我们的感情怎么办?古怪的可塑性,冈特·安德斯和凯瑟琳·马勒博

B. Bösel
{"title":"我们的感情怎么办?古怪的可塑性,冈特·安德斯和凯瑟琳·马勒博","authors":"B. Bösel","doi":"10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2018.11.1.977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article draws a comparison between some motifs in the writings of Gunther Anders and Catherine Malabou. It begins with an outline of Malabou’s concept of (neuro)plasticity and its three main aspects and focuses on the importance of the notion of destructiveness as emphasised by the philosopher’s insistence on neurodegenerative maladies and sociopolitical trauma. Her notion of disaffection as a necessary component of plasticity is then paralleled to Anders’ critical engagement with modern technology and its tendency towards the destruction of humanity. His argument that the atom bomb forces us to realize that our ability to produce is so much greater than our abilities to imagine and to feel led him to a short but very dense discussion of what he called the “plasticity of feelings”, a notion that he developed alongside the visionary assertion of a historicity of feelings in general. In somewhat similar fashion to Malabou, Anders wants to sharpen our consciousness of the plasticity of feelings in order to make us feel the necessary amount of fear of our own potential destructiveness – and thus of the very real possibility that our affectivity might come to its own end. Malabou as well as Anders thus propose to take upon us an engagement with what usually is deemed “negative affect”, in order to counter the risk of a complete and final negation of affect.","PeriodicalId":30203,"journal":{"name":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","volume":"11 1","pages":"26-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Was tun mit unseren Gefühlen? Zur destruktiven Plastizität bei Günther Anders und Catherine Malabou\",\"authors\":\"B. Bösel\",\"doi\":\"10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2018.11.1.977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article draws a comparison between some motifs in the writings of Gunther Anders and Catherine Malabou. It begins with an outline of Malabou’s concept of (neuro)plasticity and its three main aspects and focuses on the importance of the notion of destructiveness as emphasised by the philosopher’s insistence on neurodegenerative maladies and sociopolitical trauma. Her notion of disaffection as a necessary component of plasticity is then paralleled to Anders’ critical engagement with modern technology and its tendency towards the destruction of humanity. His argument that the atom bomb forces us to realize that our ability to produce is so much greater than our abilities to imagine and to feel led him to a short but very dense discussion of what he called the “plasticity of feelings”, a notion that he developed alongside the visionary assertion of a historicity of feelings in general. In somewhat similar fashion to Malabou, Anders wants to sharpen our consciousness of the plasticity of feelings in order to make us feel the necessary amount of fear of our own potential destructiveness – and thus of the very real possibility that our affectivity might come to its own end. Malabou as well as Anders thus propose to take upon us an engagement with what usually is deemed “negative affect”, in order to counter the risk of a complete and final negation of affect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"26-39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2018.11.1.977\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2018.11.1.977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文比较了冈瑟·安德斯和凯瑟琳·马拉布作品中的一些母题。它首先概述了马拉布的(神经)可塑性概念及其三个主要方面,并着重于哲学家坚持神经退行性疾病和社会政治创伤所强调的破坏性概念的重要性。她认为不满是可塑性的必要组成部分,这与安德斯对现代技术及其毁灭人性的倾向的批判性参与是平行的。他认为,原子弹迫使我们意识到,我们的生产能力远远大于我们的想象和感受能力,这一观点让他对他所谓的“情感的可塑性”进行了简短但非常密集的讨论,这一概念是他与对一般情感的历史性的有远见的断言一起提出的。在某种程度上类似于Malabou,安德斯想要强化我们对情感可塑性的意识,以便让我们对自己潜在的破坏性感到必要的恐惧——因此,我们的情感可能会走向自己的尽头。因此,马拉布和安德斯建议我们与通常被认为是“消极情感”的东西接触,以对抗对情感的完全和最终否定的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Was tun mit unseren Gefühlen? Zur destruktiven Plastizität bei Günther Anders und Catherine Malabou
The article draws a comparison between some motifs in the writings of Gunther Anders and Catherine Malabou. It begins with an outline of Malabou’s concept of (neuro)plasticity and its three main aspects and focuses on the importance of the notion of destructiveness as emphasised by the philosopher’s insistence on neurodegenerative maladies and sociopolitical trauma. Her notion of disaffection as a necessary component of plasticity is then paralleled to Anders’ critical engagement with modern technology and its tendency towards the destruction of humanity. His argument that the atom bomb forces us to realize that our ability to produce is so much greater than our abilities to imagine and to feel led him to a short but very dense discussion of what he called the “plasticity of feelings”, a notion that he developed alongside the visionary assertion of a historicity of feelings in general. In somewhat similar fashion to Malabou, Anders wants to sharpen our consciousness of the plasticity of feelings in order to make us feel the necessary amount of fear of our own potential destructiveness – and thus of the very real possibility that our affectivity might come to its own end. Malabou as well as Anders thus propose to take upon us an engagement with what usually is deemed “negative affect”, in order to counter the risk of a complete and final negation of affect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Louise Amoore: Cloud Ethics. Algorithms and the Attributes of Ourselves and Others Editorial: Futures of Critique in the Digital Age „Wie ist Geschichte a priori möglich?“ Algorithmische Vorhersage und die Aufgabe der Kritik Distributed Planned Economies in the Age of their Technical Feasibility Landnahme, analog und digital. Ursprüngliche Akkumulation in den Kontrollgesellschaften
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1