阅读韵律的综合:评价措辞和句法干预

IF 1.5 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Reading & Writing Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-01-05 DOI:10.1080/10573569.2022.2147464
Aya Shhub, Zaira Jimenez, Michael Solis
{"title":"阅读韵律的综合:评价措辞和句法干预","authors":"Aya Shhub, Zaira Jimenez, Michael Solis","doi":"10.1080/10573569.2022.2147464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Research on prosody suggests it is an important consideration for both reading fluency and reading comprehension however research on how to teach prosody is limited. This systematic review expands the understanding of prosody by examining intervention studies of prosody focused on instruction to improve syntax and phrasing outcomes. A total of 18 studies between 1985 and 2020 (N = 770, Grades K-12) met inclusion criteria. Six studies were experimental and 13 were quasi experimental. Intervention instruction focused on modeling, instruction on a specific prosody component (e.g., syntax and phrasing), repeated reading, partner reading, independent reading, silent reading, choral reading, readers theater, and computer programs. Overall findings indicate interventions which include repeated reading and one or more of the following, modeled reading or immediate feedback have larger effects on prosody compared to interventions that include repeated reading and only instruction on a specific prosody component (e.g., syntax and phrasing).","PeriodicalId":51619,"journal":{"name":"Reading & Writing Quarterly","volume":"39 1","pages":"530 - 547"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Synthesis of Reading Prosody: Evaluating Phrasing and Syntax Interventions\",\"authors\":\"Aya Shhub, Zaira Jimenez, Michael Solis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10573569.2022.2147464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Research on prosody suggests it is an important consideration for both reading fluency and reading comprehension however research on how to teach prosody is limited. This systematic review expands the understanding of prosody by examining intervention studies of prosody focused on instruction to improve syntax and phrasing outcomes. A total of 18 studies between 1985 and 2020 (N = 770, Grades K-12) met inclusion criteria. Six studies were experimental and 13 were quasi experimental. Intervention instruction focused on modeling, instruction on a specific prosody component (e.g., syntax and phrasing), repeated reading, partner reading, independent reading, silent reading, choral reading, readers theater, and computer programs. Overall findings indicate interventions which include repeated reading and one or more of the following, modeled reading or immediate feedback have larger effects on prosody compared to interventions that include repeated reading and only instruction on a specific prosody component (e.g., syntax and phrasing).\",\"PeriodicalId\":51619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reading & Writing Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"530 - 547\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reading & Writing Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2022.2147464\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading & Writing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2022.2147464","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对韵律的研究表明,韵律是阅读流畅性和阅读理解的重要考虑因素,但对如何教授韵律的研究却很少。这篇系统的综述通过检查韵律的干预研究来扩展对韵律的理解,这些研究集中在提高语法和措辞结果的教学上。1985年至2020年间共有18项研究(N = 770, K-12年级)符合纳入标准。6项为实验研究,13项为准实验研究。干预教学侧重于建模、特定韵律成分(如句法和措辞)的教学、重复阅读、伙伴阅读、独立阅读、默读、合唱阅读、读者戏剧和计算机程序。总体研究结果表明,与重复阅读和只指导特定韵律成分(如语法和措辞)的干预措施相比,包括重复阅读和以下一种或多种干预措施、模型阅读或即时反馈的干预措施对韵律的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Synthesis of Reading Prosody: Evaluating Phrasing and Syntax Interventions
Abstract Research on prosody suggests it is an important consideration for both reading fluency and reading comprehension however research on how to teach prosody is limited. This systematic review expands the understanding of prosody by examining intervention studies of prosody focused on instruction to improve syntax and phrasing outcomes. A total of 18 studies between 1985 and 2020 (N = 770, Grades K-12) met inclusion criteria. Six studies were experimental and 13 were quasi experimental. Intervention instruction focused on modeling, instruction on a specific prosody component (e.g., syntax and phrasing), repeated reading, partner reading, independent reading, silent reading, choral reading, readers theater, and computer programs. Overall findings indicate interventions which include repeated reading and one or more of the following, modeled reading or immediate feedback have larger effects on prosody compared to interventions that include repeated reading and only instruction on a specific prosody component (e.g., syntax and phrasing).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Argumentative Writing for Students With Disabilities in Inclusive Science Classes: A Pilot Study Online Intervention to Prevent Summer Learning Loss For Struggling First Grade Writers Can Artificial Intelligence Identify Reading Fluency and Level? Comparison of Human and Machine Performance Exploring Relations between Teachers’ Language- and Code-Based Writing Supports to Early Literacy and Vocabulary Learning in Children with Language Vulnerabilities The Technical Adequacy of Coding Procedures for Retell Measures in Elementary School Students with Dyslexia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1