{"title":"印尼悬赏圣训解读(Ahmad Hassan和Siradjudin Abbas方法比较研究)","authors":"Rozian Karnedi, Dudung Abdurahman, M. Suryadilaga","doi":"10.24014/jush.v27i2.6026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explored the differences between Ahmad Hassan and Siradjuddin Abbas understanding on reward prize hadith, the methods used and the factors influencing differences. As a cadre of the two competing groups, these two scholars formulated an understanding of the reward of hadith to legitimize the understanding of each group.The results of the study found that Ahmad Hassan viewed that reward prize hadith contrary to a l- Q ur ’ an and reject ed all methods of resolution. So this hadith was a d a’if quality and Mardud status . Besides , Siradjuddin Abbas looked at the reward prize hadith was ṣaḥiḥ quality and maqbūl status using a correlative approach. Understanding rewards prize hadith by Ahmad Hassan and Siradjuddin Abbas disputed of religious understanding between the Young People and the Old People and influenced the socio-cultural context of the mid-XX century","PeriodicalId":17770,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ushuluddin","volume":"27 1","pages":"174-190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding of Reward Prize Hadiths In Indonesia (Comparative Study of the Ahmad Hassan and Siradjuddin Abbas Methods)\",\"authors\":\"Rozian Karnedi, Dudung Abdurahman, M. Suryadilaga\",\"doi\":\"10.24014/jush.v27i2.6026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explored the differences between Ahmad Hassan and Siradjuddin Abbas understanding on reward prize hadith, the methods used and the factors influencing differences. As a cadre of the two competing groups, these two scholars formulated an understanding of the reward of hadith to legitimize the understanding of each group.The results of the study found that Ahmad Hassan viewed that reward prize hadith contrary to a l- Q ur ’ an and reject ed all methods of resolution. So this hadith was a d a’if quality and Mardud status . Besides , Siradjuddin Abbas looked at the reward prize hadith was ṣaḥiḥ quality and maqbūl status using a correlative approach. Understanding rewards prize hadith by Ahmad Hassan and Siradjuddin Abbas disputed of religious understanding between the Young People and the Old People and influenced the socio-cultural context of the mid-XX century\",\"PeriodicalId\":17770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Ushuluddin\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"174-190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Ushuluddin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v27i2.6026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ushuluddin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v27i2.6026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本文探讨了Ahmad Hassan和Siradjuddin Abbas对奖惩圣训的不同理解、使用的方法和影响差异的因素。作为两个相互竞争的群体的骨干,这两位学者制定了对圣训奖励的理解,使每个群体的理解合法化。研究结果发现,艾哈迈德·哈桑认为奖赏与圣训相悖,并拒绝一切解决办法。所以这段圣训具有d ' a 'if的品质和Mardud的地位。此外,Siradjuddin Abbas使用相关方法研究了奖惩圣训是ṣaḥiḥ质量和maqbūl状态。Ahmad Hassan和Siradjuddin Abbas的圣训《理解》对年轻人和老年人之间的宗教理解产生了争议,并影响了20世纪中叶的社会文化背景
Understanding of Reward Prize Hadiths In Indonesia (Comparative Study of the Ahmad Hassan and Siradjuddin Abbas Methods)
This article explored the differences between Ahmad Hassan and Siradjuddin Abbas understanding on reward prize hadith, the methods used and the factors influencing differences. As a cadre of the two competing groups, these two scholars formulated an understanding of the reward of hadith to legitimize the understanding of each group.The results of the study found that Ahmad Hassan viewed that reward prize hadith contrary to a l- Q ur ’ an and reject ed all methods of resolution. So this hadith was a d a’if quality and Mardud status . Besides , Siradjuddin Abbas looked at the reward prize hadith was ṣaḥiḥ quality and maqbūl status using a correlative approach. Understanding rewards prize hadith by Ahmad Hassan and Siradjuddin Abbas disputed of religious understanding between the Young People and the Old People and influenced the socio-cultural context of the mid-XX century