实践中的学习:中学教师在基于角色的实地体验中报告写作学习情况

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Literacy Research and Instruction Pub Date : 2022-09-09 DOI:10.1080/19388071.2022.2115958
Kristine E. Pytash, Denise N. Morgan, Elizabeth Testa
{"title":"实践中的学习:中学教师在基于角色的实地体验中报告写作学习情况","authors":"Kristine E. Pytash, Denise N. Morgan, Elizabeth Testa","doi":"10.1080/19388071.2022.2115958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Despite the importance of learning to teach writing, many preservice teachers do not take a writing course as part of their teacher preparation. For those universities that do offer a writing methods course, teacher educators face challenges in designing responsive and rigorous clinical experiences especially since writing is often under taught in middle and high schools. This qualitative study examines supportive clinical field experiences where preservice teachers apply and enhance what they learned in their methods courses. This study examined PSTs’ experiences learning about practice in practice when provided with specific roles to enact in the field: Lead Teacher, Secondary Teacher, Participation Partner, and Notetaker. Preservice teachers taught writing in teaching teams, once a week for seven weeks in an eighth-grade classroom. Preservice teachers responded to two open ended questions via google forms following their weekly field experience. In total, they made 377 comments within three categories: Understandings about Teaching (n = 169, 45%), Students (n = 90, 24%), and Writing (n = 118, 31%). A deeper analysis revealed that the roles made an important contribution to their learning by supporting their practice in practice and providing nuanced and rich opportunities for learning about the teaching of writing. Findings from this study demonstrate that preservice teachers benefit from collaborative field experiences learning about different aspects of how to teach writers when inhabiting different roles.","PeriodicalId":45434,"journal":{"name":"Literacy Research and Instruction","volume":"62 1","pages":"305 - 326"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning in Practice: What Preservice Teachers Report Learning about Writing in a Middle School Role Based Field Experience\",\"authors\":\"Kristine E. Pytash, Denise N. Morgan, Elizabeth Testa\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19388071.2022.2115958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Despite the importance of learning to teach writing, many preservice teachers do not take a writing course as part of their teacher preparation. For those universities that do offer a writing methods course, teacher educators face challenges in designing responsive and rigorous clinical experiences especially since writing is often under taught in middle and high schools. This qualitative study examines supportive clinical field experiences where preservice teachers apply and enhance what they learned in their methods courses. This study examined PSTs’ experiences learning about practice in practice when provided with specific roles to enact in the field: Lead Teacher, Secondary Teacher, Participation Partner, and Notetaker. Preservice teachers taught writing in teaching teams, once a week for seven weeks in an eighth-grade classroom. Preservice teachers responded to two open ended questions via google forms following their weekly field experience. In total, they made 377 comments within three categories: Understandings about Teaching (n = 169, 45%), Students (n = 90, 24%), and Writing (n = 118, 31%). A deeper analysis revealed that the roles made an important contribution to their learning by supporting their practice in practice and providing nuanced and rich opportunities for learning about the teaching of writing. Findings from this study demonstrate that preservice teachers benefit from collaborative field experiences learning about different aspects of how to teach writers when inhabiting different roles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Literacy Research and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"305 - 326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Literacy Research and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2022.2115958\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literacy Research and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2022.2115958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要尽管学习写作很重要,但许多职前教师并没有将写作课程作为教师准备的一部分。对于那些开设写作方法课程的大学来说,教师教育工作者在设计反应灵敏、严谨的临床体验方面面临挑战,尤其是因为在中学和高中,写作往往教学不足。这项定性研究考察了职前教师在方法课程中应用和加强所学知识的支持性临床现场经验。本研究考察了当被提供在该领域扮演的特定角色时,PST在实践中学习实践的经验:班主任、中学教师、参与伙伴和记笔记者。防腐老师在八年级的课堂上以小组形式教授写作,每周一次,为期七周。保护区教师在每周实地考察后,通过谷歌表格回答了两个开放式问题。他们总共在三类中发表了377条评论:对教学的理解(n=169,45%)、学生(n=90,24%)和写作(n=118,31%)。更深入的分析表明,这些角色在实践中支持他们的实践,并为学习写作教学提供了微妙而丰富的机会,从而对他们的学习做出了重要贡献。这项研究的结果表明,职前教师从合作的实地经验中受益,学习如何在扮演不同角色时教授作家的不同方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Learning in Practice: What Preservice Teachers Report Learning about Writing in a Middle School Role Based Field Experience
ABSTRACT Despite the importance of learning to teach writing, many preservice teachers do not take a writing course as part of their teacher preparation. For those universities that do offer a writing methods course, teacher educators face challenges in designing responsive and rigorous clinical experiences especially since writing is often under taught in middle and high schools. This qualitative study examines supportive clinical field experiences where preservice teachers apply and enhance what they learned in their methods courses. This study examined PSTs’ experiences learning about practice in practice when provided with specific roles to enact in the field: Lead Teacher, Secondary Teacher, Participation Partner, and Notetaker. Preservice teachers taught writing in teaching teams, once a week for seven weeks in an eighth-grade classroom. Preservice teachers responded to two open ended questions via google forms following their weekly field experience. In total, they made 377 comments within three categories: Understandings about Teaching (n = 169, 45%), Students (n = 90, 24%), and Writing (n = 118, 31%). A deeper analysis revealed that the roles made an important contribution to their learning by supporting their practice in practice and providing nuanced and rich opportunities for learning about the teaching of writing. Findings from this study demonstrate that preservice teachers benefit from collaborative field experiences learning about different aspects of how to teach writers when inhabiting different roles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Literacy Research and Instruction
Literacy Research and Instruction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Literacy Research and Instruction (formerly Reading Research and Instruction), the official journal of the College Reading Association, is an international refereed professional journal that publishes articles dealing with research and instruction in reading education and allied literacy fields. The journal is especially focused on instructional practices and applied or basic research of special interest to reading and literacy educators. Peer Review Policy: All articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by reviewers.
期刊最新文献
Empowering Adolescent Emergent Readers in Government Schools: An Exploration of Multimodal Texts as Pathways to Comprehension Novice Teachers’ Knowledge of Racial Literacies Effect of Dramatic Storytelling on Emergent Literacy in EFL: Evidence from the UAE Kindergartens Reexamining the Dolch Basic Sight Word List: Contemporary Considerations for Culturally Sustaining Approaches to Assess Sight Word Development A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Synchronous Paired Oral Reading Techniques in Elementary Classrooms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1