“上帝与神性相对应”:约翰·韦伯斯特在“卡尔·巴特”之后的上帝学说

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-03-29 DOI:10.1017/S0036930622000941
Brent A. Rempel
{"title":"“上帝与神性相对应”:约翰·韦伯斯特在“卡尔·巴特”之后的上帝学说","authors":"Brent A. Rempel","doi":"10.1017/S0036930622000941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The nature and extent of Karl Barth's significance in John Webster's theological formation is widely recognised but remains to be explored in detail. Addressing this lacuna, this essay considers how Barth's doctrine of the triune God animates Webster's teaching on the same. In approaching the topic, I show how Webster carries forward Barth's deep sense of God's aseity in relation to the world and follows Barth in his commitment to the singularity of God's triune being. God's particularity and aseity converge in ‘God's self-correspondence’ (namely, that God ‘in Godself’ corresponds to God ‘for us’), which represents the core of Barth's influence on Webster's theology proper. The final section responds to Katherine Sonderegger's recent criticism of Webster's ‘relationalism’, which counts God's relation to creatures as an integral aspect of God's eternal life. I reframe the issue in terms of Webster's late-career retractions of the language of inclusion and divine self-determination, arguing that the difficulties that Sonderegger identifies in earlier writings are overcome in the final decade of Webster's corpus.","PeriodicalId":44026,"journal":{"name":"SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY","volume":"76 1","pages":"164 - 177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘God corresponds to Godself’: John Webster's doctrine of God ‘after’ Karl Barth\",\"authors\":\"Brent A. Rempel\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0036930622000941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The nature and extent of Karl Barth's significance in John Webster's theological formation is widely recognised but remains to be explored in detail. Addressing this lacuna, this essay considers how Barth's doctrine of the triune God animates Webster's teaching on the same. In approaching the topic, I show how Webster carries forward Barth's deep sense of God's aseity in relation to the world and follows Barth in his commitment to the singularity of God's triune being. God's particularity and aseity converge in ‘God's self-correspondence’ (namely, that God ‘in Godself’ corresponds to God ‘for us’), which represents the core of Barth's influence on Webster's theology proper. The final section responds to Katherine Sonderegger's recent criticism of Webster's ‘relationalism’, which counts God's relation to creatures as an integral aspect of God's eternal life. I reframe the issue in terms of Webster's late-career retractions of the language of inclusion and divine self-determination, arguing that the difficulties that Sonderegger identifies in earlier writings are overcome in the final decade of Webster's corpus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"164 - 177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0036930622000941\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0036930622000941","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要卡尔·巴特在约翰·韦伯斯特神学形成中的意义的性质和程度得到了广泛认可,但仍有待于详细探讨。针对这一缺陷,本文探讨了巴特的三位一体上帝学说是如何激励韦伯斯特的教义的。在探讨这个话题的过程中,我展示了韦伯斯特如何发扬巴特对上帝与世界关系的深刻感觉,并追随巴特对上帝三位一体的独特性的承诺。上帝的特殊性和本质性集中于“上帝的自我对应”(即上帝“在自我中”对应于“为我们”的上帝),这代表了巴特对韦伯斯特神学本体影响的核心。最后一节回应了凯瑟琳·桑德格最近对韦伯斯特“关系论”的批评,韦伯斯特认为上帝与生物的关系是上帝永恒生命的一个组成部分。我根据韦伯斯特职业生涯后期对包容和神圣自决语言的收回重新定义了这个问题,认为桑德格在早期著作中发现的困难在韦伯斯特语料库的最后十年得到了克服。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘God corresponds to Godself’: John Webster's doctrine of God ‘after’ Karl Barth
Abstract The nature and extent of Karl Barth's significance in John Webster's theological formation is widely recognised but remains to be explored in detail. Addressing this lacuna, this essay considers how Barth's doctrine of the triune God animates Webster's teaching on the same. In approaching the topic, I show how Webster carries forward Barth's deep sense of God's aseity in relation to the world and follows Barth in his commitment to the singularity of God's triune being. God's particularity and aseity converge in ‘God's self-correspondence’ (namely, that God ‘in Godself’ corresponds to God ‘for us’), which represents the core of Barth's influence on Webster's theology proper. The final section responds to Katherine Sonderegger's recent criticism of Webster's ‘relationalism’, which counts God's relation to creatures as an integral aspect of God's eternal life. I reframe the issue in terms of Webster's late-career retractions of the language of inclusion and divine self-determination, arguing that the difficulties that Sonderegger identifies in earlier writings are overcome in the final decade of Webster's corpus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
期刊最新文献
Eschatological naturalism and ecological responsibility: Troubling some assumptions Apocalyptic praxis in Evagrius of Pontus and Francis of Assisi Beyond text to God: Bonaventure's transformation of exegetical method from his Breviloquium to Itinerarium mentis in Deum (1257–1259) ‘The visible renewal of human life’: Barth's ethical assessment of the Reformed confessions The beauty of the body and the ascension: A reclamation and subversion of physical beauty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1