基于正念的减压后压力、抑郁、焦虑和担忧症状改善的临床意义

H. Hazlett-Stevens
{"title":"基于正念的减压后压力、抑郁、焦虑和担忧症状改善的临床意义","authors":"H. Hazlett-Stevens","doi":"10.21926/obm.icm.2202022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) teaches mindfulness meditation to reduce stress, anxiety, depression, and related forms of distress among a variety of patients. Much research has documented statistically significant reductions across a variety of self-report measures following MBSR, but researchers rarely assessed and reported the clinical significance of MBSR symptom reduction in accordance with specific criteria famously established by Jacobson and Truax [1]. Patients reporting symptoms of anxiety, depression, and/or other stress-related concerns received MBSR in an outpatient mental health clinic. In order to assess the clinical significance of reported symptom reduction, specific criteria to determine reliable clinical improvement and recovery were applied to the data from each patient across the main symptom outcome measures. This secondary clinical significance analysis was conducted with all 23 patients who completed MBSR and completed assessment measures both before and after the intervention in the original open trial. A reliable change index and a cutoff point for outcome measures of worry, depression, anxiety, and stress were obtained so that reliable clinical improvement and recovery on each measure could be assessed for each patient. The proportion of patients who were elevated in the clinical range above the cutoff before the intervention was determined, as well as the proportion of those reporting symptom reduction, the proportion showing reliable improvement, and the proportion recovered at the final MBSR session. Clinical significance analyses revealed that over half of the patient sample scored in the clinical range on each measure before MBSR. At the end of the intervention, the vast majority of these patients reported symptom reduction, and depending on the measure, 45-69% of patients who were clinically elevated initially and reported symptom reduction following MBSR exhibited reliable clinical improvement. Furthermore, 29-50% of those patients showing reliable clinical improvement also met criteria as recovered at the conclusion of the MBSR program. These results suggest that the symptom reduction observed following MBSR is substantial and clinically meaningful for many patients – an outcome that cannot be determined with statistical tests of significance alone. Clinical significance criteria, such as those applied in this study, could be implemented in randomized controlled trial protocols to supplement conventional tests of statistical significance and shed light on how clinically meaningful obtained changes on outcome measures are for patients.","PeriodicalId":74333,"journal":{"name":"OBM integrative and complimentary medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Significance of Stress, Depression, Anxiety, and Worry Symptom Improvement Following Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction\",\"authors\":\"H. Hazlett-Stevens\",\"doi\":\"10.21926/obm.icm.2202022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) teaches mindfulness meditation to reduce stress, anxiety, depression, and related forms of distress among a variety of patients. Much research has documented statistically significant reductions across a variety of self-report measures following MBSR, but researchers rarely assessed and reported the clinical significance of MBSR symptom reduction in accordance with specific criteria famously established by Jacobson and Truax [1]. Patients reporting symptoms of anxiety, depression, and/or other stress-related concerns received MBSR in an outpatient mental health clinic. In order to assess the clinical significance of reported symptom reduction, specific criteria to determine reliable clinical improvement and recovery were applied to the data from each patient across the main symptom outcome measures. This secondary clinical significance analysis was conducted with all 23 patients who completed MBSR and completed assessment measures both before and after the intervention in the original open trial. A reliable change index and a cutoff point for outcome measures of worry, depression, anxiety, and stress were obtained so that reliable clinical improvement and recovery on each measure could be assessed for each patient. The proportion of patients who were elevated in the clinical range above the cutoff before the intervention was determined, as well as the proportion of those reporting symptom reduction, the proportion showing reliable improvement, and the proportion recovered at the final MBSR session. Clinical significance analyses revealed that over half of the patient sample scored in the clinical range on each measure before MBSR. At the end of the intervention, the vast majority of these patients reported symptom reduction, and depending on the measure, 45-69% of patients who were clinically elevated initially and reported symptom reduction following MBSR exhibited reliable clinical improvement. Furthermore, 29-50% of those patients showing reliable clinical improvement also met criteria as recovered at the conclusion of the MBSR program. These results suggest that the symptom reduction observed following MBSR is substantial and clinically meaningful for many patients – an outcome that cannot be determined with statistical tests of significance alone. Clinical significance criteria, such as those applied in this study, could be implemented in randomized controlled trial protocols to supplement conventional tests of statistical significance and shed light on how clinically meaningful obtained changes on outcome measures are for patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OBM integrative and complimentary medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OBM integrative and complimentary medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.icm.2202022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OBM integrative and complimentary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.icm.2202022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

基于正念的减压(MBSR)教授正念冥想,以减轻各种患者的压力、焦虑、抑郁和相关形式的痛苦。许多研究记录了MBSR后各种自我报告措施的统计学显著减少,但研究人员很少根据Jacobson和Truax[1]著名的特定标准评估和报告MBSR症状减少的临床意义。报告焦虑、抑郁和/或其他压力相关症状的患者在门诊心理健康诊所接受MBSR。为了评估报告的症状减轻的临床意义,将确定可靠临床改善和恢复的具体标准应用于每个患者的主要症状结果测量数据。这项次要临床意义分析是对所有23名完成MBSR并在原始开放试验干预前后完成评估措施的患者进行的。获得了一个可靠的变化指数和担忧、抑郁、焦虑和压力的结果测量的临界点,以便评估每个患者在每个测量方面的可靠临床改善和恢复。确定干预前在临床范围内高于临界值的患者比例,以及报告症状减轻的患者比例、显示可靠改善的比例和在最后一次MBSR治疗中康复的比例。临床显著性分析显示,超过一半的患者样本在MBSR前的每项测量中得分在临床范围内。在干预结束时,这些患者中的绝大多数报告症状减轻,根据测量结果,45-69%的最初临床升高并报告MBSR后症状减轻的患者表现出可靠的临床改善。此外,显示出可靠临床改善的患者中,29-50%在MBSR项目结束时也符合康复标准。这些结果表明,MBSR后观察到的症状减轻对许多患者来说是实质性的和有临床意义的——这一结果不能仅靠具有显著性的统计测试来确定。临床显著性标准,如本研究中应用的标准,可以在随机对照试验方案中实施,以补充具有统计学显著性的常规测试,并阐明患者在结果测量方面获得的具有临床意义的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Significance of Stress, Depression, Anxiety, and Worry Symptom Improvement Following Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction
Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) teaches mindfulness meditation to reduce stress, anxiety, depression, and related forms of distress among a variety of patients. Much research has documented statistically significant reductions across a variety of self-report measures following MBSR, but researchers rarely assessed and reported the clinical significance of MBSR symptom reduction in accordance with specific criteria famously established by Jacobson and Truax [1]. Patients reporting symptoms of anxiety, depression, and/or other stress-related concerns received MBSR in an outpatient mental health clinic. In order to assess the clinical significance of reported symptom reduction, specific criteria to determine reliable clinical improvement and recovery were applied to the data from each patient across the main symptom outcome measures. This secondary clinical significance analysis was conducted with all 23 patients who completed MBSR and completed assessment measures both before and after the intervention in the original open trial. A reliable change index and a cutoff point for outcome measures of worry, depression, anxiety, and stress were obtained so that reliable clinical improvement and recovery on each measure could be assessed for each patient. The proportion of patients who were elevated in the clinical range above the cutoff before the intervention was determined, as well as the proportion of those reporting symptom reduction, the proportion showing reliable improvement, and the proportion recovered at the final MBSR session. Clinical significance analyses revealed that over half of the patient sample scored in the clinical range on each measure before MBSR. At the end of the intervention, the vast majority of these patients reported symptom reduction, and depending on the measure, 45-69% of patients who were clinically elevated initially and reported symptom reduction following MBSR exhibited reliable clinical improvement. Furthermore, 29-50% of those patients showing reliable clinical improvement also met criteria as recovered at the conclusion of the MBSR program. These results suggest that the symptom reduction observed following MBSR is substantial and clinically meaningful for many patients – an outcome that cannot be determined with statistical tests of significance alone. Clinical significance criteria, such as those applied in this study, could be implemented in randomized controlled trial protocols to supplement conventional tests of statistical significance and shed light on how clinically meaningful obtained changes on outcome measures are for patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nature Connection, Mindfulness, and Wellbeing: A Network Analysis Possibilities of Predicting a Person's Substance Use Behaviour and Mental Health Through Social Media in a COVID-19 Crisis Context Sleep Quality, Sleep Efficiency, and Perceived Stress after Synchronous Virtual Mindfulness Meditation Sessions for Higher Education Students Report from the 11th International Symposium on Auriculotherapy Held in Copenhagen, 8-10 September 2023 - Auriculotherapy meets the field of Psychology Welcoming the “Metaverse” in Integrative and Complementary Medicine: Introductory Overview
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1