Elias’s analysis of his main characters turns on the intersection of three historical developments: the expansion of the national surveillance state; the revolution in gender and sexual norms; and the emergence of a culture of gossip in American media, politics, and society. The first two themes—the roles that Hoover, McCarthy, and Cohn played in creating the surveillance state and their conscious construction of their own masculine identities—have received attention from scholars. Ellen Schrecker’s Many Are the Crimes (1998), Curt Gentry’s J. Edgar Hoover: The Man and the Secrets (1991), Athan Theoharis and John Stuart Cox’s The Boss (1988), Robert Griffith’s The Politics of Fear (1970), and David Oshinsky’s A Conspiracy So Immense (1983), among many other books, have described how Hoover and McCarthy gained and retained power by weaponizing American fears of communist infiltration. Claire Bond Potter’s War on Crime (1998) and Richard Gid Powers’s G-Men (1983) traced
期刊介绍:
Reviews in American History provides an effective means for scholars and students of American history to stay up to date in their discipline. Each issue presents in-depth reviews of over thirty of the newest books in American history. Retrospective essays examining landmark works by major historians are also regularly featured. The journal covers all areas of American history including economics, military history, women in history, law, political history and philosophy, religion, social history, intellectual history, and cultural history. Readers can expect continued coverage of both traditional and new subjects of American history, always blending the recognition of recent developments with the ongoing importance of the core matter of the field.