机器学习中的风险评估增强了故障模式和影响分析

IF 1.7 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Data Technologies and Applications Pub Date : 2023-05-04 DOI:10.1108/dta-06-2022-0232
Zeping Wang, Hengte Du, Liangyan Tao, S. Javed
{"title":"机器学习中的风险评估增强了故障模式和影响分析","authors":"Zeping Wang, Hengte Du, Liangyan Tao, S. Javed","doi":"10.1108/dta-06-2022-0232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe traditional failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) has some limitations, such as the neglect of relevant historical data, subjective use of rating numbering and the less rationality and accuracy of the Risk Priority Number. The current study proposes a machine learning–enhanced FMEA (ML-FMEA) method based on a popular machine learning tool, Waikato environment for knowledge analysis (WEKA).Design/methodology/approachThis work uses the collected FMEA historical data to predict the probability of component/product failure risk by machine learning based on different commonly used classifiers. To compare the correct classification rate of ML-FMEA based on different classifiers, the 10-fold cross-validation is employed. Moreover, the prediction error is estimated by repeated experiments with different random seeds under varying initialization settings. Finally, the case of the submersible pump in Bhattacharjee et al. (2020) is utilized to test the performance of the proposed method.FindingsThe results show that ML-FMEA, based on most of the commonly used classifiers, outperforms the Bhattacharjee model. For example, the ML-FMEA based on Random Committee improves the correct classification rate from 77.47 to 90.09 per cent and area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) from 80.9 to 91.8 per cent, respectively.Originality/valueThe proposed method not only enables the decision-maker to use the historical failure data and predict the probability of the risk of failure but also may pave a new way for the application of machine learning techniques in FMEA.","PeriodicalId":56156,"journal":{"name":"Data Technologies and Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk assessment in machine learning enhanced failure mode and effects analysis\",\"authors\":\"Zeping Wang, Hengte Du, Liangyan Tao, S. Javed\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/dta-06-2022-0232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe traditional failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) has some limitations, such as the neglect of relevant historical data, subjective use of rating numbering and the less rationality and accuracy of the Risk Priority Number. The current study proposes a machine learning–enhanced FMEA (ML-FMEA) method based on a popular machine learning tool, Waikato environment for knowledge analysis (WEKA).Design/methodology/approachThis work uses the collected FMEA historical data to predict the probability of component/product failure risk by machine learning based on different commonly used classifiers. To compare the correct classification rate of ML-FMEA based on different classifiers, the 10-fold cross-validation is employed. Moreover, the prediction error is estimated by repeated experiments with different random seeds under varying initialization settings. Finally, the case of the submersible pump in Bhattacharjee et al. (2020) is utilized to test the performance of the proposed method.FindingsThe results show that ML-FMEA, based on most of the commonly used classifiers, outperforms the Bhattacharjee model. For example, the ML-FMEA based on Random Committee improves the correct classification rate from 77.47 to 90.09 per cent and area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) from 80.9 to 91.8 per cent, respectively.Originality/valueThe proposed method not only enables the decision-maker to use the historical failure data and predict the probability of the risk of failure but also may pave a new way for the application of machine learning techniques in FMEA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Data Technologies and Applications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Data Technologies and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/dta-06-2022-0232\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data Technologies and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dta-06-2022-0232","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的传统的失效模式与影响分析(FMEA)存在忽视相关历史数据、主观使用评级编号、风险优先级编号的合理性和准确性不高等局限性。本研究提出了一种机器学习增强的FMEA (ML-FMEA)方法,该方法基于一种流行的机器学习工具,Waikato环境for knowledge analysis (WEKA)。设计/方法/方法本工作使用收集的FMEA历史数据,通过基于不同常用分类器的机器学习来预测组件/产品故障风险的概率。为了比较不同分类器对ML-FMEA的分类正确率,采用10倍交叉验证。通过不同初始化设置下不同随机种子的重复实验估计预测误差。最后,利用Bhattacharjee等人(2020)的潜水泵案例来测试所提出方法的性能。结果表明,基于大多数常用分类器的ML-FMEA优于Bhattacharjee模型。例如,基于Random Committee的ML-FMEA将分类正确率从77.47提高到90.09%,将受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)曲线下面积从80.9%提高到91.8%。提出的方法不仅使决策者能够使用历史故障数据并预测故障风险的概率,而且为机器学习技术在FMEA中的应用铺平了新的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk assessment in machine learning enhanced failure mode and effects analysis
PurposeThe traditional failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) has some limitations, such as the neglect of relevant historical data, subjective use of rating numbering and the less rationality and accuracy of the Risk Priority Number. The current study proposes a machine learning–enhanced FMEA (ML-FMEA) method based on a popular machine learning tool, Waikato environment for knowledge analysis (WEKA).Design/methodology/approachThis work uses the collected FMEA historical data to predict the probability of component/product failure risk by machine learning based on different commonly used classifiers. To compare the correct classification rate of ML-FMEA based on different classifiers, the 10-fold cross-validation is employed. Moreover, the prediction error is estimated by repeated experiments with different random seeds under varying initialization settings. Finally, the case of the submersible pump in Bhattacharjee et al. (2020) is utilized to test the performance of the proposed method.FindingsThe results show that ML-FMEA, based on most of the commonly used classifiers, outperforms the Bhattacharjee model. For example, the ML-FMEA based on Random Committee improves the correct classification rate from 77.47 to 90.09 per cent and area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) from 80.9 to 91.8 per cent, respectively.Originality/valueThe proposed method not only enables the decision-maker to use the historical failure data and predict the probability of the risk of failure but also may pave a new way for the application of machine learning techniques in FMEA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Data Technologies and Applications
Data Technologies and Applications Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Previously published as: Program Online from: 2018 Subject Area: Information & Knowledge Management, Library Studies
期刊最新文献
Understanding customer behavior by mapping complaints to personality based on social media textual data A systematic review of the use of FHIR to support clinical research, public health and medical education Novel framework for learning performance prediction using pattern identification and deep learning A comparative analysis of job satisfaction prediction models using machine learning: a mixed-method approach Assessing the alignment of corporate ESG disclosures with the UN sustainable development goals: a BERT-based text analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1