拯救婴儿的十分钟:新生儿生命最初几分钟的评估及其与结果的关系

J. X. Sotiropoulos, V. Kapadia, S. Ramachandran, J. Oei
{"title":"拯救婴儿的十分钟:新生儿生命最初几分钟的评估及其与结果的关系","authors":"J. X. Sotiropoulos, V. Kapadia, S. Ramachandran, J. Oei","doi":"10.21037/pm-21-84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: The first 10 minutes of life is the most important for a newborn infant. For the 1% of infants that require extensive resuscitation measures, rapid evaluation of vital signs, including oxygen saturation and heart rate is vital. How a clinician achieves prompt and accurate assessment of the sick newborn infant within a few minutes remains one of the most important knowledge and practice gaps in modern newborn medicine. Over the last two decades, international newborn resuscitation practice has changed considerably. The most profound development is the focus on oxygenation within the first 10 minutes of life, with a global secular shift to using “lower oxygen strategies”. However, there is now emerging information of adverse consequences from low oxygenation during the first 5 minutes of life, especially in very preterm infants (<29 weeks’ gestation) who are already at highest risk of death. We aim to review delivery room practice aimed to provide best and most accurate assessment of the cardiorespiratory status of sick newborn infants. Methods: We performed a broad search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Google Scholar and scrutinized the reference lists of relevant English articles published before November 4th 2021, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, retrospective studies and previous narrative reviews. Key Content and Findings: This review outlines the clinical and biometric methods of assessing the newborn in the delivery room. We explore the strengths and weakness of each modality, and highlight that the resuscitation team must synthesize clinical and biometric information to guide their care. Conclusions: Clinicians must balance information gained from technology (e.g., pulse oximetry) with clinical judgement of the infant’s progress. Significantly more knowledge is needed to inform on the best assessment methods to guide resuscitation of the sick newborn infant. Failure to do so will prevent advances in research and stagnate efforts to improve outcomes for all sick newborn infants around the world. methods of assessing the infant’s response to resuscitation?","PeriodicalId":74411,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric medicine (Hong Kong, China)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ten minutes to save a baby: a narrative review of newborn assessment during first minutes of life and relationship to outcomes\",\"authors\":\"J. X. Sotiropoulos, V. Kapadia, S. Ramachandran, J. Oei\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/pm-21-84\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Objectives: The first 10 minutes of life is the most important for a newborn infant. For the 1% of infants that require extensive resuscitation measures, rapid evaluation of vital signs, including oxygen saturation and heart rate is vital. How a clinician achieves prompt and accurate assessment of the sick newborn infant within a few minutes remains one of the most important knowledge and practice gaps in modern newborn medicine. Over the last two decades, international newborn resuscitation practice has changed considerably. The most profound development is the focus on oxygenation within the first 10 minutes of life, with a global secular shift to using “lower oxygen strategies”. However, there is now emerging information of adverse consequences from low oxygenation during the first 5 minutes of life, especially in very preterm infants (<29 weeks’ gestation) who are already at highest risk of death. We aim to review delivery room practice aimed to provide best and most accurate assessment of the cardiorespiratory status of sick newborn infants. Methods: We performed a broad search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Google Scholar and scrutinized the reference lists of relevant English articles published before November 4th 2021, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, retrospective studies and previous narrative reviews. Key Content and Findings: This review outlines the clinical and biometric methods of assessing the newborn in the delivery room. We explore the strengths and weakness of each modality, and highlight that the resuscitation team must synthesize clinical and biometric information to guide their care. Conclusions: Clinicians must balance information gained from technology (e.g., pulse oximetry) with clinical judgement of the infant’s progress. Significantly more knowledge is needed to inform on the best assessment methods to guide resuscitation of the sick newborn infant. Failure to do so will prevent advances in research and stagnate efforts to improve outcomes for all sick newborn infants around the world. methods of assessing the infant’s response to resuscitation?\",\"PeriodicalId\":74411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric medicine (Hong Kong, China)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric medicine (Hong Kong, China)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/pm-21-84\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric medicine (Hong Kong, China)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/pm-21-84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:对于新生儿来说,生命的前10分钟是最重要的。对于需要广泛复苏措施的1%婴儿来说,快速评估包括血氧饱和度和心率在内的生命体征至关重要。临床医生如何在几分钟内对患病新生儿进行及时准确的评估,仍然是现代新生儿医学中最重要的知识和实践空白之一。在过去的二十年里,国际新生儿复苏实践发生了很大变化。最深刻的发展是关注生命前10分钟内的氧合,全球长期转向使用“低氧策略”。然而,现在有新的信息表明,在生命的前5分钟内,低氧合会产生不良后果,尤其是在已经处于最高死亡风险的极早产儿(妊娠<29周)中。我们的目的是回顾产房实践,旨在对患病新生儿的心肺状态进行最佳、最准确的评估。方法:我们对PubMed、MEDLINE、Google Scholar进行了广泛搜索,并仔细查看了2021年11月4日之前发表的相关英文文章的参考文献列表,包括系统综述、荟萃分析、随机对照试验、回顾性研究和以前的叙述性综述。关键内容和发现:这篇综述概述了在产房评估新生儿的临床和生物特征方法。我们探讨了每种模式的优势和劣势,并强调复苏团队必须综合临床和生物特征信息来指导他们的护理。结论:临床医生必须平衡从技术(如脉搏血氧仪)中获得的信息和对婴儿进展的临床判断。需要更多的知识来了解指导新生儿复苏的最佳评估方法。如果不这样做,将阻碍研究的进展,并阻碍改善世界各地所有患病新生儿结果的努力。评估婴儿对复苏反应的方法?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ten minutes to save a baby: a narrative review of newborn assessment during first minutes of life and relationship to outcomes
Background and Objectives: The first 10 minutes of life is the most important for a newborn infant. For the 1% of infants that require extensive resuscitation measures, rapid evaluation of vital signs, including oxygen saturation and heart rate is vital. How a clinician achieves prompt and accurate assessment of the sick newborn infant within a few minutes remains one of the most important knowledge and practice gaps in modern newborn medicine. Over the last two decades, international newborn resuscitation practice has changed considerably. The most profound development is the focus on oxygenation within the first 10 minutes of life, with a global secular shift to using “lower oxygen strategies”. However, there is now emerging information of adverse consequences from low oxygenation during the first 5 minutes of life, especially in very preterm infants (<29 weeks’ gestation) who are already at highest risk of death. We aim to review delivery room practice aimed to provide best and most accurate assessment of the cardiorespiratory status of sick newborn infants. Methods: We performed a broad search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Google Scholar and scrutinized the reference lists of relevant English articles published before November 4th 2021, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, retrospective studies and previous narrative reviews. Key Content and Findings: This review outlines the clinical and biometric methods of assessing the newborn in the delivery room. We explore the strengths and weakness of each modality, and highlight that the resuscitation team must synthesize clinical and biometric information to guide their care. Conclusions: Clinicians must balance information gained from technology (e.g., pulse oximetry) with clinical judgement of the infant’s progress. Significantly more knowledge is needed to inform on the best assessment methods to guide resuscitation of the sick newborn infant. Failure to do so will prevent advances in research and stagnate efforts to improve outcomes for all sick newborn infants around the world. methods of assessing the infant’s response to resuscitation?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spectral features of non-nutritive suck dynamics in extremely preterm infants. Influence of orthokeratology lens treatment zone decentration on myopia progression: a systematic review with meta-analysis Primary cilia in the development of the cerebral cortex: a literature review Optimal oxygen use in neonatal advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation-a literature review. Effects of maternal folic acid supplementation on renal urinary system development in human offspring—a meta-analysis and systemic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1