在乘法概念场中寻求一致性:一种知识碎片的描述

IF 2.3 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Cognition and Instruction Pub Date : 2021-10-27 DOI:10.1080/07370008.2021.1990296
Andrew Izsák, S. Beckmann, Joy Stark
{"title":"在乘法概念场中寻求一致性:一种知识碎片的描述","authors":"Andrew Izsák, S. Beckmann, Joy Stark","doi":"10.1080/07370008.2021.1990296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The present study is motivated by a significant body of research documenting teachers’ perennial difficulties with a critical swath of topics related to multiplication. In response, we track how Nina, a future middle grades mathematics teacher, made progress constructing explanations across topics by reasoning with measurement-based definitions of multiplication and of fractions and by coordinating symbolic representations with math drawings. The dataset spans 1 semester of Nina’s in-class work during a content course—explicitly designed to foster coherence within the multiplicative conceptual field—as well as her written assignments for the course and her moment-to-moment reasoning during three interviews conducted near the beginning, middle, and end of the semester. A main result is that constructs from coordination class theory, a strand of theory within the knowledge-in-pieces epistemological perspective, were particularly useful for tracking and explaining Nina’s piecemeal progress. The broad contribution of the article is two-fold—(a) a shift in focus from research on reasoning about one or two topics toward reasoning across a wider range of topics related to multiplication and (b) highlighting refinement and coordination of knowledge resources as basic processes by which future teachers can progress toward coherent understandings of critical school mathematics content.","PeriodicalId":47945,"journal":{"name":"Cognition and Instruction","volume":"40 1","pages":"305 - 350"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seeking Coherence in the Multiplicative Conceptual Field: A Knowledge-in-Pieces Account\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Izsák, S. Beckmann, Joy Stark\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07370008.2021.1990296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The present study is motivated by a significant body of research documenting teachers’ perennial difficulties with a critical swath of topics related to multiplication. In response, we track how Nina, a future middle grades mathematics teacher, made progress constructing explanations across topics by reasoning with measurement-based definitions of multiplication and of fractions and by coordinating symbolic representations with math drawings. The dataset spans 1 semester of Nina’s in-class work during a content course—explicitly designed to foster coherence within the multiplicative conceptual field—as well as her written assignments for the course and her moment-to-moment reasoning during three interviews conducted near the beginning, middle, and end of the semester. A main result is that constructs from coordination class theory, a strand of theory within the knowledge-in-pieces epistemological perspective, were particularly useful for tracking and explaining Nina’s piecemeal progress. The broad contribution of the article is two-fold—(a) a shift in focus from research on reasoning about one or two topics toward reasoning across a wider range of topics related to multiplication and (b) highlighting refinement and coordination of knowledge resources as basic processes by which future teachers can progress toward coherent understandings of critical school mathematics content.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognition and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"305 - 350\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognition and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2021.1990296\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2021.1990296","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:本研究的动机是一个重要的研究机构,记录了教师在与乘法相关的一系列关键主题方面的长期困难。作为回应,我们跟踪了未来的中学数学教师Nina如何通过基于乘法和分数的测量定义进行推理,并通过协调数学图形的符号表示,在构建跨主题的解释方面取得进展。该数据集涵盖了Nina在内容课程中的一个学期的课堂作业,该课程旨在促进乘法概念领域的一致性,以及她在课程的书面作业和在学期开始、中期和结束时进行的三次访谈中的实时推理。一个主要的结果是,从协调类理论(知识片段认识论观点中的一种理论)出发的结构,对于跟踪和解释尼娜的零碎进展特别有用。这篇文章的广泛贡献是双重的——(a)将重点从研究一个或两个主题的推理转向了与乘法相关的更广泛主题的推理;(b)强调了知识资源的提炼和协调,作为基本过程,未来的教师可以通过这些过程向对关键学校数学内容的连贯理解发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Seeking Coherence in the Multiplicative Conceptual Field: A Knowledge-in-Pieces Account
Abstract The present study is motivated by a significant body of research documenting teachers’ perennial difficulties with a critical swath of topics related to multiplication. In response, we track how Nina, a future middle grades mathematics teacher, made progress constructing explanations across topics by reasoning with measurement-based definitions of multiplication and of fractions and by coordinating symbolic representations with math drawings. The dataset spans 1 semester of Nina’s in-class work during a content course—explicitly designed to foster coherence within the multiplicative conceptual field—as well as her written assignments for the course and her moment-to-moment reasoning during three interviews conducted near the beginning, middle, and end of the semester. A main result is that constructs from coordination class theory, a strand of theory within the knowledge-in-pieces epistemological perspective, were particularly useful for tracking and explaining Nina’s piecemeal progress. The broad contribution of the article is two-fold—(a) a shift in focus from research on reasoning about one or two topics toward reasoning across a wider range of topics related to multiplication and (b) highlighting refinement and coordination of knowledge resources as basic processes by which future teachers can progress toward coherent understandings of critical school mathematics content.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
12.10%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Among education journals, Cognition and Instruction"s distinctive niche is rigorous study of foundational issues concerning the mental, socio-cultural, and mediational processes and conditions of learning and intellectual competence. For these purposes, both “cognition” and “instruction” must be interpreted broadly. The journal preferentially attends to the “how” of learning and intellectual practices. A balance of well-reasoned theory and careful and reflective empirical technique is typical.
期刊最新文献
Teacher Cultivation of Classroom Statistical Modeling Practice: A Case Study Learning Inside the School, but Outside the Curriculum: An Extreme Case of Interest-Driven Learning in Alternative STEAM Learning Infrastructure for Schools The Intertwining of Children’s Interests and Micro-Practices at a Science Museum: Case Study of Three Children The Problem With Perspective: Students’ and Teachers’ Reasoning About Credibility During Discussions of Online Sources Collaborative Troubleshooting in STEM: A Case Study of High School Students Finding and Fixing Code, Circuit and Craft Challenges in Electronic Textiles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1