在试验中实施研究的挑战和解决方案:PROMETHEUS方案的经验

C. Arundel, Laura Clark, Elizabeth Coleman, Laura Doherty, Adwoa Parker, D. Torgerson
{"title":"在试验中实施研究的挑战和解决方案:PROMETHEUS方案的经验","authors":"C. Arundel, Laura Clark, Elizabeth Coleman, Laura Doherty, Adwoa Parker, D. Torgerson","doi":"10.1177/26320843221106949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Effective and efficient conduct of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) ensures accurate, timely results and prevents research waste. There is however limited evidence available to inform the design, conduct and reporting of RCTs. A self-contained, randomised Study Within A Trial (SWAT), embedded within a host RCT or cohort study, offers an opportunity to fill this evidence gap. While SWATs are generally easy to implement, a range of challenges to undertaking SWATs have also been identified, however there is limited detail regarding practical solutions to tackle these. Methods Information and observations collected from PROMETHEUS members and participating trials, focusing on SWATs across a wide range of questions and settings, was reviewed to identify the challenges and solutions of delivery of a programme of SWATs. Results A range of challenges to undertaking SWATs (e.g., obtaining governance approvals) were identified along with potential solutions to these, which were implemented accordingly during programme delivery. Central to the solutions to resolve SWAT challenges is education to develop knowledge and understanding in the wider research community on the importance, purpose, and key methodological principles in relation to SWATs. In addition, the sharing of experience, best practice or resources to prevent or help negotiate the barriers to undertaking SWAT evaluation is also recommended. Conclusions Potential solutions to the barriers experienced in the design, conduct and implementation of a programme of SWATs have been identified. As more SWATs are completed, this will further develop evidence to support the mitigation or removal of barriers and in doing so this should increase the efficiency of randomised controlled trials.","PeriodicalId":74683,"journal":{"name":"Research methods in medicine & health sciences","volume":"4 1","pages":"16 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges and solutions to the implementation of studies within a trial: The experiences of the PROMETHEUS programme\",\"authors\":\"C. Arundel, Laura Clark, Elizabeth Coleman, Laura Doherty, Adwoa Parker, D. Torgerson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26320843221106949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Effective and efficient conduct of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) ensures accurate, timely results and prevents research waste. There is however limited evidence available to inform the design, conduct and reporting of RCTs. A self-contained, randomised Study Within A Trial (SWAT), embedded within a host RCT or cohort study, offers an opportunity to fill this evidence gap. While SWATs are generally easy to implement, a range of challenges to undertaking SWATs have also been identified, however there is limited detail regarding practical solutions to tackle these. Methods Information and observations collected from PROMETHEUS members and participating trials, focusing on SWATs across a wide range of questions and settings, was reviewed to identify the challenges and solutions of delivery of a programme of SWATs. Results A range of challenges to undertaking SWATs (e.g., obtaining governance approvals) were identified along with potential solutions to these, which were implemented accordingly during programme delivery. Central to the solutions to resolve SWAT challenges is education to develop knowledge and understanding in the wider research community on the importance, purpose, and key methodological principles in relation to SWATs. In addition, the sharing of experience, best practice or resources to prevent or help negotiate the barriers to undertaking SWAT evaluation is also recommended. Conclusions Potential solutions to the barriers experienced in the design, conduct and implementation of a programme of SWATs have been identified. As more SWATs are completed, this will further develop evidence to support the mitigation or removal of barriers and in doing so this should increase the efficiency of randomised controlled trials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research methods in medicine & health sciences\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"16 - 23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research methods in medicine & health sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26320843221106949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research methods in medicine & health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26320843221106949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

有效和高效的随机对照试验(RCTs)可确保准确、及时的结果,并防止研究浪费。然而,可用于随机对照试验的设计、实施和报告的证据有限。在宿主随机对照试验或队列研究中嵌入一项独立的随机试验研究(SWAT),为填补这一证据空白提供了机会。虽然swat通常很容易实施,但开展swat的一系列挑战也已被确定,但关于解决这些问题的实际解决方案的细节有限。方法回顾从PROMETHEUS成员和参与试验中收集的信息和观察结果,重点关注swat在广泛问题和环境中的应用,以确定swat计划实施的挑战和解决方案。结果确定了开展swat的一系列挑战(例如,获得治理批准)以及这些挑战的潜在解决方案,并在项目交付期间相应地实施。解决SWAT挑战的解决方案的核心是教育,以在更广泛的研究界中发展有关SWAT的重要性、目的和关键方法原则的知识和理解。此外,还建议分享经验、最佳实践或资源,以防止或帮助解决进行SWAT评估的障碍。已经确定了在swat方案的设计、实施和实施中遇到的障碍的潜在解决方案。随着更多swat的完成,这将进一步发展证据来支持减轻或消除障碍,这样做应该会提高随机对照试验的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Challenges and solutions to the implementation of studies within a trial: The experiences of the PROMETHEUS programme
Background Effective and efficient conduct of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) ensures accurate, timely results and prevents research waste. There is however limited evidence available to inform the design, conduct and reporting of RCTs. A self-contained, randomised Study Within A Trial (SWAT), embedded within a host RCT or cohort study, offers an opportunity to fill this evidence gap. While SWATs are generally easy to implement, a range of challenges to undertaking SWATs have also been identified, however there is limited detail regarding practical solutions to tackle these. Methods Information and observations collected from PROMETHEUS members and participating trials, focusing on SWATs across a wide range of questions and settings, was reviewed to identify the challenges and solutions of delivery of a programme of SWATs. Results A range of challenges to undertaking SWATs (e.g., obtaining governance approvals) were identified along with potential solutions to these, which were implemented accordingly during programme delivery. Central to the solutions to resolve SWAT challenges is education to develop knowledge and understanding in the wider research community on the importance, purpose, and key methodological principles in relation to SWATs. In addition, the sharing of experience, best practice or resources to prevent or help negotiate the barriers to undertaking SWAT evaluation is also recommended. Conclusions Potential solutions to the barriers experienced in the design, conduct and implementation of a programme of SWATs have been identified. As more SWATs are completed, this will further develop evidence to support the mitigation or removal of barriers and in doing so this should increase the efficiency of randomised controlled trials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Choice of Link Functions for Generalized Linear Mixed Models in Meta-Analyses of Proportions. Disclosure of suicidal ideation in non-psychiatric clinical research: Experience using a novel suicide risk management algorithm in a multi-center smoking cessation trial Dynamic relationship among immediate release fentanyl use and cancer incidence: A multivariate time-series analysis using vector autoregressive models Monitoring metrics over time: Why clinical trialists need to systematically collect site performance metrics. Editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1