论语篇语用学的l1 -习得

IF 0.6 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Functions of Language Pub Date : 2023-08-17 DOI:10.1075/fol.20025.sch
M. Schweinberger
{"title":"论语篇语用学的l1 -习得","authors":"M. Schweinberger","doi":"10.1075/fol.20025.sch","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study analyzes the L1-acquisition of discourse like and its pragmatic functions in American\n English based on the Home-School Study of Language and Literacy Development component of the Child\n Language Data Exchange System (CHILDES). The data show that discourse like is already present in the\n speech of 3- and 4-year-old children and that even very young children employ like to perform distinct pragmatic\n functions with specifying uses being dominant until age 8;5. The analysis also shows a notable increase in discourse\n like as children mature, mainly driven by an increase in attention-directing like, the\n dominant function of discourse like among children older than 8;5. Conditional inference trees show that the use\n of discourse like by children is affected by a child’s age, the situation type and the frequency of discourse\n like in caregivers’ input. Children younger than 7;10 use discourse like only rarely in\n formal contexts as well as in informal contexts if their caregivers do not use discourse like frequently.\n However, children use discourse like substantially more if they are older than 7;10 or, in informal contexts,\n when their caregivers use discourse like frequently. The changes in frequency and the functional shifts in the\n use of like around the ages of 7 to 9 is interpreted to show that peers become more important as linguistic role\n models when children enter school. The results thus substantiate research which suggests that the pragmatic and social meanings of\n discourse markers are learned alongside linguistic constraints rather than after the form has been acquired.","PeriodicalId":44232,"journal":{"name":"Functions of Language","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the L1-acquisition of the pragmatics of discourse like\",\"authors\":\"M. Schweinberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/fol.20025.sch\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study analyzes the L1-acquisition of discourse like and its pragmatic functions in American\\n English based on the Home-School Study of Language and Literacy Development component of the Child\\n Language Data Exchange System (CHILDES). The data show that discourse like is already present in the\\n speech of 3- and 4-year-old children and that even very young children employ like to perform distinct pragmatic\\n functions with specifying uses being dominant until age 8;5. The analysis also shows a notable increase in discourse\\n like as children mature, mainly driven by an increase in attention-directing like, the\\n dominant function of discourse like among children older than 8;5. Conditional inference trees show that the use\\n of discourse like by children is affected by a child’s age, the situation type and the frequency of discourse\\n like in caregivers’ input. Children younger than 7;10 use discourse like only rarely in\\n formal contexts as well as in informal contexts if their caregivers do not use discourse like frequently.\\n However, children use discourse like substantially more if they are older than 7;10 or, in informal contexts,\\n when their caregivers use discourse like frequently. The changes in frequency and the functional shifts in the\\n use of like around the ages of 7 to 9 is interpreted to show that peers become more important as linguistic role\\n models when children enter school. The results thus substantiate research which suggests that the pragmatic and social meanings of\\n discourse markers are learned alongside linguistic constraints rather than after the form has been acquired.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Functions of Language\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Functions of Language\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.20025.sch\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Functions of Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.20025.sch","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究基于儿童语言数据交换系统(CHILDES)的语言和读写能力发展家庭学校研究,分析了美国英语中类语篇的L1习得及其语用功能。数据显示,话语相似性已经存在于3岁和4岁儿童的言语中,即使是很小的儿童也会使用相似性来执行不同的语用功能,指定用途在8岁之前占主导地位;5.分析还显示,随着儿童的成熟,话语样态显著增加,主要是由注意力引导样态的增加驱动的,注意力引导样是话语样态在8岁以上儿童中的主导功能;5.条件推理树表明,儿童对类话语的使用受到儿童年龄、情境类型和照顾者输入中类话语频率的影响。7岁以下儿童;10如果他们的照顾者不经常使用类似话语,那么在正式场合和非正式场合很少使用类似话语。然而,如果孩子超过7岁,他们使用话语的方式会更像话语;10,或者在非正式环境中,当他们的照顾者频繁使用话语时。在7至9岁左右,同类语言使用频率的变化和功能的转变被解释为表明,当孩子入学时,同龄人作为语言榜样变得更加重要。因此,研究结果证实了这一研究,即话语标记的语用和社会意义是在语言约束的同时习得的,而不是在习得形式之后习得的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the L1-acquisition of the pragmatics of discourse like
This study analyzes the L1-acquisition of discourse like and its pragmatic functions in American English based on the Home-School Study of Language and Literacy Development component of the Child Language Data Exchange System (CHILDES). The data show that discourse like is already present in the speech of 3- and 4-year-old children and that even very young children employ like to perform distinct pragmatic functions with specifying uses being dominant until age 8;5. The analysis also shows a notable increase in discourse like as children mature, mainly driven by an increase in attention-directing like, the dominant function of discourse like among children older than 8;5. Conditional inference trees show that the use of discourse like by children is affected by a child’s age, the situation type and the frequency of discourse like in caregivers’ input. Children younger than 7;10 use discourse like only rarely in formal contexts as well as in informal contexts if their caregivers do not use discourse like frequently. However, children use discourse like substantially more if they are older than 7;10 or, in informal contexts, when their caregivers use discourse like frequently. The changes in frequency and the functional shifts in the use of like around the ages of 7 to 9 is interpreted to show that peers become more important as linguistic role models when children enter school. The results thus substantiate research which suggests that the pragmatic and social meanings of discourse markers are learned alongside linguistic constraints rather than after the form has been acquired.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Functions of Language is an international journal of linguistics which explores the functionalist perspective on the organisation and use of natural language. It encourages the interplay of theory and description, and provides space for the detailed analysis, qualitative or quantitative, of linguistic data from a broad range of languages. Its scope is broad, covering such matters as prosodic phenomena in phonology, the clause in its communicative context, and regularities of pragmatics, conversation and discourse, as well as the interaction between the various levels of analysis. The overall purpose is to contribute to our understanding of how the use of languages in speech and writing has impacted, and continues to impact, upon the structure of those languages.
期刊最新文献
The functions of evidentiality Review of Yus (2023): Pragmatics of internet humour Definite-like meaning of bare classifiers in Nung Cardinal direction judgment based on the integration of spatial reference frames in different languages Review of Kim, Martin, Shin & Choi (2023): Korean grammar: A systemic functional approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1