印尼悬赏圣训解读(Ahmad Hassan和Siradjudin Abbas方法比较研究)

Rozian Karnedi, Dudung Abdurahman, M. Suryadilaga
{"title":"印尼悬赏圣训解读(Ahmad Hassan和Siradjudin Abbas方法比较研究)","authors":"Rozian Karnedi, Dudung Abdurahman, M. Suryadilaga","doi":"10.24014/jush.v27i2.6026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explored the differences between Ahmad Hassan and Siradjuddin Abbas understanding on reward prize hadith, the methods used and the factors influencing differences. As a cadre of the two competing groups, these two scholars formulated an understanding of the reward of hadith to legitimize the understanding of each group.The results of the study found that Ahmad Hassan viewed that reward prize hadith contrary to a l- Q ur ’ an and reject ed all methods of resolution. So this hadith was a d a’if quality and Mardud status . Besides , Siradjuddin Abbas looked at the reward prize hadith was ṣaḥiḥ quality and maqbūl status using a correlative approach. Understanding rewards prize hadith by Ahmad Hassan and Siradjuddin Abbas disputed of religious understanding between the Young People and the Old People and influenced the socio-cultural context of the mid-XX century","PeriodicalId":17770,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ushuluddin","volume":"27 1","pages":"174-190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding of Reward Prize Hadiths In Indonesia (Comparative Study of the Ahmad Hassan and Siradjuddin Abbas Methods)\",\"authors\":\"Rozian Karnedi, Dudung Abdurahman, M. Suryadilaga\",\"doi\":\"10.24014/jush.v27i2.6026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explored the differences between Ahmad Hassan and Siradjuddin Abbas understanding on reward prize hadith, the methods used and the factors influencing differences. As a cadre of the two competing groups, these two scholars formulated an understanding of the reward of hadith to legitimize the understanding of each group.The results of the study found that Ahmad Hassan viewed that reward prize hadith contrary to a l- Q ur ’ an and reject ed all methods of resolution. So this hadith was a d a’if quality and Mardud status . Besides , Siradjuddin Abbas looked at the reward prize hadith was ṣaḥiḥ quality and maqbūl status using a correlative approach. Understanding rewards prize hadith by Ahmad Hassan and Siradjuddin Abbas disputed of religious understanding between the Young People and the Old People and influenced the socio-cultural context of the mid-XX century\",\"PeriodicalId\":17770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Ushuluddin\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"174-190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Ushuluddin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v27i2.6026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ushuluddin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v27i2.6026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文探讨了Ahmad Hassan和Siradjuddin Abbas对奖惩圣训的不同理解、使用的方法和影响差异的因素。作为两个相互竞争的群体的骨干,这两位学者制定了对圣训奖励的理解,使每个群体的理解合法化。研究结果发现,艾哈迈德·哈桑认为奖赏与圣训相悖,并拒绝一切解决办法。所以这段圣训具有d ' a 'if的品质和Mardud的地位。此外,Siradjuddin Abbas使用相关方法研究了奖惩圣训是ṣaḥiḥ质量和maqbūl状态。Ahmad Hassan和Siradjuddin Abbas的圣训《理解》对年轻人和老年人之间的宗教理解产生了争议,并影响了20世纪中叶的社会文化背景
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding of Reward Prize Hadiths In Indonesia (Comparative Study of the Ahmad Hassan and Siradjuddin Abbas Methods)
This article explored the differences between Ahmad Hassan and Siradjuddin Abbas understanding on reward prize hadith, the methods used and the factors influencing differences. As a cadre of the two competing groups, these two scholars formulated an understanding of the reward of hadith to legitimize the understanding of each group.The results of the study found that Ahmad Hassan viewed that reward prize hadith contrary to a l- Q ur ’ an and reject ed all methods of resolution. So this hadith was a d a’if quality and Mardud status . Besides , Siradjuddin Abbas looked at the reward prize hadith was ṣaḥiḥ quality and maqbūl status using a correlative approach. Understanding rewards prize hadith by Ahmad Hassan and Siradjuddin Abbas disputed of religious understanding between the Young People and the Old People and influenced the socio-cultural context of the mid-XX century
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
THE SPIRAL ANDROMEDA PARADIGM; An Interpretation on Science Integration of UIN Suska Riau Criticism of the Pro-LGBT’s Misinterpretation of the Quranic Verses on the Illegality of LGBT Application of Ijmālī Method In Exegesis (Sharḥ) The Hadith of The Prophet: Analysis of the Book of Hadith using the Ijmālī Method Sufis and Women: The Study of Women's Sufis in The Western World On Imam Ghazālī's Farḍ ‘Ain and Farḍ Kifāyah: An Epistemological Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1