文本可读性、理解性指导和学生参与:基于文本的社会研究教学中相关关系的检验

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Literacy Research and Instruction Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/19388071.2021.2008561
H. Schmitt, S. Witmer, S. S. Rowe
{"title":"文本可读性、理解性指导和学生参与:基于文本的社会研究教学中相关关系的检验","authors":"H. Schmitt, S. Witmer, S. S. Rowe","doi":"10.1080/19388071.2021.2008561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Reading comprehension instruction may be critical for students to learn from social studies text, particularly for students who are not yet proficient in reading. Understanding factors that correspond to high levels of student engagement during text-based social studies instruction appears particularly important. Data were collected from 50 fifth-grade classrooms during text-based social studies instruction to explore the extent to which reading comprehension instruction, text readability, and student reading achievement related to student engagement. Data collection included a variety of methods – observation, readability formula calculations, testing, and student ratings. Multi-level modeling was applied to examine the relationship between student – and classroom-level predictors and student engagement. Among the predictors, only student reading achievement was found to directly relate to student engagement. However, an interaction effect was identified whereby reading comprehension instruction was found to moderate the relationship between text readability and student engagement. These results indicate a need to consider text readability level when determining the level of comprehension instructional support to provide. Additional implications for future research and practice are offered.","PeriodicalId":45434,"journal":{"name":"Literacy Research and Instruction","volume":"61 1","pages":"62 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Text Readability, Comprehension Instruction, and Student Engagement: Examining Associated Relationships during Text-Based Social Studies Instruction\",\"authors\":\"H. Schmitt, S. Witmer, S. S. Rowe\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19388071.2021.2008561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Reading comprehension instruction may be critical for students to learn from social studies text, particularly for students who are not yet proficient in reading. Understanding factors that correspond to high levels of student engagement during text-based social studies instruction appears particularly important. Data were collected from 50 fifth-grade classrooms during text-based social studies instruction to explore the extent to which reading comprehension instruction, text readability, and student reading achievement related to student engagement. Data collection included a variety of methods – observation, readability formula calculations, testing, and student ratings. Multi-level modeling was applied to examine the relationship between student – and classroom-level predictors and student engagement. Among the predictors, only student reading achievement was found to directly relate to student engagement. However, an interaction effect was identified whereby reading comprehension instruction was found to moderate the relationship between text readability and student engagement. These results indicate a need to consider text readability level when determining the level of comprehension instructional support to provide. Additional implications for future research and practice are offered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Literacy Research and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"62 - 83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Literacy Research and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2021.2008561\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literacy Research and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2021.2008561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要阅读理解教学对于学生从社会研究文本中学习可能至关重要,尤其是对于尚未精通阅读的学生。在基于文本的社会研究教学中,理解与学生高水平参与度相对应的因素显得尤为重要。在基于文本的社会研究教学中,从50个五年级教室收集了数据,以探索阅读理解教学、文本可读性和学生阅读成绩与学生参与度的关系。数据收集包括各种方法——观察、可读性公式计算、测试和学生评分。采用多层次建模来检验学生和课堂水平的预测因素与学生参与度之间的关系。在预测因素中,只有学生的阅读成绩与学生的参与度直接相关。然而,发现了一种互动效应,即阅读理解教学可以调节文本可读性和学生参与度之间的关系。这些结果表明,在确定要提供的理解教学支持水平时,需要考虑文本可读性水平。对未来的研究和实践提供了额外的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Text Readability, Comprehension Instruction, and Student Engagement: Examining Associated Relationships during Text-Based Social Studies Instruction
ABSTRACT Reading comprehension instruction may be critical for students to learn from social studies text, particularly for students who are not yet proficient in reading. Understanding factors that correspond to high levels of student engagement during text-based social studies instruction appears particularly important. Data were collected from 50 fifth-grade classrooms during text-based social studies instruction to explore the extent to which reading comprehension instruction, text readability, and student reading achievement related to student engagement. Data collection included a variety of methods – observation, readability formula calculations, testing, and student ratings. Multi-level modeling was applied to examine the relationship between student – and classroom-level predictors and student engagement. Among the predictors, only student reading achievement was found to directly relate to student engagement. However, an interaction effect was identified whereby reading comprehension instruction was found to moderate the relationship between text readability and student engagement. These results indicate a need to consider text readability level when determining the level of comprehension instructional support to provide. Additional implications for future research and practice are offered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Literacy Research and Instruction
Literacy Research and Instruction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Literacy Research and Instruction (formerly Reading Research and Instruction), the official journal of the College Reading Association, is an international refereed professional journal that publishes articles dealing with research and instruction in reading education and allied literacy fields. The journal is especially focused on instructional practices and applied or basic research of special interest to reading and literacy educators. Peer Review Policy: All articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by reviewers.
期刊最新文献
Empowering Adolescent Emergent Readers in Government Schools: An Exploration of Multimodal Texts as Pathways to Comprehension Novice Teachers’ Knowledge of Racial Literacies Effect of Dramatic Storytelling on Emergent Literacy in EFL: Evidence from the UAE Kindergartens Reexamining the Dolch Basic Sight Word List: Contemporary Considerations for Culturally Sustaining Approaches to Assess Sight Word Development A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Synchronous Paired Oral Reading Techniques in Elementary Classrooms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1