不同面部类型患者颧骨下嵴骨厚的锥束ct比较

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Orthodontic Waves Pub Date : 2020-09-09 DOI:10.1080/13440241.2020.1814523
P. Paul, Anirudh Mathur, P. Chitra
{"title":"不同面部类型患者颧骨下嵴骨厚的锥束ct比较","authors":"P. Paul, Anirudh Mathur, P. Chitra","doi":"10.1080/13440241.2020.1814523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose To evaluate cortical bone thickness in the infra zygomatic crest region for subjects with low, normal and high angle facial patterns by bone mapping using cone beam computed tomography. Material and methods The study was conducted using CBCT images of 33 subjects, who were assigned to low-, normal- or high-angle groups. Cortical bone thickness was measured from the cementoenamel junction towards the maxillary sinus floor at heights of 8, 10, 12 and 14 mm along the mesial aspect of upper first molar, middle of the crown through the furcation area of the maxillary first molar, inter radicular bone/interdental region between the maxillary first and second molars, middle of the crown through the furcation area of the maxillary second molar and distal of the maxillary second molar. Results Low angle patients had significantly higher values of bone thickness compared to normal and high-angle patients between the first and second molars at a height of 12 mm and distal to second molars at a height of 14 mm. Conclusion The ideal site for insertion of temporary anchorage devices in the infrazygomatic crest region lies between the maxillary first and second molars at a height of 12 mm in all facial types. To avoid the risk of trauma or mini-implant failure, clinicians should be aware of the probability of thinner cortical bone in high angle patients as compared to normal and low angle patients.","PeriodicalId":43169,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontic Waves","volume":"79 1","pages":"99 - 104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13440241.2020.1814523","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cone beam computed tomographic comparison of infrazygomatic crest bone thickness in patients with different facial types\",\"authors\":\"P. Paul, Anirudh Mathur, P. Chitra\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13440241.2020.1814523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Purpose To evaluate cortical bone thickness in the infra zygomatic crest region for subjects with low, normal and high angle facial patterns by bone mapping using cone beam computed tomography. Material and methods The study was conducted using CBCT images of 33 subjects, who were assigned to low-, normal- or high-angle groups. Cortical bone thickness was measured from the cementoenamel junction towards the maxillary sinus floor at heights of 8, 10, 12 and 14 mm along the mesial aspect of upper first molar, middle of the crown through the furcation area of the maxillary first molar, inter radicular bone/interdental region between the maxillary first and second molars, middle of the crown through the furcation area of the maxillary second molar and distal of the maxillary second molar. Results Low angle patients had significantly higher values of bone thickness compared to normal and high-angle patients between the first and second molars at a height of 12 mm and distal to second molars at a height of 14 mm. Conclusion The ideal site for insertion of temporary anchorage devices in the infrazygomatic crest region lies between the maxillary first and second molars at a height of 12 mm in all facial types. To avoid the risk of trauma or mini-implant failure, clinicians should be aware of the probability of thinner cortical bone in high angle patients as compared to normal and low angle patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthodontic Waves\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"99 - 104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13440241.2020.1814523\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthodontic Waves\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13440241.2020.1814523\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontic Waves","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13440241.2020.1814523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

【摘要】目的应用锥形束计算机断层成像技术评估低角、正常角和高角面部模式受试者颧骨下区皮质骨厚度。材料与方法采用CBCT图像对33名受试者进行研究,将其分为低角度组、正常角度组和高角度组。测量沿上颌第一磨牙的中侧面,牙冠中部通过上颌第一磨牙的分叉区,上颌第一磨牙和第二磨牙之间的根间骨/牙间区,牙冠中部通过上颌第二磨牙的分叉区和上颌第二磨牙的远端,从牙髓-牙釉质交界处至上颌窦底8,10,12和14mm高度的骨皮质厚度。结果低角度患者的第一、第二磨牙高度为12 mm,远端至第二磨牙高度为14 mm,骨厚度值明显高于正常和高角度患者。结论颧骨下嵴区临时支抗的理想植入位置为上颌第一磨牙与第二磨牙之间高度12mm。为了避免创伤或微型种植体失败的风险,临床医生应该意识到与正常和低角度患者相比,高角度患者的皮质骨更薄的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cone beam computed tomographic comparison of infrazygomatic crest bone thickness in patients with different facial types
ABSTRACT Purpose To evaluate cortical bone thickness in the infra zygomatic crest region for subjects with low, normal and high angle facial patterns by bone mapping using cone beam computed tomography. Material and methods The study was conducted using CBCT images of 33 subjects, who were assigned to low-, normal- or high-angle groups. Cortical bone thickness was measured from the cementoenamel junction towards the maxillary sinus floor at heights of 8, 10, 12 and 14 mm along the mesial aspect of upper first molar, middle of the crown through the furcation area of the maxillary first molar, inter radicular bone/interdental region between the maxillary first and second molars, middle of the crown through the furcation area of the maxillary second molar and distal of the maxillary second molar. Results Low angle patients had significantly higher values of bone thickness compared to normal and high-angle patients between the first and second molars at a height of 12 mm and distal to second molars at a height of 14 mm. Conclusion The ideal site for insertion of temporary anchorage devices in the infrazygomatic crest region lies between the maxillary first and second molars at a height of 12 mm in all facial types. To avoid the risk of trauma or mini-implant failure, clinicians should be aware of the probability of thinner cortical bone in high angle patients as compared to normal and low angle patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthodontic Waves
Orthodontic Waves DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Orthodontic Waves is the official publication of the Japanese Orthodontic Society. The aim of this journal is to foster the advancement of orthodontic research and practice. The journal seeks to publish original articles (i) definitive reports of wide interest to the orthodontic community, (ii) Case Reports and (iii) Short Communications. Research papers stand on the scientific basis of orthodontics. Clinical topics covered include all techniques and approaches to treatment planning. All submissions are subject to peer review.
期刊最新文献
Condylectomy as a treatment approach to condylar hyperplasia Effectiveness of a fluoride-releasing orthodontic primer in reducing demineralization around brackets – a systematic review Updates on periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics Incidence of impacted teeth requiring fenestration, traction, and orthodontic treatment in Japan Bond strength of orthodontic buttons on clear aligner materials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1