笔记——用转喻做事:来自加拿大戏剧的三个启示

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN CANADIAN LITERATURE Pub Date : 2020-11-12 DOI:10.14288/CL.VI241.192279
Dale Tracy
{"title":"笔记——用转喻做事:来自加拿大戏剧的三个启示","authors":"Dale Tracy","doi":"10.14288/CL.VI241.192279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building on Alicia Elliott’s exhortation to “do the work” in “CanLit is a Raging Dumpster Fire,” I pursue the metonymic after the metaphoric. In metaphor, one thing substitutes for another: the dumpster fire takes the place of the field of relations that creates the conditions for controversies and crises. In contrast, metonymy is contiguous: its readability depends on showing the conventional, assumed, or actual relationships between one thing and another. Metaphor conceals connections; metonymy works by virtue of them. Three recent Canadian plays help me think about what metonymy can add to discourse about doing the work: Daniel MacIvor’s Who Killed Spalding Gray? (2017), Jess Dobkin’s The Magic Hour (2017), and Marcus Youssef and James Long’s Winners and Losers (2015). My strategy is metonymical like “CanLit” is: I read each play for an insight it might offer within the signifying field of Canadian literature, culture, and nation.","PeriodicalId":44701,"journal":{"name":"CANADIAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Note—Doing the Work with Metonymy: Three Insights from Canadian Theatre\",\"authors\":\"Dale Tracy\",\"doi\":\"10.14288/CL.VI241.192279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Building on Alicia Elliott’s exhortation to “do the work” in “CanLit is a Raging Dumpster Fire,” I pursue the metonymic after the metaphoric. In metaphor, one thing substitutes for another: the dumpster fire takes the place of the field of relations that creates the conditions for controversies and crises. In contrast, metonymy is contiguous: its readability depends on showing the conventional, assumed, or actual relationships between one thing and another. Metaphor conceals connections; metonymy works by virtue of them. Three recent Canadian plays help me think about what metonymy can add to discourse about doing the work: Daniel MacIvor’s Who Killed Spalding Gray? (2017), Jess Dobkin’s The Magic Hour (2017), and Marcus Youssef and James Long’s Winners and Losers (2015). My strategy is metonymical like “CanLit” is: I read each play for an insight it might offer within the signifying field of Canadian literature, culture, and nation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CANADIAN LITERATURE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CANADIAN LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14288/CL.VI241.192279\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CANADIAN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14288/CL.VI241.192279","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

基于艾丽西亚·艾略特在《CanLit is a Raging Dumpster Fire》中对“做好工作”的告诫,我在隐喻之后追求转喻。在隐喻中,一件事代替了另一件事:垃圾箱大火取代了为争议和危机创造条件的关系领域。相反,转喻是连续的:它的可读性取决于显示一件事和另一件事之间的传统、假设或实际关系。隐喻隐藏着联系;转喻正是凭借它们而起作用的。最近的三部加拿大戏剧帮助我思考转喻可以为工作话语添加什么:丹尼尔·麦克伊沃的《谁杀了斯伯丁·格雷?(2017),杰西·多布金的《魔法时刻》(2017)以及马库斯·优素福和詹姆斯·朗的《赢家与输家》(2015)。我的策略是像《CanLit》一样的转喻:我阅读每一部戏剧,以了解它在加拿大文学、文化和国家的象征领域中可能提供的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Note—Doing the Work with Metonymy: Three Insights from Canadian Theatre
Building on Alicia Elliott’s exhortation to “do the work” in “CanLit is a Raging Dumpster Fire,” I pursue the metonymic after the metaphoric. In metaphor, one thing substitutes for another: the dumpster fire takes the place of the field of relations that creates the conditions for controversies and crises. In contrast, metonymy is contiguous: its readability depends on showing the conventional, assumed, or actual relationships between one thing and another. Metaphor conceals connections; metonymy works by virtue of them. Three recent Canadian plays help me think about what metonymy can add to discourse about doing the work: Daniel MacIvor’s Who Killed Spalding Gray? (2017), Jess Dobkin’s The Magic Hour (2017), and Marcus Youssef and James Long’s Winners and Losers (2015). My strategy is metonymical like “CanLit” is: I read each play for an insight it might offer within the signifying field of Canadian literature, culture, and nation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CANADIAN LITERATURE
CANADIAN LITERATURE LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Canadian Literature aims to foster a wider academic interest in the Canadian literary field, and publishes a wide range of material from Canadian and international scholars, writers, and poets. Each issue contains a variety of critical articles, an extensive book reviews section, and a selection of original poetry.
期刊最新文献
Where Was Here Presence of the Past Goodbye to Language Alice Munro’s “Providence,” Second-Wave Feminism, and the (Im)possibilities of Reconciling Motherhood and Liberation Playful Experiments with Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1