法律哲学和刑法教条的方法

Q4 Social Sciences Prudentia Iuris Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.46553/prudentia.93.2022.pp.77-104
L. Schonfeld
{"title":"法律哲学和刑法教条的方法","authors":"L. Schonfeld","doi":"10.46553/prudentia.93.2022.pp.77-104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This work aims to highlight that criminal dogmatic has not received the cur-rent state of the philosophical debate. It will only address the issue of legal method and the consequences that, had they been received, would have had for criminal dogmatic. It is proposed to overcome the syllogistic-subsunctive method, both with respect to positive law and the concepts of crime theory and the consequent assumption of more Aristotelian open methods, such as topical and rhetoric. It will also be shown that such opening does not contradict the requirement of criminal legality.","PeriodicalId":36086,"journal":{"name":"Prudentia Iuris","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El método en la Filosofía del Derecho y la Dogmática Penal\",\"authors\":\"L. Schonfeld\",\"doi\":\"10.46553/prudentia.93.2022.pp.77-104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": This work aims to highlight that criminal dogmatic has not received the cur-rent state of the philosophical debate. It will only address the issue of legal method and the consequences that, had they been received, would have had for criminal dogmatic. It is proposed to overcome the syllogistic-subsunctive method, both with respect to positive law and the concepts of crime theory and the consequent assumption of more Aristotelian open methods, such as topical and rhetoric. It will also be shown that such opening does not contradict the requirement of criminal legality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prudentia Iuris\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prudentia Iuris\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46553/prudentia.93.2022.pp.77-104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prudentia Iuris","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46553/prudentia.93.2022.pp.77-104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

:这部作品旨在强调刑事教条主义并没有受到哲学辩论的当前状态。它只会解决法律方法的问题,以及如果收到法律方法和后果,就会对刑事教条主义产生的后果。它被提议克服三段论的包含方法,无论是关于实证法和犯罪理论的概念,还是随之而来的对更亚里士多德开放方法的假设,如主题和修辞。还将表明,这种开放并不违背刑事合法性的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
El método en la Filosofía del Derecho y la Dogmática Penal
: This work aims to highlight that criminal dogmatic has not received the cur-rent state of the philosophical debate. It will only address the issue of legal method and the consequences that, had they been received, would have had for criminal dogmatic. It is proposed to overcome the syllogistic-subsunctive method, both with respect to positive law and the concepts of crime theory and the consequent assumption of more Aristotelian open methods, such as topical and rhetoric. It will also be shown that such opening does not contradict the requirement of criminal legality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prudentia Iuris
Prudentia Iuris Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
La familia como fundamento del Estado Constitucional. Una investigación pretendidamente radical Comisión por omisión y causalidad La jurisprudencia en una economía con tipo de cambio múltiple. El caso de Argentina 2020-2023. ¿Francisco de Vitoria ideólogo del imperialismo? Revisión crítica de algunas interpretaciones recientes. La vigencia del derecho natural en el derecho positivo de todas las comunidades
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1