{"title":"罗斯之谜与智利宪法问题:另一种解读","authors":"Diego Pardo Álvarez","doi":"10.5354/0718-4735.2017.47962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolTomando como punto de partida el puzle constitucional de Alf Ross, Miriam Henriquez y George Lambeth defienden la validez de la modificacion de la potestad de reforma establecida en el capitulo XV de la Constitucion chilena. En el presente trabajo se critica la elaboracion de Henriquez y Lambeth, se introduce una aproximacion alternativa al puzle y se analizan ciertos aspectos del debate constitucional a la luz de tal interpretacion. EnglishTaking as a starting point Alf Ross’ constitutional puzzle, Miriam Henriquez and George Lambeth defend the validity of the modification of the amending power established in chapter XV of the Chilean Constitution. This paper critizes Henriquez’s and Lambeth’s elaboration, introduces an alternative approach to the puzzle and analyzes, in the light of such interpretation, certain aspects of the chilean constitutional debate","PeriodicalId":31642,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","volume":"1 1","pages":"81-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El puzle de Ross y el problema constitucional chileno: Una lectura alternativa\",\"authors\":\"Diego Pardo Álvarez\",\"doi\":\"10.5354/0718-4735.2017.47962\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"espanolTomando como punto de partida el puzle constitucional de Alf Ross, Miriam Henriquez y George Lambeth defienden la validez de la modificacion de la potestad de reforma establecida en el capitulo XV de la Constitucion chilena. En el presente trabajo se critica la elaboracion de Henriquez y Lambeth, se introduce una aproximacion alternativa al puzle y se analizan ciertos aspectos del debate constitucional a la luz de tal interpretacion. EnglishTaking as a starting point Alf Ross’ constitutional puzzle, Miriam Henriquez and George Lambeth defend the validity of the modification of the amending power established in chapter XV of the Chilean Constitution. This paper critizes Henriquez’s and Lambeth’s elaboration, introduces an alternative approach to the puzzle and analyzes, in the light of such interpretation, certain aspects of the chilean constitutional debate\",\"PeriodicalId\":31642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"81-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5354/0718-4735.2017.47962\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0718-4735.2017.47962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
El puzle de Ross y el problema constitucional chileno: Una lectura alternativa
espanolTomando como punto de partida el puzle constitucional de Alf Ross, Miriam Henriquez y George Lambeth defienden la validez de la modificacion de la potestad de reforma establecida en el capitulo XV de la Constitucion chilena. En el presente trabajo se critica la elaboracion de Henriquez y Lambeth, se introduce una aproximacion alternativa al puzle y se analizan ciertos aspectos del debate constitucional a la luz de tal interpretacion. EnglishTaking as a starting point Alf Ross’ constitutional puzzle, Miriam Henriquez and George Lambeth defend the validity of the modification of the amending power established in chapter XV of the Chilean Constitution. This paper critizes Henriquez’s and Lambeth’s elaboration, introduces an alternative approach to the puzzle and analyzes, in the light of such interpretation, certain aspects of the chilean constitutional debate