护士幸福感及其对人力资源管理的影响:一项系统的文献综述

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS International Journal of Management Reviews Pub Date : 2022-04-18 DOI:10.1111/ijmr.12295
Qijie Xiao, Fang Lee Cooke, Lanlan Chen
{"title":"护士幸福感及其对人力资源管理的影响:一项系统的文献综述","authors":"Qijie Xiao,&nbsp;Fang Lee Cooke,&nbsp;Lanlan Chen","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.12295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As the largest workforce to provide patient care in the healthcare industry, nurses’ well-being issues have attracted increasing research and practical attention. Extant studies have identified diverse causes of nurses’ poor states of well-being. However, little research has offered a holistic evaluation that brings cross-level factors together to untangle the complexity of nurses’ well-being. Current literature has yet to capture the different but inter-connected nature of three dimensions of nurses’ well-being (health, happiness, and relationships). In 2020 and 2021, we conducted a systematic search of various academic databases. Based on a systematic review of 91 articles published between 1994 and 2020, we have created a multi-perspective, multi-level, and multi-faceted model of nurses’ well-being. In doing so, we contribute to contemporary literature in three ways. First, based on a combination of the job demands-resources (JDR) model and social exchange theory, we provide a comprehensive understanding of multi-level factors influencing nurses’ well-being. Second, we identify three different but inter-linked facets of nurses’ well-being (health-, happiness-, and relationship-related well-being). Third, we adopt various perspectives to identify the process through which well-being-oriented human resource management (HRM) enhances nurses’ well-being. We encourage healthcare organizations to implement well-being-oriented HRM by investing in nursing staff, providing engaging work, improving nurses’ voices, creating nursing-friendly work environments, and offering multiple job-related supports.</p>","PeriodicalId":48326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Reviews","volume":"24 4","pages":"599-624"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurses’ well-being and implications for human resource management: A systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"Qijie Xiao,&nbsp;Fang Lee Cooke,&nbsp;Lanlan Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijmr.12295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>As the largest workforce to provide patient care in the healthcare industry, nurses’ well-being issues have attracted increasing research and practical attention. Extant studies have identified diverse causes of nurses’ poor states of well-being. However, little research has offered a holistic evaluation that brings cross-level factors together to untangle the complexity of nurses’ well-being. Current literature has yet to capture the different but inter-connected nature of three dimensions of nurses’ well-being (health, happiness, and relationships). In 2020 and 2021, we conducted a systematic search of various academic databases. Based on a systematic review of 91 articles published between 1994 and 2020, we have created a multi-perspective, multi-level, and multi-faceted model of nurses’ well-being. In doing so, we contribute to contemporary literature in three ways. First, based on a combination of the job demands-resources (JDR) model and social exchange theory, we provide a comprehensive understanding of multi-level factors influencing nurses’ well-being. Second, we identify three different but inter-linked facets of nurses’ well-being (health-, happiness-, and relationship-related well-being). Third, we adopt various perspectives to identify the process through which well-being-oriented human resource management (HRM) enhances nurses’ well-being. We encourage healthcare organizations to implement well-being-oriented HRM by investing in nursing staff, providing engaging work, improving nurses’ voices, creating nursing-friendly work environments, and offering multiple job-related supports.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Management Reviews\",\"volume\":\"24 4\",\"pages\":\"599-624\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Management Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijmr.12295\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijmr.12295","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

作为医疗保健行业中提供患者护理的最大劳动力,护士的福祉问题已经引起了越来越多的研究和实践关注。现有的研究已经确定了护士健康状况不佳的多种原因。然而,很少有研究提供了一个全面的评估,将跨层次的因素结合在一起,以解开护士福祉的复杂性。目前的文献还没有捕捉到护士幸福的三个维度(健康、幸福和关系)的不同但相互联系的本质。在2020年和2021年,我们对各种学术数据库进行了系统的检索。基于对1994年至2020年间发表的91篇文章的系统回顾,我们创建了一个多视角、多层次、多方面的护士幸福感模型。在这样做的过程中,我们以三种方式为当代文学做出了贡献。首先,结合工作需求-资源(job demand -resources, JDR)模型和社会交换理论,全面了解护士幸福感的多层次影响因素。其次,我们确定了护士福祉的三个不同但相互关联的方面(健康,幸福和关系相关的福祉)。第三,我们采用不同的视角来确定以福祉为导向的人力资源管理(HRM)提高护士福祉的过程。我们鼓励医疗保健组织通过投资于护理人员,提供有吸引力的工作,改善护士的声音,创造护理友好的工作环境,并提供多种与工作相关的支持,来实施面向福祉的人力资源管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nurses’ well-being and implications for human resource management: A systematic literature review

As the largest workforce to provide patient care in the healthcare industry, nurses’ well-being issues have attracted increasing research and practical attention. Extant studies have identified diverse causes of nurses’ poor states of well-being. However, little research has offered a holistic evaluation that brings cross-level factors together to untangle the complexity of nurses’ well-being. Current literature has yet to capture the different but inter-connected nature of three dimensions of nurses’ well-being (health, happiness, and relationships). In 2020 and 2021, we conducted a systematic search of various academic databases. Based on a systematic review of 91 articles published between 1994 and 2020, we have created a multi-perspective, multi-level, and multi-faceted model of nurses’ well-being. In doing so, we contribute to contemporary literature in three ways. First, based on a combination of the job demands-resources (JDR) model and social exchange theory, we provide a comprehensive understanding of multi-level factors influencing nurses’ well-being. Second, we identify three different but inter-linked facets of nurses’ well-being (health-, happiness-, and relationship-related well-being). Third, we adopt various perspectives to identify the process through which well-being-oriented human resource management (HRM) enhances nurses’ well-being. We encourage healthcare organizations to implement well-being-oriented HRM by investing in nursing staff, providing engaging work, improving nurses’ voices, creating nursing-friendly work environments, and offering multiple job-related supports.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Management Reviews (IJMR) stands as the premier global review journal in Organisation and Management Studies (OMS). Its published papers aim to provide substantial conceptual contributions, acting as a strategic platform for new research directions. IJMR plays a pivotal role in influencing how OMS scholars conceptualize research in their respective fields. The journal's reviews critically assess the state of knowledge in specific fields, appraising the conceptual foundations of competing paradigms to advance current and future research in the area.
期刊最新文献
Uncovering the impact of digital technologies on strategising: Evidence from a systematic literature review One name for two concepts: A systematic literature review about meta‐organizations Career success and geographical location: A systematic review and future research agenda Towards a heuristic view of managerial heuristics: Integrating divergent perspectives The good, the bad and the evil: A unified conceptualization of negative leadership behaviour
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1