比较印度和DACH国家制造企业和物流服务供应商的外包前景

Dhanavanth Reddy Maditati, S. Kummer, Z. H. Munim, H. Schramm
{"title":"比较印度和DACH国家制造企业和物流服务供应商的外包前景","authors":"Dhanavanth Reddy Maditati, S. Kummer, Z. H. Munim, H. Schramm","doi":"10.1108/jgoss-01-2021-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nAccording to the logistics performance index, emerging countries such as India are lagging behind developed countries such as Germany, Austria and Switzerland (DACH region). The purpose of this study is to compare and understand the differences in logistics outsourcing outlook in the two regions by considering both manufacturing firms (M-firms) and logistics service providers’ (LSPs) perspectives.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA survey targeting both LSPs and M-firms in DACH and India is conducted. A total of 96 responses were analyzed by using the chi-square test to investigate the differences and alignments in outsourcing motivation, relationship and governance between firms within and across regions.\n\n\nFindings\nM-firms in India bear strategic motivations behind outsourcing and those in DACH incline towards costs. LSPs in both regions align with the motivations of M-firms. M-firms in India rely more on LSPs by transferring the ownership of outsourced tasks, as compared to DACH. Both M-firms and LSPs in DACH claim a high level of ownership. However, firms in DACH and India do not differ significantly in terms of outsourcing engagements they seek.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe findings may only be generalized to large firms in India and DACH.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe findings of this study help managers enhance their understanding of the differences between M-firms and LSPs, and also across countries. LSPs in DACH, if they wish to operate successfully in India, will have to adapt to the M-firms strategic motivations and offer higher dependency.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study is novel, as it investigates differences between India and DACH countries while also including both manufacturers’ and logistics service providers’ perspectives.\n","PeriodicalId":43346,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing outsourcing-outlook of manufacturing firms and logistics service providers in India and DACH countries\",\"authors\":\"Dhanavanth Reddy Maditati, S. Kummer, Z. H. Munim, H. Schramm\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jgoss-01-2021-0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nAccording to the logistics performance index, emerging countries such as India are lagging behind developed countries such as Germany, Austria and Switzerland (DACH region). The purpose of this study is to compare and understand the differences in logistics outsourcing outlook in the two regions by considering both manufacturing firms (M-firms) and logistics service providers’ (LSPs) perspectives.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nA survey targeting both LSPs and M-firms in DACH and India is conducted. A total of 96 responses were analyzed by using the chi-square test to investigate the differences and alignments in outsourcing motivation, relationship and governance between firms within and across regions.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nM-firms in India bear strategic motivations behind outsourcing and those in DACH incline towards costs. LSPs in both regions align with the motivations of M-firms. M-firms in India rely more on LSPs by transferring the ownership of outsourced tasks, as compared to DACH. Both M-firms and LSPs in DACH claim a high level of ownership. However, firms in DACH and India do not differ significantly in terms of outsourcing engagements they seek.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe findings may only be generalized to large firms in India and DACH.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe findings of this study help managers enhance their understanding of the differences between M-firms and LSPs, and also across countries. LSPs in DACH, if they wish to operate successfully in India, will have to adapt to the M-firms strategic motivations and offer higher dependency.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study is novel, as it investigates differences between India and DACH countries while also including both manufacturers’ and logistics service providers’ perspectives.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jgoss-01-2021-0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jgoss-01-2021-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

根据物流绩效指数,印度等新兴国家落后于德国、奥地利和瑞士等发达国家(DACH地区)。本研究的目的是通过考虑制造企业(m -企业)和物流服务提供商(lsp)的观点,比较和理解两个地区物流外包前景的差异。设计/方法/方法对DACH和印度的lsp和m公司进行了调查。采用卡方检验对96份问卷进行分析,探讨了区域内和跨区域企业外包动机、外包关系和外包治理的差异和一致性。研究发现,印度的中小企业外包背后有战略动机,而DACH的中小企业则倾向于成本。这两个地区的lp与m型公司的动机一致。与DACH相比,印度的移动公司通过转移外包任务的所有权,更多地依赖于lsp。在DACH中,m公司和lsp都声称拥有很高的所有权。然而,DACH和印度的公司在寻求外包业务方面没有显着差异。研究的局限性/意义研究结果可能只适用于印度和DACH的大型公司。实际意义本研究的发现有助于管理者加强对流动企业和lp之间以及不同国家之间差异的理解。DACH的lsp如果希望在印度成功运营,就必须适应m公司的战略动机,并提供更高的依赖性。原创性/价值这项研究是新颖的,因为它调查了印度和DACH国家之间的差异,同时也包括制造商和物流服务提供商的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing outsourcing-outlook of manufacturing firms and logistics service providers in India and DACH countries
Purpose According to the logistics performance index, emerging countries such as India are lagging behind developed countries such as Germany, Austria and Switzerland (DACH region). The purpose of this study is to compare and understand the differences in logistics outsourcing outlook in the two regions by considering both manufacturing firms (M-firms) and logistics service providers’ (LSPs) perspectives. Design/methodology/approach A survey targeting both LSPs and M-firms in DACH and India is conducted. A total of 96 responses were analyzed by using the chi-square test to investigate the differences and alignments in outsourcing motivation, relationship and governance between firms within and across regions. Findings M-firms in India bear strategic motivations behind outsourcing and those in DACH incline towards costs. LSPs in both regions align with the motivations of M-firms. M-firms in India rely more on LSPs by transferring the ownership of outsourced tasks, as compared to DACH. Both M-firms and LSPs in DACH claim a high level of ownership. However, firms in DACH and India do not differ significantly in terms of outsourcing engagements they seek. Research limitations/implications The findings may only be generalized to large firms in India and DACH. Practical implications The findings of this study help managers enhance their understanding of the differences between M-firms and LSPs, and also across countries. LSPs in DACH, if they wish to operate successfully in India, will have to adapt to the M-firms strategic motivations and offer higher dependency. Originality/value This study is novel, as it investigates differences between India and DACH countries while also including both manufacturers’ and logistics service providers’ perspectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing aims to foster and lead the international debate on global operations and strategic sourcing. It provides a central, authoritative and independent forum for the critical evaluation and dissemination of research and development, applications, processes and current practices relating to sourcing strategically for products, services, competences and resources on a global scale and to designing, implementing and managing the resulting global operations. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing places a strong emphasis on applied research with relevant implications for both knowledge and practice. Also, the journal aims to facilitate the exchange of ideas and opinions on research projects and issues. As such, on top of a standard section publishing scientific articles, there will be two additional sections: "The Industry ViewPoint": in this section, industrial practitioners from around the world will be invited (max 2 contributions per issue) to present their point of view on a relevant subject area. This is intended to give the journal not just an academic focus, but a practical focus as well. In this way, we intend to reflect a trend that has characterised the past few decades, where interests and initiatives in research, academia and industry have been more and more converging to the point of collaborative relationships being a common practice. "Research Updates - Executive Summaries". In this section, researchers around the world will be given the opportunity to present their research projects in the area of global sourcing and outsourcing by means of an executive summary of their project. This will increase awareness of the on-going research projects in the area and it will attract interest from industry.
期刊最新文献
Observation of post-yield supply chain impediments for spoilage mitigation and revenue generation opportunities at countryside Digital procurement towards new performance frontiers: a systematic literature review and future research fronts A conceptual framework for a new service model: digital servitization with an Industrial 4.0 perspective A multinomial modeling approach to assess supplier delivery performance for buyer-supplier alignment Artificial intelligence-based supply chain resilience for improving firm performance in emerging markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1