{"title":"田纳西州教学教练和教师同行观察者的劳动力市场轨迹","authors":"Christopher Redding, Seth B. Hunter","doi":"10.1086/724380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study’s purpose is to provide statewide evidence on the mobility patterns of instructional coaches (ICs) and teacher peer observers (TPOs). Research Methods/Approach: Using 5 years of administrative and survey data from Tennessee, we conduct descriptive and regression analyses to document the mobility of classroom teachers, ICs, and TPOs from one year to the next. These outcomes identify if a teacher, IC, or TPO remains in the same school, moves to a new school, becomes a school administrator, or leaves teaching. In a series of ancillary investigations, we examine if mobility patterns depend on their gender and racial/ethnic identities. Findings: ICs and TPOs are no more likely to remain in teaching than full-time classroom teachers. ICs move schools at higher rates than classroom teachers, and ICs and TPOs become school administrators at much higher rates than classroom teachers. Importantly, these transitions into school administration are not equally distributed by race and gender, with ICs of color and male TPOs becoming administrators at the highest rates. Implications: Our findings imply that policy makers may be able to use ICs and TPOs to shape the principal pipeline, including strengthening the instructional expertise and increasing the racial diversity of the administrator corps.","PeriodicalId":47629,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Education","volume":"129 1","pages":"413 - 443"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Labor Market Trajectories of Tennessee Instructional Coaches and Teacher Peer Observers\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Redding, Seth B. Hunter\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/724380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This study’s purpose is to provide statewide evidence on the mobility patterns of instructional coaches (ICs) and teacher peer observers (TPOs). Research Methods/Approach: Using 5 years of administrative and survey data from Tennessee, we conduct descriptive and regression analyses to document the mobility of classroom teachers, ICs, and TPOs from one year to the next. These outcomes identify if a teacher, IC, or TPO remains in the same school, moves to a new school, becomes a school administrator, or leaves teaching. In a series of ancillary investigations, we examine if mobility patterns depend on their gender and racial/ethnic identities. Findings: ICs and TPOs are no more likely to remain in teaching than full-time classroom teachers. ICs move schools at higher rates than classroom teachers, and ICs and TPOs become school administrators at much higher rates than classroom teachers. Importantly, these transitions into school administration are not equally distributed by race and gender, with ICs of color and male TPOs becoming administrators at the highest rates. Implications: Our findings imply that policy makers may be able to use ICs and TPOs to shape the principal pipeline, including strengthening the instructional expertise and increasing the racial diversity of the administrator corps.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Education\",\"volume\":\"129 1\",\"pages\":\"413 - 443\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/724380\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724380","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Labor Market Trajectories of Tennessee Instructional Coaches and Teacher Peer Observers
Purpose: This study’s purpose is to provide statewide evidence on the mobility patterns of instructional coaches (ICs) and teacher peer observers (TPOs). Research Methods/Approach: Using 5 years of administrative and survey data from Tennessee, we conduct descriptive and regression analyses to document the mobility of classroom teachers, ICs, and TPOs from one year to the next. These outcomes identify if a teacher, IC, or TPO remains in the same school, moves to a new school, becomes a school administrator, or leaves teaching. In a series of ancillary investigations, we examine if mobility patterns depend on their gender and racial/ethnic identities. Findings: ICs and TPOs are no more likely to remain in teaching than full-time classroom teachers. ICs move schools at higher rates than classroom teachers, and ICs and TPOs become school administrators at much higher rates than classroom teachers. Importantly, these transitions into school administration are not equally distributed by race and gender, with ICs of color and male TPOs becoming administrators at the highest rates. Implications: Our findings imply that policy makers may be able to use ICs and TPOs to shape the principal pipeline, including strengthening the instructional expertise and increasing the racial diversity of the administrator corps.
期刊介绍:
Founded as School Review in 1893, the American Journal of Education acquired its present name in November 1979. The Journal seeks to bridge and integrate the intellectual, methodological, and substantive diversity of educational scholarship, and to encourage a vigorous dialogue between educational scholars and practitioners. To achieve that goal, papers are published that present research, theoretical statements, philosophical arguments, critical syntheses of a field of educational inquiry, and integrations of educational scholarship, policy, and practice.