Kelly Irene O'Brien, Swathi Ravichandran, M. Brodke
{"title":"员工建言与感知控制:远程工作环境重要吗?","authors":"Kelly Irene O'Brien, Swathi Ravichandran, M. Brodke","doi":"10.1108/ebhrm-12-2022-0288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study's purpose is to explore the difference in employee voice behavior along with its modalities and employee perceived control in a remote vs an in-office work situation.Design/methodology/approachEmployees who worked remotely and in-person at a local municipal government in the Great Lakes Region of the United States were surveyed.Findings Findings suggest voice behavior and perceived control are stable attitudes and not impacted by a move from in-person to remote work. Participants indicated both Zoom staff meetings and Zoom one-to-one meetings with their supervisor were important; however, only Zoom one-to-one meetings with the supervisor were indicated to be satisfactory.Practical implicationsThis study suggests that organizations considering moving some of their operations to a fully remote work situation would not experience differences in employee voice or perceived control. Implications related to utilizing specific communication modalities are also discussed.Originality/valueThis is the only study that focuses on differences in employee voice, its modalities and perceived control comparing in-person vs remote work.","PeriodicalId":51902,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based HRM-A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Employee voice behavior and perceived control: does remote work environment matter?\",\"authors\":\"Kelly Irene O'Brien, Swathi Ravichandran, M. Brodke\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ebhrm-12-2022-0288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis study's purpose is to explore the difference in employee voice behavior along with its modalities and employee perceived control in a remote vs an in-office work situation.Design/methodology/approachEmployees who worked remotely and in-person at a local municipal government in the Great Lakes Region of the United States were surveyed.Findings Findings suggest voice behavior and perceived control are stable attitudes and not impacted by a move from in-person to remote work. Participants indicated both Zoom staff meetings and Zoom one-to-one meetings with their supervisor were important; however, only Zoom one-to-one meetings with the supervisor were indicated to be satisfactory.Practical implicationsThis study suggests that organizations considering moving some of their operations to a fully remote work situation would not experience differences in employee voice or perceived control. Implications related to utilizing specific communication modalities are also discussed.Originality/valueThis is the only study that focuses on differences in employee voice, its modalities and perceived control comparing in-person vs remote work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-based HRM-A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-based HRM-A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ebhrm-12-2022-0288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based HRM-A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ebhrm-12-2022-0288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
Employee voice behavior and perceived control: does remote work environment matter?
PurposeThis study's purpose is to explore the difference in employee voice behavior along with its modalities and employee perceived control in a remote vs an in-office work situation.Design/methodology/approachEmployees who worked remotely and in-person at a local municipal government in the Great Lakes Region of the United States were surveyed.Findings Findings suggest voice behavior and perceived control are stable attitudes and not impacted by a move from in-person to remote work. Participants indicated both Zoom staff meetings and Zoom one-to-one meetings with their supervisor were important; however, only Zoom one-to-one meetings with the supervisor were indicated to be satisfactory.Practical implicationsThis study suggests that organizations considering moving some of their operations to a fully remote work situation would not experience differences in employee voice or perceived control. Implications related to utilizing specific communication modalities are also discussed.Originality/valueThis is the only study that focuses on differences in employee voice, its modalities and perceived control comparing in-person vs remote work.