参与挑战:青少年保护服务中青少年认知补救的可行性和可接受性

IF 0.4 Q4 PEDIATRICS Adolescent Psychiatry Pub Date : 2022-05-07 DOI:10.2174/2210676612666220507010146
Élisabeth Thibaudeau, Alexandra R.-Mercier, T. Wykes, C. Reeder, Karianne Guay, Danielle Nadeau, Geneviève Dufour, M. Cella, C. Cellard
{"title":"参与挑战:青少年保护服务中青少年认知补救的可行性和可接受性","authors":"Élisabeth Thibaudeau, Alexandra R.-Mercier, T. Wykes, C. Reeder, Karianne Guay, Danielle Nadeau, Geneviève Dufour, M. Cella, C. Cellard","doi":"10.2174/2210676612666220507010146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nHistory of childhood maltreatment is recognized as an important risk factor for the development of mental health and cognitive difficulties. Cognitive difficulties are associated with impairments in everyday functioning in different domains such as school or work. To date, no study has evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) with teenagers with a history of childhood maltreatment.\n\n\n\nThe objective was to assess the acceptability and feasibility of the CIRCuiTS program for teenagers in youth protection services and to explore the preliminary effect on clinical and neuropsychological outcomes.\n\n\n\nTen participants were first assessed with clinical and neuropsychological measures. They then received a mean of 16 CRT sessions with the CIRCuiTS program adapted for teenagers. The same measures as baseline were repeated directly after the end of treatment, as well as 3-months and 1-year post-treatment. Descriptive statistics were used to assess feasibility and acceptability, while the preliminary effect of CIRCuiTS was assessed with Reliable Change Indices (RCIs).\n\n\n\nCIRCuiTS was considered as acceptable by both participants and therapists for the attractiveness of the program, its easiness of use and understanding and its cultural adaptability. However, the feasibility was limited with only 50% of participants having had completed CIRCuiTS. This was mostly explained by contextual factors. RCIs revealed significant improvements in several neuropsychological domains, as well as a decline in other domains.\n\n\n\nThis pilot study highlights challenges that must be addressed to promote engagement to CRT for teenagers in the care of youth protection services.\n","PeriodicalId":43326,"journal":{"name":"Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Engagement Challenge: Feasibility and Acceptability of Cognitive Remediation for Teenagers in the Care of Youth Protection Services\",\"authors\":\"Élisabeth Thibaudeau, Alexandra R.-Mercier, T. Wykes, C. Reeder, Karianne Guay, Danielle Nadeau, Geneviève Dufour, M. Cella, C. Cellard\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/2210676612666220507010146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nHistory of childhood maltreatment is recognized as an important risk factor for the development of mental health and cognitive difficulties. Cognitive difficulties are associated with impairments in everyday functioning in different domains such as school or work. To date, no study has evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) with teenagers with a history of childhood maltreatment.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe objective was to assess the acceptability and feasibility of the CIRCuiTS program for teenagers in youth protection services and to explore the preliminary effect on clinical and neuropsychological outcomes.\\n\\n\\n\\nTen participants were first assessed with clinical and neuropsychological measures. They then received a mean of 16 CRT sessions with the CIRCuiTS program adapted for teenagers. The same measures as baseline were repeated directly after the end of treatment, as well as 3-months and 1-year post-treatment. Descriptive statistics were used to assess feasibility and acceptability, while the preliminary effect of CIRCuiTS was assessed with Reliable Change Indices (RCIs).\\n\\n\\n\\nCIRCuiTS was considered as acceptable by both participants and therapists for the attractiveness of the program, its easiness of use and understanding and its cultural adaptability. However, the feasibility was limited with only 50% of participants having had completed CIRCuiTS. This was mostly explained by contextual factors. RCIs revealed significant improvements in several neuropsychological domains, as well as a decline in other domains.\\n\\n\\n\\nThis pilot study highlights challenges that must be addressed to promote engagement to CRT for teenagers in the care of youth protection services.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/2210676612666220507010146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2210676612666220507010146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿童虐待史被认为是心理健康和认知困难发展的重要危险因素。认知困难与不同领域的日常功能受损有关,如学校或工作。到目前为止,还没有研究评估认知补救疗法(CRT)对有童年虐待史的青少年的可行性和可接受性。目的是评估青少年在青少年保护服务中的可接受性和可行性,并探讨其对临床和神经心理学结果的初步影响。首先对10名参与者进行临床和神经心理学评估。然后,他们平均接受了16次针对青少年的电路项目的CRT治疗。治疗结束后直接重复与基线相同的测量,以及治疗后3个月和1年。采用描述性统计评估可行性和可接受性,采用可靠变化指数(rci)评估电路的初步效果。参与者和治疗师都认为电路是可以接受的,因为它具有吸引力,易于使用和理解,并且具有文化适应性。然而,可行性是有限的,只有50%的参与者完成了电路。这主要是由环境因素来解释的。rci在一些神经心理学领域显示出显著的改善,而在其他领域则有所下降。这项试验研究强调了必须解决的挑战,以促进青少年参与青少年保护服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Engagement Challenge: Feasibility and Acceptability of Cognitive Remediation for Teenagers in the Care of Youth Protection Services
History of childhood maltreatment is recognized as an important risk factor for the development of mental health and cognitive difficulties. Cognitive difficulties are associated with impairments in everyday functioning in different domains such as school or work. To date, no study has evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) with teenagers with a history of childhood maltreatment. The objective was to assess the acceptability and feasibility of the CIRCuiTS program for teenagers in youth protection services and to explore the preliminary effect on clinical and neuropsychological outcomes. Ten participants were first assessed with clinical and neuropsychological measures. They then received a mean of 16 CRT sessions with the CIRCuiTS program adapted for teenagers. The same measures as baseline were repeated directly after the end of treatment, as well as 3-months and 1-year post-treatment. Descriptive statistics were used to assess feasibility and acceptability, while the preliminary effect of CIRCuiTS was assessed with Reliable Change Indices (RCIs). CIRCuiTS was considered as acceptable by both participants and therapists for the attractiveness of the program, its easiness of use and understanding and its cultural adaptability. However, the feasibility was limited with only 50% of participants having had completed CIRCuiTS. This was mostly explained by contextual factors. RCIs revealed significant improvements in several neuropsychological domains, as well as a decline in other domains. This pilot study highlights challenges that must be addressed to promote engagement to CRT for teenagers in the care of youth protection services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Adolescent Psychiatry
Adolescent Psychiatry PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Adolescent Psychiatry a peer-reviewed journal, aims to provide mental health professionals who work with adolescents with current information relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric disorders in adolescents. Adolescent Psychiatry reports of original research, critical reviews of topics relevant to practitioners, clinical observations with analysis and discussion, analysis of philosophical, ethical or social aspects of the fields of psychiatry and mental health, case reports with discussions, letters, and position papers. Topics include adolescent development and developmental psychopathology, psychotherapy and other psychosocial treatment approaches, psychopharmacology, and service settings and programs. The primary focus of the work should be on adolescents, transition-aged youth, The primary focus of the work should be on adolescents, transition-aged youth, or emerging adults, that is, persons 12-24 years of age . Articles on families of adolescents, or adults who have been followed since adolescence will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
ADHD Symptoms Among Adolescents: Factor Structure Based on Mother and Adolescent Self-Ratings Social Media and Fear of Missing Out: An Exploration of the Role of Mindfulness, Cognitive Biases and Need to Belong in Chinese College Students A Brief Review of Flourishing Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Mood and Anxiety Disorders Impact of Changing Cannabis Laws on Cannabis Use Disorders, Serious Mental Illness, and Mortality Outcomes in US Youth: A Narrative Review Effects of Cannabidiol in Adolescent and Young Adult Depressive and Anxiety Disorders: A Systematic Review of Clinical and Preclinical Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1