Peter Schmelz,《声波过载:阿尔弗雷德·施尼特克、瓦伦丁·西尔维斯特罗夫和苏联晚期的多体主义》(纽约:牛津大学出版社,2021),ISBN:978-0-19754-125-8(hb)。

IF 0.5 2区 艺术学 0 MUSIC Twentieth-Century Music Pub Date : 2022-09-23 DOI:10.1017/S1478572222000196
G. Cornish
{"title":"Peter Schmelz,《声波过载:阿尔弗雷德·施尼特克、瓦伦丁·西尔维斯特罗夫和苏联晚期的多体主义》(纽约:牛津大学出版社,2021),ISBN:978-0-19754-125-8(hb)。","authors":"G. Cornish","doi":"10.1017/S1478572222000196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What happened to the Soviet seventies? Conventional wisdom carves the Soviet Union into a series of alternatingly repressive and progressive (or, at the very least, less repressive) regimes. After Lenin’s death in 1924, the utopian underpinnings of the Bolshevik Revolution gave way to the terrors of Stalinism. Coming to power in 1956, Nikita Khrushchev denounced his predecessor’s ‘cult of personality’ and loosened restrictions on domestic and cultural life. Following a period of discontent within the Soviet Central Committee, Leonid Brezhnev spearheaded Khrushchev’s ousting and, in 1964, assumed power; he would lead the Communist Party for nearly twenty years, until his death in November 1982. In a sort of interregnum, the next two general secretaries, Yuri Andropov and Konstantin Chernenko, lasted just over a year each before dying suddenly, at which point Mikhail Gorbachev, the great progressive, came to power and opened the country to those both within and without. For historians of the Soviet Union – and, indeed, music scholars who study the region – much ink has been spilled on the eras of Lenin, Stalin, Khrushchev, and Gorbachev. Yet the tenure of Brezhnev, whose stay in power was second in length only to Stalin’s, has long been overlooked. Much of this has to do with its sobriquet, ‘Stagnation’, which allegedly spoke to the era’s political, economic, and creative malaise. In recent years, however, historians of the Soviet Union have increasingly called these notions into question. Were the Soviet seventies really stagnant? Did the vibrant cultural life of the Thaw just disappear? And how did we get from the Thaw to Gorbachev’s reforms? Upon closer inspection, the Stagnation was not particularly stagnant – and, indeed, as scholars such as Christine Evans, Gulnaz Sharafutdinova, Neringa Klumbytė, and Juliane Fürst have argued, it was a period of great experimentation and innovation. Music studies still has some catching up to do in this area, but Peter Schmelz’s excellent book Sonic Overload: Alfred Schnittke, Valentin Silvestrov, and Polystylism in the Late USSR is an exciting and pathbreaking look into the Soviet seventies. Through close study of biography, published materials, critical reception, and scores, Schmelz both revisits the","PeriodicalId":43259,"journal":{"name":"Twentieth-Century Music","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peter Schmelz, Sonic Overload: Alfred Schnittke, Valentin Silvestrov, and Polystylism in the Late USSR (New York: Oxford University Press, 2021), ISBN: 978-0-19754-125-8 (hb).\",\"authors\":\"G. Cornish\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1478572222000196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What happened to the Soviet seventies? Conventional wisdom carves the Soviet Union into a series of alternatingly repressive and progressive (or, at the very least, less repressive) regimes. After Lenin’s death in 1924, the utopian underpinnings of the Bolshevik Revolution gave way to the terrors of Stalinism. Coming to power in 1956, Nikita Khrushchev denounced his predecessor’s ‘cult of personality’ and loosened restrictions on domestic and cultural life. Following a period of discontent within the Soviet Central Committee, Leonid Brezhnev spearheaded Khrushchev’s ousting and, in 1964, assumed power; he would lead the Communist Party for nearly twenty years, until his death in November 1982. In a sort of interregnum, the next two general secretaries, Yuri Andropov and Konstantin Chernenko, lasted just over a year each before dying suddenly, at which point Mikhail Gorbachev, the great progressive, came to power and opened the country to those both within and without. For historians of the Soviet Union – and, indeed, music scholars who study the region – much ink has been spilled on the eras of Lenin, Stalin, Khrushchev, and Gorbachev. Yet the tenure of Brezhnev, whose stay in power was second in length only to Stalin’s, has long been overlooked. Much of this has to do with its sobriquet, ‘Stagnation’, which allegedly spoke to the era’s political, economic, and creative malaise. In recent years, however, historians of the Soviet Union have increasingly called these notions into question. Were the Soviet seventies really stagnant? Did the vibrant cultural life of the Thaw just disappear? And how did we get from the Thaw to Gorbachev’s reforms? Upon closer inspection, the Stagnation was not particularly stagnant – and, indeed, as scholars such as Christine Evans, Gulnaz Sharafutdinova, Neringa Klumbytė, and Juliane Fürst have argued, it was a period of great experimentation and innovation. Music studies still has some catching up to do in this area, but Peter Schmelz’s excellent book Sonic Overload: Alfred Schnittke, Valentin Silvestrov, and Polystylism in the Late USSR is an exciting and pathbreaking look into the Soviet seventies. Through close study of biography, published materials, critical reception, and scores, Schmelz both revisits the\",\"PeriodicalId\":43259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Twentieth-Century Music\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Twentieth-Century Music\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478572222000196\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twentieth-Century Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478572222000196","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

苏联70年代发生了什么?传统智慧将苏联塑造成一系列交替的专制和进步(或者,至少,不那么专制)政权。1924年列宁去世后,布尔什维克革命的乌托邦基础被斯大林主义的恐怖所取代。1956年上台后,尼基塔·赫鲁晓夫谴责了前任的“个人崇拜”,并放松了对家庭和文化生活的限制。在苏联中央委员会内部不满一段时间后,列昂尼德·布列日涅夫带头推翻赫鲁晓夫,并于1964年掌权;他将领导共产党近20年,直到1982年11月去世。在某种程度上,接下来的两位总书记,尤里·安德罗波夫和康斯坦丁·切尔年科,任期仅一年多,然后突然去世。此时,伟大的进步主义者米哈伊尔·戈尔巴乔夫上台,向内外开放了国家。对于苏联历史学家——事实上,对于研究该地区的音乐学者来说——列宁、斯大林、赫鲁晓夫和戈尔巴乔夫的时代已经被泼墨了很多。然而,勃列日涅夫的任期一直被忽视,他的执政时间仅次于斯大林。这在很大程度上与它的绰号“停滞”有关,据称它反映了这个时代的政治、经济和创造力问题。然而,近年来,苏联历史学家越来越多地对这些概念提出质疑。苏联70年代真的停滞不前吗?Thaw充满活力的文化生活消失了吗?我们是如何从泰国过渡到戈尔巴乔夫的改革的?仔细观察,停滞期并不是特别停滞——事实上,正如克里斯汀·埃文斯、古尔纳兹·沙拉夫季诺娃、内林加·克伦比特和朱莉安·福斯特等学者所说,这是一个伟大的实验和创新时期。音乐研究在这一领域仍有一些工作要做,但彼得·施梅尔茨的优秀著作《声波过载:阿尔弗雷德·施尼特克、瓦伦丁·西尔维斯特罗夫和苏联后期的多体主义》是对苏联70年代的一次令人兴奋和开拓性的探索。通过对传记、出版材料、评论接受度和分数的仔细研究,Schmelz都重新审视了
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Peter Schmelz, Sonic Overload: Alfred Schnittke, Valentin Silvestrov, and Polystylism in the Late USSR (New York: Oxford University Press, 2021), ISBN: 978-0-19754-125-8 (hb).
What happened to the Soviet seventies? Conventional wisdom carves the Soviet Union into a series of alternatingly repressive and progressive (or, at the very least, less repressive) regimes. After Lenin’s death in 1924, the utopian underpinnings of the Bolshevik Revolution gave way to the terrors of Stalinism. Coming to power in 1956, Nikita Khrushchev denounced his predecessor’s ‘cult of personality’ and loosened restrictions on domestic and cultural life. Following a period of discontent within the Soviet Central Committee, Leonid Brezhnev spearheaded Khrushchev’s ousting and, in 1964, assumed power; he would lead the Communist Party for nearly twenty years, until his death in November 1982. In a sort of interregnum, the next two general secretaries, Yuri Andropov and Konstantin Chernenko, lasted just over a year each before dying suddenly, at which point Mikhail Gorbachev, the great progressive, came to power and opened the country to those both within and without. For historians of the Soviet Union – and, indeed, music scholars who study the region – much ink has been spilled on the eras of Lenin, Stalin, Khrushchev, and Gorbachev. Yet the tenure of Brezhnev, whose stay in power was second in length only to Stalin’s, has long been overlooked. Much of this has to do with its sobriquet, ‘Stagnation’, which allegedly spoke to the era’s political, economic, and creative malaise. In recent years, however, historians of the Soviet Union have increasingly called these notions into question. Were the Soviet seventies really stagnant? Did the vibrant cultural life of the Thaw just disappear? And how did we get from the Thaw to Gorbachev’s reforms? Upon closer inspection, the Stagnation was not particularly stagnant – and, indeed, as scholars such as Christine Evans, Gulnaz Sharafutdinova, Neringa Klumbytė, and Juliane Fürst have argued, it was a period of great experimentation and innovation. Music studies still has some catching up to do in this area, but Peter Schmelz’s excellent book Sonic Overload: Alfred Schnittke, Valentin Silvestrov, and Polystylism in the Late USSR is an exciting and pathbreaking look into the Soviet seventies. Through close study of biography, published materials, critical reception, and scores, Schmelz both revisits the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Solitary Listening, Copyright, and Reification during the Interwar Years: A Discourse Theoretic Approach Neoliberal Reason, Contemporary Music, and Proximal Critique The Panama Songs: Colonial Structures in US Popular Music between 1900 and 1920 The British (and International?) Music Society: Australian Identity and Musical Internationalism in Interwar Sydney ‘Chile – Ballad of the Cameraman’: New Song and ‘Revolutionary’ South America in Wolf Biermann's Anthems of East German Critical Solidarity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1