{"title":"半定量高效薄层色谱法筛选和验证了印度半丝藻根提取物中羽扇豆醇、乙酸羽扇豆酯、β-谷甾醇、ρ-香豆酸和原儿茶酸的含量。","authors":"Sujith Thatipelli , Murugammal Shanmugam , Shakila Ramachandran , Gopinath Pushparathinam","doi":"10.1016/j.jarmap.2023.100510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>H. indicus</em><span> (L.) R. Br. roots are widely used in traditional medicine systems in India. </span><em>D. hamiltonii</em> Wight & Arn. It looks like <em>H. indicus</em><span> and is substituted in the traditional herbal market. Five marker compounds, namely lupeol<span>, lupeol acetate (LA), β-sitosterol (BS), ρ-coumaric acid (PC) and protocatechuic acid (PCA) were quantified, and the method was validated. Separation of lupeol (R</span></span><sub>f</sub> max 0.48), LA (R<sub>f</sub> max 0.75) and BS (R<sub>f</sub><span><span> max 0.36) was achieved using hexane: </span>ethyl acetate (8:2, </span><em>v/v</em>) and scanned at λ520 nm after derivatization with vanillin–sulphuric acid reagent (VSR). For PC (R<sub>f</sub> 0.59) and PCA (R<sub>f</sub><span> 0.47), the separation was performed using toluene: ethyl acetate: formic acid (7:5:0.5, </span><em>v/v/v</em>) and scanned at λ254 nm. The validation parameters include linearity, accuracy, precision, the limit of detection and quantification (LOD and LOQ), repeatability, specificity and recovery as per ICH guidelines. Lupeol, LA and BS were found to be present in both plants; PC was present in <em>H. indicus,</em> and PCA was present in <em>D. hamiltonii</em>. The calibration plots were linear in the range (<em>μ</em>g/band) of 5–15 for lupeol; 20–45 for LA; 1–5 for PC; 5–20 for BS, and PCA. The LOD were 0.0181, 0.023, 0.080, 0.0021 and 0.0019 (<em>μ</em>g/band) for lupeol, LA, BS, PC and PCA, respectively, concerning area, correlation coefficients (r<sup>2</sup>) were 0.9980, 0.9988, 0.9958, 0.9998 and 0.9938 for lupeol, LA, BS, PC and PCA respectively. The validated high-performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) method provided an excellent linear relationship for all the quantified analytes; hence it may be used for quantitative estimation of the above markers to assess the quality of <em>H. indicus</em> and <em>D. hamiltonii</em> or herbal formulations containing them.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15136,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening and validated semi - quantification high-performance thin layer chromatography method development for lupeol, lupeol acetate, β-sitosterol, ρ-coumaric acid and proto-catechuic acid in the root extracts of Hemidesmus indicus (L.) R.Br. & Decalepis hamiltonii Wight & Arn.\",\"authors\":\"Sujith Thatipelli , Murugammal Shanmugam , Shakila Ramachandran , Gopinath Pushparathinam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jarmap.2023.100510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><em>H. indicus</em><span> (L.) R. Br. roots are widely used in traditional medicine systems in India. </span><em>D. hamiltonii</em> Wight & Arn. It looks like <em>H. indicus</em><span> and is substituted in the traditional herbal market. Five marker compounds, namely lupeol<span>, lupeol acetate (LA), β-sitosterol (BS), ρ-coumaric acid (PC) and protocatechuic acid (PCA) were quantified, and the method was validated. Separation of lupeol (R</span></span><sub>f</sub> max 0.48), LA (R<sub>f</sub> max 0.75) and BS (R<sub>f</sub><span><span> max 0.36) was achieved using hexane: </span>ethyl acetate (8:2, </span><em>v/v</em>) and scanned at λ520 nm after derivatization with vanillin–sulphuric acid reagent (VSR). For PC (R<sub>f</sub> 0.59) and PCA (R<sub>f</sub><span> 0.47), the separation was performed using toluene: ethyl acetate: formic acid (7:5:0.5, </span><em>v/v/v</em>) and scanned at λ254 nm. The validation parameters include linearity, accuracy, precision, the limit of detection and quantification (LOD and LOQ), repeatability, specificity and recovery as per ICH guidelines. Lupeol, LA and BS were found to be present in both plants; PC was present in <em>H. indicus,</em> and PCA was present in <em>D. hamiltonii</em>. The calibration plots were linear in the range (<em>μ</em>g/band) of 5–15 for lupeol; 20–45 for LA; 1–5 for PC; 5–20 for BS, and PCA. The LOD were 0.0181, 0.023, 0.080, 0.0021 and 0.0019 (<em>μ</em>g/band) for lupeol, LA, BS, PC and PCA, respectively, concerning area, correlation coefficients (r<sup>2</sup>) were 0.9980, 0.9988, 0.9958, 0.9998 and 0.9938 for lupeol, LA, BS, PC and PCA respectively. The validated high-performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) method provided an excellent linear relationship for all the quantified analytes; hence it may be used for quantitative estimation of the above markers to assess the quality of <em>H. indicus</em> and <em>D. hamiltonii</em> or herbal formulations containing them.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214786123000542\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214786123000542","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
籼稻(L.)r . Br。根在印度的传统医学系统中被广泛使用。D.汉密尔顿·怀特&;在攻击。它看起来像梧桐,在传统的草药市场上被取代。测定了鹿皮醇、鹿皮醇醋酸酯(LA)、β-谷甾醇(BS)、ρ-香豆酸(PC)和原儿茶酸(PCA) 5种标记化合物,并对方法进行了验证。用己烷:乙酸乙酯(8:2,v/v)分离了芦皮醇(Rf max 0.48)、LA (Rf max 0.75)和BS (Rf max 0.36),用香兰素-硫酸试剂(VSR)衍生后在λ520 nm处扫描。对于PC (Rf 0.59)和PCA (Rf 0.47),采用甲苯:乙酸乙酯:甲酸(7:5:5 .5,v/v/v)进行分离,扫描波长为λ254 nm。验证参数包括线性、准确度、精密度、检测限和定量限(LOD和LOQ)、可重复性、特异性和回收率。在这两种植物中均发现了Lupeol、LA和BS;在籼稻中存在PC,在哈密顿稻中存在PCA。芦皮醇在5 ~ 15 μg/波段范围内具有良好的线性关系;洛杉矶20-45;PC 1-5;BS 5-20, PCA 5-20。lupeol、LA、BS、PC和PCA的LOD分别为0.0181、0.023、0.080、0.0021和0.0019 (μg/波段),面积相关系数(r2)分别为0.9980、0.9988、0.9958、0.9998和0.9938。经验证的高效薄层色谱(HPTLC)方法对所有定量分析物均具有良好的线性关系;因此,该方法可用于对上述标记的定量评价,以评价籼稻和哈密顿草或含有它们的中药制剂的质量。
Screening and validated semi - quantification high-performance thin layer chromatography method development for lupeol, lupeol acetate, β-sitosterol, ρ-coumaric acid and proto-catechuic acid in the root extracts of Hemidesmus indicus (L.) R.Br. & Decalepis hamiltonii Wight & Arn.
H. indicus (L.) R. Br. roots are widely used in traditional medicine systems in India. D. hamiltonii Wight & Arn. It looks like H. indicus and is substituted in the traditional herbal market. Five marker compounds, namely lupeol, lupeol acetate (LA), β-sitosterol (BS), ρ-coumaric acid (PC) and protocatechuic acid (PCA) were quantified, and the method was validated. Separation of lupeol (Rf max 0.48), LA (Rf max 0.75) and BS (Rf max 0.36) was achieved using hexane: ethyl acetate (8:2, v/v) and scanned at λ520 nm after derivatization with vanillin–sulphuric acid reagent (VSR). For PC (Rf 0.59) and PCA (Rf 0.47), the separation was performed using toluene: ethyl acetate: formic acid (7:5:0.5, v/v/v) and scanned at λ254 nm. The validation parameters include linearity, accuracy, precision, the limit of detection and quantification (LOD and LOQ), repeatability, specificity and recovery as per ICH guidelines. Lupeol, LA and BS were found to be present in both plants; PC was present in H. indicus, and PCA was present in D. hamiltonii. The calibration plots were linear in the range (μg/band) of 5–15 for lupeol; 20–45 for LA; 1–5 for PC; 5–20 for BS, and PCA. The LOD were 0.0181, 0.023, 0.080, 0.0021 and 0.0019 (μg/band) for lupeol, LA, BS, PC and PCA, respectively, concerning area, correlation coefficients (r2) were 0.9980, 0.9988, 0.9958, 0.9998 and 0.9938 for lupeol, LA, BS, PC and PCA respectively. The validated high-performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) method provided an excellent linear relationship for all the quantified analytes; hence it may be used for quantitative estimation of the above markers to assess the quality of H. indicus and D. hamiltonii or herbal formulations containing them.
期刊介绍:
JARMAP is a peer reviewed and multidisciplinary communication platform, covering all aspects of the raw material supply chain of medicinal and aromatic plants. JARMAP aims to improve production of tailor made commodities by addressing the various requirements of manufacturers of herbal medicines, herbal teas, seasoning herbs, food and feed supplements and cosmetics. JARMAP covers research on genetic resources, breeding, wild-collection, domestication, propagation, cultivation, phytopathology and plant protection, mechanization, conservation, processing, quality assurance, analytics and economics. JARMAP publishes reviews, original research articles and short communications related to research.