分析欧洲吹口哨指令和新法规的主要挑战。西班牙案例

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW Derecho PUCP Pub Date : 2020-11-26 DOI:10.18800/derechopucp.202002.003
José Santamaría, L. P. Gómez
{"title":"分析欧洲吹口哨指令和新法规的主要挑战。西班牙案例","authors":"José Santamaría, L. P. Gómez","doi":"10.18800/derechopucp.202002.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the approval of the European Directive 1937/2019 on October 23rd, that the countries of the European Union are required to transpose no later than two years after its entry into force, all companies, as well as public entities with more than fifty workers, must enable a whistleblower channel. The purpose of this article is to synthesize the main novelties that this norm introduces, highlighting the importance of initially reaching an agreement on the very definition of the informant. In Spain, the lack of regulation of this figure so far has led the doctrine to search for solutions in the general theory of crime, as well as in other disciplines of law, in order to solve the difficulties that have arisen with the use of reporting channels by companies that chosed to incorporate a compliance program. Finally, we will point out some of the problems arising from the transposition of the Directive from the perspective of its compatibility with the system of rights and guarantees that rule the criminal process. Along these lines, a harmonization of the newly released whistleblower’s apparent exemption from liability with the current Penal Code is proposed, also focused on the need to provide guarantees to internal investigations to preserve the validity of the evidence that may be obtained by them.","PeriodicalId":41953,"journal":{"name":"Derecho PUCP","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Análisis de la Directiva Europea de whistleblowing y principales retos de la nueva regulación. El caso de España\",\"authors\":\"José Santamaría, L. P. Gómez\",\"doi\":\"10.18800/derechopucp.202002.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the approval of the European Directive 1937/2019 on October 23rd, that the countries of the European Union are required to transpose no later than two years after its entry into force, all companies, as well as public entities with more than fifty workers, must enable a whistleblower channel. The purpose of this article is to synthesize the main novelties that this norm introduces, highlighting the importance of initially reaching an agreement on the very definition of the informant. In Spain, the lack of regulation of this figure so far has led the doctrine to search for solutions in the general theory of crime, as well as in other disciplines of law, in order to solve the difficulties that have arisen with the use of reporting channels by companies that chosed to incorporate a compliance program. Finally, we will point out some of the problems arising from the transposition of the Directive from the perspective of its compatibility with the system of rights and guarantees that rule the criminal process. Along these lines, a harmonization of the newly released whistleblower’s apparent exemption from liability with the current Penal Code is proposed, also focused on the need to provide guarantees to internal investigations to preserve the validity of the evidence that may be obtained by them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Derecho PUCP\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Derecho PUCP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202002.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Derecho PUCP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202002.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧盟第1937/2019号指令于10月23日获得批准,要求欧盟各国在其生效后不迟于两年内进行转换,所有公司以及拥有50名以上工人的公共实体都必须开通举报人渠道。本文的目的是综合这一规范引入的主要新奇之处,强调最初就举报人的定义达成一致的重要性。在西班牙,迄今为止缺乏对这一数字的监管,导致该学说在一般犯罪理论中寻找解决方案,以及在其他法律学科中,为了解决选择纳入合规计划的公司使用报告渠道所产生的困难。最后,我们将从该指令与统治刑事程序的权利和保障制度的兼容性的角度,指出该指令的转换所产生的一些问题。沿着这些思路,建议将新释放的举报人的明显免责与现行刑法相协调,也侧重于为内部调查提供保证,以保持他们可能获得的证据的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Análisis de la Directiva Europea de whistleblowing y principales retos de la nueva regulación. El caso de España
With the approval of the European Directive 1937/2019 on October 23rd, that the countries of the European Union are required to transpose no later than two years after its entry into force, all companies, as well as public entities with more than fifty workers, must enable a whistleblower channel. The purpose of this article is to synthesize the main novelties that this norm introduces, highlighting the importance of initially reaching an agreement on the very definition of the informant. In Spain, the lack of regulation of this figure so far has led the doctrine to search for solutions in the general theory of crime, as well as in other disciplines of law, in order to solve the difficulties that have arisen with the use of reporting channels by companies that chosed to incorporate a compliance program. Finally, we will point out some of the problems arising from the transposition of the Directive from the perspective of its compatibility with the system of rights and guarantees that rule the criminal process. Along these lines, a harmonization of the newly released whistleblower’s apparent exemption from liability with the current Penal Code is proposed, also focused on the need to provide guarantees to internal investigations to preserve the validity of the evidence that may be obtained by them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Las transgresiones respetuosas de la enseñanza del common law y el derecho civil en Quebec: lecciones del método transistémico de educación jurídica Violencia sexual y derecho penal: sobre los problemas contemporáneos en la interpretación del tipo penal de violación sexual en el Código Penal del Perú La formulación de un estándar normativo de imparcialidad que incorpore la imparcialidad objetivo-cognitiva en el ordenamiento jurídico peruano: un estudio sobre la repercusión de la jurisprudencia de los tribunales internacionales de derechos humanos Reflexiones sobre los fundamentos de la responsabilidad médica por wrongful life. ¿La vida como daño? Descripción de los riesgos y desafíos para la integridad académica de aplicaciones generativas de inteligencia artificial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1