欧洲联盟基于市场的环境政策组合的有效性

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Panoeconomicus Pub Date : 2020-05-20 DOI:10.2298/pan180111009r
I. Krištić, Jurica Šimurina
{"title":"欧洲联盟基于市场的环境政策组合的有效性","authors":"I. Krištić, Jurica Šimurina","doi":"10.2298/pan180111009r","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this paper is to analyze the effectiveness of the environmental taxes and emissions trading in achieving cleaner production, that is, higher production per unit of emissions in the European Union (EU). The hypothesis of the paper is that the combined use of taxes and emission permits yields synergistic benefits in addition to their individual contributions. The paper uses panel analysis on the EU27 data from 2005 to 2012. The analysis does not robustly find positive effects from the interaction of these policy instruments, but it confirms that there are no negative ones. Additional interesting results are that, on average, (i) the effects of both instruments on production cleanliness are more beneficial at the regulated industries than at the national level, (ii) emissions trading is more effective than taxes, (iii) both instruments are more effective in the EU15 than in the EU12, and (iv) crisis did not significantly affect production cleanliness in the EU.Key words: Effectiveness, Production cleanliness, Policy mix, Environmental taxes, EU ETS, Panel.JEL: E60, H20, Q50.","PeriodicalId":45222,"journal":{"name":"Panoeconomicus","volume":"1 1","pages":"9-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of the market-based environmental policy mix in the European Union\",\"authors\":\"I. Krištić, Jurica Šimurina\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/pan180111009r\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The goal of this paper is to analyze the effectiveness of the environmental taxes and emissions trading in achieving cleaner production, that is, higher production per unit of emissions in the European Union (EU). The hypothesis of the paper is that the combined use of taxes and emission permits yields synergistic benefits in addition to their individual contributions. The paper uses panel analysis on the EU27 data from 2005 to 2012. The analysis does not robustly find positive effects from the interaction of these policy instruments, but it confirms that there are no negative ones. Additional interesting results are that, on average, (i) the effects of both instruments on production cleanliness are more beneficial at the regulated industries than at the national level, (ii) emissions trading is more effective than taxes, (iii) both instruments are more effective in the EU15 than in the EU12, and (iv) crisis did not significantly affect production cleanliness in the EU.Key words: Effectiveness, Production cleanliness, Policy mix, Environmental taxes, EU ETS, Panel.JEL: E60, H20, Q50.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Panoeconomicus\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"9-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Panoeconomicus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/pan180111009r\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Panoeconomicus","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/pan180111009r","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目标是分析环境税和排放交易在实现清洁生产方面的有效性,即在欧盟(EU)提高单位排放量的产量。该论文的假设是,税收和排放许可证的结合使用除了各自的贡献之外,还产生了协同效益。本文对欧盟27国2005年至2012年的数据进行了面板分析。分析并没有有力地发现这些政策工具的相互作用产生的积极影响,但它证实了没有负面影响。其他有趣的结果是,平均而言,(i)这两种工具对生产清洁度的影响在受监管行业比在国家层面更有利,(ii)排放交易比税收更有效,(iii)这两项工具在欧盟15国比在欧盟12国更有效,以及(iv)危机没有显著影响欧盟的生产清洁度。关键词:有效性,生产清洁度,政策组合,环境税,欧盟排放交易系统,小组。JEL:E60,H20,Q50。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effectiveness of the market-based environmental policy mix in the European Union
The goal of this paper is to analyze the effectiveness of the environmental taxes and emissions trading in achieving cleaner production, that is, higher production per unit of emissions in the European Union (EU). The hypothesis of the paper is that the combined use of taxes and emission permits yields synergistic benefits in addition to their individual contributions. The paper uses panel analysis on the EU27 data from 2005 to 2012. The analysis does not robustly find positive effects from the interaction of these policy instruments, but it confirms that there are no negative ones. Additional interesting results are that, on average, (i) the effects of both instruments on production cleanliness are more beneficial at the regulated industries than at the national level, (ii) emissions trading is more effective than taxes, (iii) both instruments are more effective in the EU15 than in the EU12, and (iv) crisis did not significantly affect production cleanliness in the EU.Key words: Effectiveness, Production cleanliness, Policy mix, Environmental taxes, EU ETS, Panel.JEL: E60, H20, Q50.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Panoeconomicus
Panoeconomicus ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evolvability of cancer-associated genes under APOBEC3A/B selection. Toward a cashless society. Cash and non-cash payments in Spain, 1989-2014 The short- and long-run relationship between house prices and bank credit in developed and emerging market economies: A comparative study Skill versus inequality Volatility spillover networks of credit risk: Evidence from ASW and CDS spreads in Turkey and Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1