家族企业与劳动力需求:规模很重要,但只有小企业不同

IF 0.8 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Cesifo Economic Studies Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI:10.1093/CESIFO/IFY012
Arnd Kölling
{"title":"家族企业与劳动力需求:规模很重要,但只有小企业不同","authors":"Arnd Kölling","doi":"10.1093/CESIFO/IFY012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes the differences in labor demand between family and non-family firms. The majority of firms in modern economies are still family controlled. In addition, these firms seem to exhibit better employment performance than other companies. Therefore, this study estimates a labor demand model with German establishment panel data. Moreover, a Heckman correction is introduced to the regressions to avoid selectivity. The results of random effects and fractional panel probit estimations indicate that own-wage and output elasticities are lower in absolute values, thus supporting the assumption that family firms offer higher job security and are more risk averse than other establishments. However, this result does not hold if the investigation is restricted to establishments with 20 or more employees. There is no evidence of different behavior in larger family firms.","PeriodicalId":51748,"journal":{"name":"Cesifo Economic Studies","volume":"65 1","pages":"108-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/CESIFO/IFY012","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family firms and labor demand: Size matters - but only the small ones are different\",\"authors\":\"Arnd Kölling\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/CESIFO/IFY012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyzes the differences in labor demand between family and non-family firms. The majority of firms in modern economies are still family controlled. In addition, these firms seem to exhibit better employment performance than other companies. Therefore, this study estimates a labor demand model with German establishment panel data. Moreover, a Heckman correction is introduced to the regressions to avoid selectivity. The results of random effects and fractional panel probit estimations indicate that own-wage and output elasticities are lower in absolute values, thus supporting the assumption that family firms offer higher job security and are more risk averse than other establishments. However, this result does not hold if the investigation is restricted to establishments with 20 or more employees. There is no evidence of different behavior in larger family firms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cesifo Economic Studies\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"108-129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/CESIFO/IFY012\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cesifo Economic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/CESIFO/IFY012\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cesifo Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/CESIFO/IFY012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本文分析了家族企业和非家族企业劳动力需求的差异。现代经济中的大多数公司仍然由家族控制。此外,这些公司似乎比其他公司表现出更好的就业表现。因此,本研究使用德国机构面板数据来估计劳动力需求模型。此外,为了避免选择性,在回归中引入了赫克曼校正。随机效应和分数面板概率估计的结果表明,自身工资和产出弹性的绝对值较低,因此支持了家族企业比其他企业提供更高的工作保障和更规避风险的假设。然而,如果调查仅限于拥有20名或20名以上员工的机构,则这一结果不成立。没有证据表明大型家族企业存在不同的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Family firms and labor demand: Size matters - but only the small ones are different
This paper analyzes the differences in labor demand between family and non-family firms. The majority of firms in modern economies are still family controlled. In addition, these firms seem to exhibit better employment performance than other companies. Therefore, this study estimates a labor demand model with German establishment panel data. Moreover, a Heckman correction is introduced to the regressions to avoid selectivity. The results of random effects and fractional panel probit estimations indicate that own-wage and output elasticities are lower in absolute values, thus supporting the assumption that family firms offer higher job security and are more risk averse than other establishments. However, this result does not hold if the investigation is restricted to establishments with 20 or more employees. There is no evidence of different behavior in larger family firms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: CESifo Economic Studies publishes provocative, high-quality papers in economics, with a particular focus on policy issues. Papers by leading academics are written for a wide and global audience, including those in government, business, and academia. The journal combines theory and empirical research in a style accessible to economists across all specialisations.
期刊最新文献
Partisan Influences in Dutch Politics Wages and Inflation in the Euro Area Uncovering the (Possible) Relationship between Central Bank Independence and Economic Growth in the Context of Monetary Unions Gender Gaps in Housework Activities in Europe before and after COVID-19 Party Politics in Austria: From Proporz to Populism?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1