我是如何成为一棵树的苏曼娜·罗伊(书评)

IF 0.3 4区 文学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Configurations Pub Date : 2023-03-30 DOI:10.1353/con.2023.0006
X. Chacko, Sushmita Chatterjee, Laura A. Foster, Brian Sabel, Sam Smiley, Banu Subramaniam
{"title":"我是如何成为一棵树的苏曼娜·罗伊(书评)","authors":"X. Chacko, Sushmita Chatterjee, Laura A. Foster, Brian Sabel, Sam Smiley, Banu Subramaniam","doi":"10.1353/con.2023.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"for fiction” (221). The material Keiser gathers here is interesting, but the arguments about hypochondria lose focus. One of the most ambitious moments of Nervous Fictions comes in the introduction when Keiser sees his nervous fictions as foundational in Cartesian dualism. His argument is subtle and, to my mind, deserves more attention in the book: Keiser contends that Descartes massages the difference between the pineal gland—an identifiable organ—and the mind through analogy. The pineal gland is the theater for the soul, but shares with the mind the quality of singularity. They are like each other, and through this quick-footed move, Descartes opens up the possibility of the mind itself as an internal theater—a metaphor that captures the imagination of countless writers and thinkers following him. With the publication of Nervous Fiction, Kesier joins and advances an important conversation of established scholars navigating what science could and could not do and also what it meant and how it meant. Nervous Fictions promises to chart new intellectual territory in how we understand the relationship between literature and science in the period—it is at once a relation of influence as well as mutual constitution.","PeriodicalId":55630,"journal":{"name":"Configurations","volume":"31 1","pages":"96 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How I Became a Tree by Sumana Roy (review)\",\"authors\":\"X. Chacko, Sushmita Chatterjee, Laura A. Foster, Brian Sabel, Sam Smiley, Banu Subramaniam\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/con.2023.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"for fiction” (221). The material Keiser gathers here is interesting, but the arguments about hypochondria lose focus. One of the most ambitious moments of Nervous Fictions comes in the introduction when Keiser sees his nervous fictions as foundational in Cartesian dualism. His argument is subtle and, to my mind, deserves more attention in the book: Keiser contends that Descartes massages the difference between the pineal gland—an identifiable organ—and the mind through analogy. The pineal gland is the theater for the soul, but shares with the mind the quality of singularity. They are like each other, and through this quick-footed move, Descartes opens up the possibility of the mind itself as an internal theater—a metaphor that captures the imagination of countless writers and thinkers following him. With the publication of Nervous Fiction, Kesier joins and advances an important conversation of established scholars navigating what science could and could not do and also what it meant and how it meant. Nervous Fictions promises to chart new intellectual territory in how we understand the relationship between literature and science in the period—it is at once a relation of influence as well as mutual constitution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Configurations\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"96 - 98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Configurations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2023.0006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Configurations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2023.0006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

小说”(221)。凯泽在这里收集的材料很有趣,但关于疑病症的争论却失去了焦点。《神经小说》最雄心勃勃的时刻之一出现在引言中,凯泽将他的神经小说视为笛卡尔二元论的基础。他的论点很微妙,在我看来,这本书值得更多关注:凯泽认为笛卡尔通过类比来处理松果体(一个可识别的器官)和大脑之间的差异。松果体是灵魂的剧场,但与心灵共享奇点的品质。他们彼此相似,通过这一快速的行动,笛卡尔打开了心灵本身作为一个内部剧场的可能性——这个隐喻抓住了无数追随他的作家和思想家的想象力。随着《神经小说》的出版,Kesier加入并推进了一场重要的对话,既有学者探讨科学能做什么,不能做什么,它意味着什么以及它的意义。紧张小说有望为我们理解这一时期文学与科学之间的关系开辟新的知识领域——这既是一种影响关系,也是一种相互构成的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How I Became a Tree by Sumana Roy (review)
for fiction” (221). The material Keiser gathers here is interesting, but the arguments about hypochondria lose focus. One of the most ambitious moments of Nervous Fictions comes in the introduction when Keiser sees his nervous fictions as foundational in Cartesian dualism. His argument is subtle and, to my mind, deserves more attention in the book: Keiser contends that Descartes massages the difference between the pineal gland—an identifiable organ—and the mind through analogy. The pineal gland is the theater for the soul, but shares with the mind the quality of singularity. They are like each other, and through this quick-footed move, Descartes opens up the possibility of the mind itself as an internal theater—a metaphor that captures the imagination of countless writers and thinkers following him. With the publication of Nervous Fiction, Kesier joins and advances an important conversation of established scholars navigating what science could and could not do and also what it meant and how it meant. Nervous Fictions promises to chart new intellectual territory in how we understand the relationship between literature and science in the period—it is at once a relation of influence as well as mutual constitution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Configurations
Configurations Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Configurations explores the relations of literature and the arts to the sciences and technology. Founded in 1993, the journal continues to set the stage for transdisciplinary research concerning the interplay between science, technology, and the arts. Configurations is the official publication of the Society for Literature, Science, and the Arts (SLSA).
期刊最新文献
Reading Storied Corals with the Scientific Poetics of Water The Global Distribution, Life History, and Taxonomic Description of the Common Oceanic Plastic Bag: Plasticus sacculi sp. nov The Immersive Enclosure: Virtual Reality in Japan by Paul Roquet (review) Contributors The End of the Anthropocene: Ecocriticism, the Universal Ecosystem, and the Astropocene by Michael J. Gormley (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1