一堆树叶或同路人

IF 0.2 Q4 AREA STUDIES Inner Asia Pub Date : 2022-10-12 DOI:10.1163/22105018-02302029
A. Zhanaev
{"title":"一堆树叶或同路人","authors":"A. Zhanaev","doi":"10.1163/22105018-02302029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nMuch has been written about the role of ‘shamanism’ in the making of Mongol kinship. This article aims to explore the role of Buddhism in constructing kinship, which has received less scholarly attention. In particular, I investigate the ways the ‘anti-family’ orientation of Buddhism was propagated in Buryat society, which had assigned great social importance to kinship networks. In didactic texts compiled by Buryat lamas for the laity in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, lamas argued that, despite the impermanent character of kinship, kinship bonds nevertheless were to be arranged in a proper way to avoid multiplying sins. However, lamas did not offer a ready model or a special Buddhist ideal of the family organisation. Like in other regional contexts, Buddhist ethics were adapted to the existing cultural traditions and mostly emphasised proper roles and responsibilities in conjugal and parent-child relationships.","PeriodicalId":43430,"journal":{"name":"Inner Asia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Heap of Leaves or Fellow Travellers\",\"authors\":\"A. Zhanaev\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22105018-02302029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nMuch has been written about the role of ‘shamanism’ in the making of Mongol kinship. This article aims to explore the role of Buddhism in constructing kinship, which has received less scholarly attention. In particular, I investigate the ways the ‘anti-family’ orientation of Buddhism was propagated in Buryat society, which had assigned great social importance to kinship networks. In didactic texts compiled by Buryat lamas for the laity in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, lamas argued that, despite the impermanent character of kinship, kinship bonds nevertheless were to be arranged in a proper way to avoid multiplying sins. However, lamas did not offer a ready model or a special Buddhist ideal of the family organisation. Like in other regional contexts, Buddhist ethics were adapted to the existing cultural traditions and mostly emphasised proper roles and responsibilities in conjugal and parent-child relationships.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inner Asia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inner Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22105018-02302029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inner Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22105018-02302029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于“萨满教”在蒙古血缘关系的形成中所起的作用,已经写了很多。本文旨在探讨佛教在构建亲属关系中的作用,这是学术界关注较少的问题。特别是,我研究了佛教的“反家庭”取向在布里亚特社会的传播方式,布里亚特社会赋予了亲属网络很大的社会重要性。在19世纪和20世纪初布里亚特喇嘛为俗人编写的说教文本中,喇嘛们认为,尽管亲属关系具有无常的特征,但亲属关系仍应以适当的方式安排,以避免增加罪恶。然而,喇嘛并没有提供一个现成的模式,也没有提供一个特殊的佛教家庭组织理想。与其他地区的情况一样,佛教伦理适应了现有的文化传统,主要强调夫妻和亲子关系中的适当角色和责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Heap of Leaves or Fellow Travellers
Much has been written about the role of ‘shamanism’ in the making of Mongol kinship. This article aims to explore the role of Buddhism in constructing kinship, which has received less scholarly attention. In particular, I investigate the ways the ‘anti-family’ orientation of Buddhism was propagated in Buryat society, which had assigned great social importance to kinship networks. In didactic texts compiled by Buryat lamas for the laity in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, lamas argued that, despite the impermanent character of kinship, kinship bonds nevertheless were to be arranged in a proper way to avoid multiplying sins. However, lamas did not offer a ready model or a special Buddhist ideal of the family organisation. Like in other regional contexts, Buddhist ethics were adapted to the existing cultural traditions and mostly emphasised proper roles and responsibilities in conjugal and parent-child relationships.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Inner Asia
Inner Asia AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Inner Asia Studies Unit (MIASU) was founded in 1986 as a group within the Department of Social Anthropology to promote research and teaching relating to Mongolia and Inner Asia on an inter-disciplinary basis. The unit aims to promote and encourage study of this important region within and without the University of cambridge, and to provide training and support for research to all those concerned with its understanding. It is currently one of the very few research-oriented forums in the world in which scholars can address the contemporary and historical problems of the region.
期刊最新文献
Chanting Ancestors’ Names The Rise of the Mongols: Five Chinese Sources. Edited and translated, with an Introduction, by Christopher P. Atwood, edited by Christopher P. Atwood Social and Economic Aspects of the Kuhmarim–Sehwalim Mazar in Khotan An Ephemeral State on the Enduring Steppe Urban Hunters: Dealing and Dreaming in Times of Transition, written by Lars Højer & Morten Axel Pedersen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1