计算欧盟和非欧盟国家的等效收入和社会福利

IF 0.8 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Cesifo Economic Studies Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI:10.1093/CESIFO/IFX024
Ida Petrillo
{"title":"计算欧盟和非欧盟国家的等效收入和社会福利","authors":"Ida Petrillo","doi":"10.1093/CESIFO/IFX024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Individual well-being depends not only on monetary income but is affected by various non-income dimensions of human life. While this is now broadly acknowledged, a unanimous way to measure such multidimensional well-being does not exist. In this article we examine the various approaches that have been proposed in this vein in welfare economics, by highlighting their strengths and weaknesses, and devote particular attention to the equivalent income. We use this indicator to compute individual well-being and social welfare for all the European Union (EU) and some non-EU countries with the data from the 3rd wave of the European Quality of Life Survey referred to the period 2011–2012. Our analysis shows that, whether we adopt a utilitarian or rank-dependent representation of social preferences, the ranking of countries based on their equivalent incomes is substantially different from that based on monetary incomes.","PeriodicalId":51748,"journal":{"name":"Cesifo Economic Studies","volume":"64 1","pages":"396-425"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/CESIFO/IFX024","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computation of Equivalent Incomes and Social Welfare for EU and Non-EU Countries\",\"authors\":\"Ida Petrillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/CESIFO/IFX024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Individual well-being depends not only on monetary income but is affected by various non-income dimensions of human life. While this is now broadly acknowledged, a unanimous way to measure such multidimensional well-being does not exist. In this article we examine the various approaches that have been proposed in this vein in welfare economics, by highlighting their strengths and weaknesses, and devote particular attention to the equivalent income. We use this indicator to compute individual well-being and social welfare for all the European Union (EU) and some non-EU countries with the data from the 3rd wave of the European Quality of Life Survey referred to the period 2011–2012. Our analysis shows that, whether we adopt a utilitarian or rank-dependent representation of social preferences, the ranking of countries based on their equivalent incomes is substantially different from that based on monetary incomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cesifo Economic Studies\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"396-425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/CESIFO/IFX024\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cesifo Economic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/CESIFO/IFX024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cesifo Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/CESIFO/IFX024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

个人福祉不仅取决于货币收入,还受到人类生活中各种非收入层面的影响。虽然这一点现在已得到广泛认可,但衡量这种多维幸福的一致方法并不存在。在本文中,我们研究了福利经济学中以这种方式提出的各种方法,通过强调它们的优点和缺点,并特别关注等效收入。我们使用这个指标来计算所有欧盟(EU)和一些非欧盟国家的个人福利和社会福利,数据来自2011-2012年欧洲生活质量调查的第三次浪潮。我们的分析表明,无论我们采用功利主义还是依赖于排名的社会偏好表示,基于同等收入的国家排名与基于货币收入的国家排名都有本质上的不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Computation of Equivalent Incomes and Social Welfare for EU and Non-EU Countries
Individual well-being depends not only on monetary income but is affected by various non-income dimensions of human life. While this is now broadly acknowledged, a unanimous way to measure such multidimensional well-being does not exist. In this article we examine the various approaches that have been proposed in this vein in welfare economics, by highlighting their strengths and weaknesses, and devote particular attention to the equivalent income. We use this indicator to compute individual well-being and social welfare for all the European Union (EU) and some non-EU countries with the data from the 3rd wave of the European Quality of Life Survey referred to the period 2011–2012. Our analysis shows that, whether we adopt a utilitarian or rank-dependent representation of social preferences, the ranking of countries based on their equivalent incomes is substantially different from that based on monetary incomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: CESifo Economic Studies publishes provocative, high-quality papers in economics, with a particular focus on policy issues. Papers by leading academics are written for a wide and global audience, including those in government, business, and academia. The journal combines theory and empirical research in a style accessible to economists across all specialisations.
期刊最新文献
Partisan Influences in Dutch Politics Wages and Inflation in the Euro Area Uncovering the (Possible) Relationship between Central Bank Independence and Economic Growth in the Context of Monetary Unions Gender Gaps in Housework Activities in Europe before and after COVID-19 Party Politics in Austria: From Proporz to Populism?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1