预测银行系统性风险:一种机器学习方法

IF 1.8 Q3 MANAGEMENT Journal of Modelling in Management Pub Date : 2023-07-19 DOI:10.1108/jm2-12-2022-0288
G. Kumar, Molla Ramizur Rahman, A. Rajverma, A. Misra
{"title":"预测银行系统性风险:一种机器学习方法","authors":"G. Kumar, Molla Ramizur Rahman, A. Rajverma, A. Misra","doi":"10.1108/jm2-12-2022-0288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to analyse the systemic risk emitted by all publicly listed commercial banks in a key emerging economy, India.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study makes use of the Tobias and Brunnermeier (2016) estimator to quantify the systemic risk (ΔCoVaR) that banks contribute to the system. The methodology addresses a classification problem based on the probability that a particular bank will emit high systemic risk or moderate systemic risk. The study applies machine learning models such as logistic regression, random forest (RF), neural networks and gradient boosting machine (GBM) and addresses the issue of imbalanced data sets to investigate bank’s balance sheet features and bank’s stock features which may potentially determine the factors of systemic risk emission.\n\n\nFindings\nThe study reports that across various performance matrices, the authors find that two specifications are preferred: RF and GBM. The study identifies lag of the estimator of systemic risk, stock beta, stock volatility and return on equity as important features to explain emission of systemic risk.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe findings will help banks and regulators with the key features that can be used to formulate the policy decisions.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study contributes to the existing literature by suggesting classification algorithms that can be used to model the probability of systemic risk emission in a classification problem setting. Further, the study identifies the features responsible for the likelihood of systemic risk.\n","PeriodicalId":16349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modelling in Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting systemic risk of banks: a machine learning approach\",\"authors\":\"G. Kumar, Molla Ramizur Rahman, A. Rajverma, A. Misra\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jm2-12-2022-0288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to analyse the systemic risk emitted by all publicly listed commercial banks in a key emerging economy, India.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe study makes use of the Tobias and Brunnermeier (2016) estimator to quantify the systemic risk (ΔCoVaR) that banks contribute to the system. The methodology addresses a classification problem based on the probability that a particular bank will emit high systemic risk or moderate systemic risk. The study applies machine learning models such as logistic regression, random forest (RF), neural networks and gradient boosting machine (GBM) and addresses the issue of imbalanced data sets to investigate bank’s balance sheet features and bank’s stock features which may potentially determine the factors of systemic risk emission.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe study reports that across various performance matrices, the authors find that two specifications are preferred: RF and GBM. The study identifies lag of the estimator of systemic risk, stock beta, stock volatility and return on equity as important features to explain emission of systemic risk.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe findings will help banks and regulators with the key features that can be used to formulate the policy decisions.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study contributes to the existing literature by suggesting classification algorithms that can be used to model the probability of systemic risk emission in a classification problem setting. Further, the study identifies the features responsible for the likelihood of systemic risk.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":16349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Modelling in Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Modelling in Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jm2-12-2022-0288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modelling in Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jm2-12-2022-0288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在分析主要新兴经济体印度所有公开上市商业银行所产生的系统性风险。设计/方法/方法本研究使用Tobias和Brunnermeier(2016)估计器来量化银行对系统的系统性风险(ΔCoVaR)。该方法解决了一个基于特定银行将产生高系统性风险或中度系统性风险的概率的分类问题。该研究应用逻辑回归、随机森林(RF)、神经网络和梯度增强机(GBM)等机器学习模型,并解决数据集不平衡的问题,研究可能决定系统性风险排放因素的银行资产负债表特征和银行股票特征。该研究报告称,在各种性能矩阵中,作者发现两种规格更受欢迎:RF和GBM。研究发现,系统性风险估计量的滞后、股票贝塔、股票波动率和股本回报率是解释系统性风险排放的重要特征。实际意义研究结果将有助于银行和监管机构了解可用于制定政策决策的关键特征。原创性/价值本研究通过提出可用于在分类问题设置中建模系统性风险释放概率的分类算法,对现有文献做出了贡献。此外,该研究还确定了导致系统性风险可能性的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting systemic risk of banks: a machine learning approach
Purpose This study aims to analyse the systemic risk emitted by all publicly listed commercial banks in a key emerging economy, India. Design/methodology/approach The study makes use of the Tobias and Brunnermeier (2016) estimator to quantify the systemic risk (ΔCoVaR) that banks contribute to the system. The methodology addresses a classification problem based on the probability that a particular bank will emit high systemic risk or moderate systemic risk. The study applies machine learning models such as logistic regression, random forest (RF), neural networks and gradient boosting machine (GBM) and addresses the issue of imbalanced data sets to investigate bank’s balance sheet features and bank’s stock features which may potentially determine the factors of systemic risk emission. Findings The study reports that across various performance matrices, the authors find that two specifications are preferred: RF and GBM. The study identifies lag of the estimator of systemic risk, stock beta, stock volatility and return on equity as important features to explain emission of systemic risk. Practical implications The findings will help banks and regulators with the key features that can be used to formulate the policy decisions. Originality/value This study contributes to the existing literature by suggesting classification algorithms that can be used to model the probability of systemic risk emission in a classification problem setting. Further, the study identifies the features responsible for the likelihood of systemic risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Journal of Modelling in Management (JM2) provides a forum for academics and researchers with a strong interest in business and management modelling. The journal analyses the conceptual antecedents and theoretical underpinnings leading to research modelling processes which derive useful consequences in terms of management science, business and management implementation and applications. JM2 is focused on the utilization of management data, which is amenable to research modelling processes, and welcomes academic papers that not only encompass the whole research process (from conceptualization to managerial implications) but also make explicit the individual links between ''antecedents and modelling'' (how to tackle certain problems) and ''modelling and consequences'' (how to apply the models and draw appropriate conclusions). The journal is particularly interested in innovative methodological and statistical modelling processes and those models that result in clear and justified managerial decisions. JM2 specifically promotes and supports research writing, that engages in an academically rigorous manner, in areas related to research modelling such as: A priori theorizing conceptual models, Artificial intelligence, machine learning, Association rule mining, clustering, feature selection, Business analytics: Descriptive, Predictive, and Prescriptive Analytics, Causal analytics: structural equation modeling, partial least squares modeling, Computable general equilibrium models, Computer-based models, Data mining, data analytics with big data, Decision support systems and business intelligence, Econometric models, Fuzzy logic modeling, Generalized linear models, Multi-attribute decision-making models, Non-linear models, Optimization, Simulation models, Statistical decision models, Statistical inference making and probabilistic modeling, Text mining, web mining, and visual analytics, Uncertainty-based reasoning models.
期刊最新文献
Understanding the challenges of entrepreneurship in emerging economies: a grey systems-based study with entrepreneurs in Brazil Financing options for logistics firms considering product quality loss A machine learning analysis of the value-added intellectual coefficient’s effect on firm performance A multiobjective mathematical model for a novel buy-back coordination contract in the symbiotic supply chain with fuzzy price: a data-driven decision approach Fermatean fuzzy group decision model for agile, resilient and sustainable logistics service provider selection in the manufacturing industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1