个人自主是道德工作伦理的核心原则:知情同意还是自传?

Q3 Arts and Humanities Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI:10.22613/zfpp/6.1.4
F. Bögner
{"title":"个人自主是道德工作伦理的核心原则:知情同意还是自传?","authors":"F. Bögner","doi":"10.22613/zfpp/6.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following considerations are concerned with the question, what conception of autonomy for common morally relevant scenarios of social work is applicable as well as philosophically well founded. In order to answer this question I will focus on the thought to connect autonomy closely with the duty to obtain informed consent of clients to steps of the intervention. Subsequently, I will determine in how far this connection can be adequate for the moral praxis of social work. Based on se92 Personale Autonomie als ein Kernprinzip der Ethik Sozialer Arbeit lected features of Beauchamp’s and Childress’ medical ethics I will then demonstrate that a conception of autonomy, which concentrates on obtaining informed consent, is not adequate for social work contexts, since it is not compatible with several features of social work interventions. In many contexts of social work, a conception of autonomy that includes in its criteria the biography of clients is far more adequate. In order to substantiate this claim, I will refer to the conception of personal autonomy","PeriodicalId":53352,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personale Autonomie als ein Kernprinzip der Ethik Sozialer Arbeit: informierte Einwilligung oder Biographie?\",\"authors\":\"F. Bögner\",\"doi\":\"10.22613/zfpp/6.1.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The following considerations are concerned with the question, what conception of autonomy for common morally relevant scenarios of social work is applicable as well as philosophically well founded. In order to answer this question I will focus on the thought to connect autonomy closely with the duty to obtain informed consent of clients to steps of the intervention. Subsequently, I will determine in how far this connection can be adequate for the moral praxis of social work. Based on se92 Personale Autonomie als ein Kernprinzip der Ethik Sozialer Arbeit lected features of Beauchamp’s and Childress’ medical ethics I will then demonstrate that a conception of autonomy, which concentrates on obtaining informed consent, is not adequate for social work contexts, since it is not compatible with several features of social work interventions. In many contexts of social work, a conception of autonomy that includes in its criteria the biography of clients is far more adequate. In order to substantiate this claim, I will refer to the conception of personal autonomy\",\"PeriodicalId\":53352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22613/zfpp/6.1.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22613/zfpp/6.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

下面的考虑是关于这个问题的,对于社会工作中常见的道德相关场景,什么样的自治概念是适用的,并且在哲学上是有根据的。为了回答这个问题,我将重点关注将自主权与获得客户知情同意的责任紧密联系起来的想法。随后,我将确定这种联系在多大程度上适合社会工作的道德实践。基于se92 Personale Autonomie als静脉Kernprinzip der Ethik Sozialer劳动收的特征波和切尔德里斯的医学伦理我将证明一个自治的概念,这集中于获得知情同意,没有足够的社会工作环境,因为它不符合社会工作干预的几个特征。在社会工作的许多背景下,在其标准中包含客户传记的自主性概念要充分得多。为了证实这一说法,我将参考个人自主的概念
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Personale Autonomie als ein Kernprinzip der Ethik Sozialer Arbeit: informierte Einwilligung oder Biographie?
The following considerations are concerned with the question, what conception of autonomy for common morally relevant scenarios of social work is applicable as well as philosophically well founded. In order to answer this question I will focus on the thought to connect autonomy closely with the duty to obtain informed consent of clients to steps of the intervention. Subsequently, I will determine in how far this connection can be adequate for the moral praxis of social work. Based on se92 Personale Autonomie als ein Kernprinzip der Ethik Sozialer Arbeit lected features of Beauchamp’s and Childress’ medical ethics I will then demonstrate that a conception of autonomy, which concentrates on obtaining informed consent, is not adequate for social work contexts, since it is not compatible with several features of social work interventions. In many contexts of social work, a conception of autonomy that includes in its criteria the biography of clients is far more adequate. In order to substantiate this claim, I will refer to the conception of personal autonomy
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie
Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Dekoloniale Ethik und die Grenzen der Redefreiheit Gegenrede Verschwörungserzählungen im Kontext der Wissenschaftsleugnung Frei reden dürfen, aber es doch nicht sollen? Redefreiheit als Befähigung zur öffentlichen Rede
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1