高等教育机构排名

IF 0.6 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology Pub Date : 2021-02-11 DOI:10.14429/DJLIT.41.1.16757
A. K. Nassa, Jagdish Arora
{"title":"高等教育机构排名","authors":"A. K. Nassa, Jagdish Arora","doi":"10.14429/DJLIT.41.1.16757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ranking of higher education institutions (HEI) is a convenient and easily understandable method of evaluation and assessment. An ordinal number assigned to an HEI by a ranking system represents its comparative position in a list of ranked institutions based on marks obtained by it on various performance parameters or indicators. Ranking of HEIs have been lauded and criticised simultaneously. University rankings are often criticised for methodology used, choice of indicators and weightage assigned to them, focus on science, technology and English language publications, assessment of institutions as whole (instead of individual program) and the practice of assigning an ordinal number or a rank to represent quality of an HEI. At the same time, university rankings are lauded for serving as information tools for students, researchers, funding agencies, policy makers and other stakeholders as well as for instilling a competitive spirit amongst institutions to perform better in ranking systems. However, most experts agree that rankings are here to stay in the education market place. As such, although ranking system cannot measure quality of education and research in absolute term, it does serve as indicator to various aspects of quality in higher education, which, in turn, can be used by institutions themselves for improving their performance on these parameters. While universities are welcomed to use rankings for improving their performance, ranking systems should not dictate university policy, either at a national or institutional level, but should be used as a source of information for guiding policies that should be decided according to the needs of the university’s own community, traditions, market niche, national role and so on1.","PeriodicalId":44921,"journal":{"name":"DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology","volume":"41 1","pages":"3-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ranking of Institutions of Higher Education\",\"authors\":\"A. K. Nassa, Jagdish Arora\",\"doi\":\"10.14429/DJLIT.41.1.16757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ranking of higher education institutions (HEI) is a convenient and easily understandable method of evaluation and assessment. An ordinal number assigned to an HEI by a ranking system represents its comparative position in a list of ranked institutions based on marks obtained by it on various performance parameters or indicators. Ranking of HEIs have been lauded and criticised simultaneously. University rankings are often criticised for methodology used, choice of indicators and weightage assigned to them, focus on science, technology and English language publications, assessment of institutions as whole (instead of individual program) and the practice of assigning an ordinal number or a rank to represent quality of an HEI. At the same time, university rankings are lauded for serving as information tools for students, researchers, funding agencies, policy makers and other stakeholders as well as for instilling a competitive spirit amongst institutions to perform better in ranking systems. However, most experts agree that rankings are here to stay in the education market place. As such, although ranking system cannot measure quality of education and research in absolute term, it does serve as indicator to various aspects of quality in higher education, which, in turn, can be used by institutions themselves for improving their performance on these parameters. While universities are welcomed to use rankings for improving their performance, ranking systems should not dictate university policy, either at a national or institutional level, but should be used as a source of information for guiding policies that should be decided according to the needs of the university’s own community, traditions, market niche, national role and so on1.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"3-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14429/DJLIT.41.1.16757\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14429/DJLIT.41.1.16757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

高等教育机构排名是一种方便易懂的评价和评估方法。由排名系统分配给高等教育机构的序数代表其在排名机构名单中的比较位置,该名单是根据其在各种绩效参数或指标上获得的分数而定的。高等教育机构的排名受到了赞扬和批评。大学排名经常因为使用的方法、指标的选择和分配给它们的权重、关注科学、技术和英语出版物、评估机构整体(而不是个别项目)以及分配序数或排名来代表高等教育机构质量的做法而受到批评。与此同时,大学排名被称赞为学生、研究人员、资助机构、政策制定者和其他利益相关者的信息工具,并在院校之间灌输竞争精神,以便在排名系统中表现更好。然而,大多数专家都认为,排名将继续存在于教育市场。因此,虽然排名系统不能绝对地衡量教育和研究的质量,但它确实可以作为高等教育质量的各个方面的指标,而这些指标反过来又可以被机构自己用来提高它们在这些参数上的表现。虽然我们欢迎大学利用排名来提高自己的表现,但排名系统不应该在国家或机构层面上决定大学的政策,而应该作为指导政策的信息来源,这些政策应该根据大学自己的社区、传统、市场定位、国家角色等的需要来决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ranking of Institutions of Higher Education
Ranking of higher education institutions (HEI) is a convenient and easily understandable method of evaluation and assessment. An ordinal number assigned to an HEI by a ranking system represents its comparative position in a list of ranked institutions based on marks obtained by it on various performance parameters or indicators. Ranking of HEIs have been lauded and criticised simultaneously. University rankings are often criticised for methodology used, choice of indicators and weightage assigned to them, focus on science, technology and English language publications, assessment of institutions as whole (instead of individual program) and the practice of assigning an ordinal number or a rank to represent quality of an HEI. At the same time, university rankings are lauded for serving as information tools for students, researchers, funding agencies, policy makers and other stakeholders as well as for instilling a competitive spirit amongst institutions to perform better in ranking systems. However, most experts agree that rankings are here to stay in the education market place. As such, although ranking system cannot measure quality of education and research in absolute term, it does serve as indicator to various aspects of quality in higher education, which, in turn, can be used by institutions themselves for improving their performance on these parameters. While universities are welcomed to use rankings for improving their performance, ranking systems should not dictate university policy, either at a national or institutional level, but should be used as a source of information for guiding policies that should be decided according to the needs of the university’s own community, traditions, market niche, national role and so on1.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology
DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology publishes original research and review papers related to library science and IT applied to library activities, services, and products. Major subject fields covered include: Information systems, Knowledge management, Collection building & management, Information behaviour & retrieval, Librarianship/library management, Library & information services, Records management & preservation, etc.
期刊最新文献
Literature Survey and Analysis of Digital Humanities and Libraries in Recent Years Digital Humanities and Librarianship Text Mining of Twitter data for Mapping the Digital Humanities Research Trends Libraries and Digital Humanities Blended Learning vs E learning Determining the Best Mode of Education from the Perspective of the Learners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1