对外法语词汇搭配及其习得研究

Q3 Arts and Humanities Sustainable Multilingualism Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.2478/sm-2022-0008
Vitalija Kazlauskienė
{"title":"对外法语词汇搭配及其习得研究","authors":"Vitalija Kazlauskienė","doi":"10.2478/sm-2022-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The importance of stereotypical uses of language is recognized by most didactic studies of the vocabulary (Granger and Paquot, 2008). Collocations are an area of vocabulary which is difficult to master by non-native learners. This type of lexical relation often presents itself as a semi-frozen binary lexical co-occurrence. The meaning of collocations is often transparent in reception, while in production, it requires a special effort on behalf of the learner. In this paper, we have tried to verify this assertion by comparing the corpus of French language and that of learners, and to define the regularities of lexical combinations in the French interlanguage of Lithuanian learners with level B1. Thanks to the corpus at our disposal, we observed that nomino-adjectival collocations at this level are more frequent than verbal collocations. However, in the percentage of total, the number of collocations only represents a contingent part of the corpus. The corpus also reveals that the present combination of words is not always diversified either by its syntax or by its lexical content, which is sometimes atypical of standard French. Learners choose from a fairly limited number of rather free lexical units. The process of interference and hybridization can be seen as an essential contamination of collocations, both lexically and syntactically. The data received makes it possible to note that collocational competence is insufficient. The results of this study also show that the analysis of collocational constructions can reveal the relationships between competence and performance of speakers.","PeriodicalId":52368,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Multilingualism","volume":"20 1","pages":"194 - 209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lexical Collocations and their Acquisition in French as a Foreign Language (FLE)\",\"authors\":\"Vitalija Kazlauskienė\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/sm-2022-0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary The importance of stereotypical uses of language is recognized by most didactic studies of the vocabulary (Granger and Paquot, 2008). Collocations are an area of vocabulary which is difficult to master by non-native learners. This type of lexical relation often presents itself as a semi-frozen binary lexical co-occurrence. The meaning of collocations is often transparent in reception, while in production, it requires a special effort on behalf of the learner. In this paper, we have tried to verify this assertion by comparing the corpus of French language and that of learners, and to define the regularities of lexical combinations in the French interlanguage of Lithuanian learners with level B1. Thanks to the corpus at our disposal, we observed that nomino-adjectival collocations at this level are more frequent than verbal collocations. However, in the percentage of total, the number of collocations only represents a contingent part of the corpus. The corpus also reveals that the present combination of words is not always diversified either by its syntax or by its lexical content, which is sometimes atypical of standard French. Learners choose from a fairly limited number of rather free lexical units. The process of interference and hybridization can be seen as an essential contamination of collocations, both lexically and syntactically. The data received makes it possible to note that collocational competence is insufficient. The results of this study also show that the analysis of collocational constructions can reveal the relationships between competence and performance of speakers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Multilingualism\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"194 - 209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Multilingualism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/sm-2022-0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Multilingualism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sm-2022-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数对词汇的说教性研究都认识到对语言的刻板使用的重要性(Granger和Paquot,2008)。搭配是非母语学习者很难掌握的一个词汇领域。这种类型的词汇关系通常表现为半冻结的二元词汇共现。搭配的含义在接受中通常是透明的,而在制作中,它需要为学习者付出特殊的努力。在本文中,我们试图通过比较法语语料库和学习者的语料库来验证这一论断,并定义B1级立陶宛学习者法语中介语中词汇组合的规律。多亏了我们掌握的语料库,我们观察到这一级别的名词形容词搭配比言语搭配更频繁。然而,在总数的百分比中,搭配的数量只代表语料库的一个偶然部分。语料库还表明,目前的单词组合并不总是因语法或词汇内容而多样化,这有时是标准法语的非典型现象。学习者从数量相当有限的相当自由的词汇单元中进行选择。在词汇和句法上,干扰和杂交的过程可以被视为对搭配的一种本质污染。从收到的数据可以看出,搭配能力不足。研究结果还表明,搭配结构的分析可以揭示说话人的能力与表现之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lexical Collocations and their Acquisition in French as a Foreign Language (FLE)
Summary The importance of stereotypical uses of language is recognized by most didactic studies of the vocabulary (Granger and Paquot, 2008). Collocations are an area of vocabulary which is difficult to master by non-native learners. This type of lexical relation often presents itself as a semi-frozen binary lexical co-occurrence. The meaning of collocations is often transparent in reception, while in production, it requires a special effort on behalf of the learner. In this paper, we have tried to verify this assertion by comparing the corpus of French language and that of learners, and to define the regularities of lexical combinations in the French interlanguage of Lithuanian learners with level B1. Thanks to the corpus at our disposal, we observed that nomino-adjectival collocations at this level are more frequent than verbal collocations. However, in the percentage of total, the number of collocations only represents a contingent part of the corpus. The corpus also reveals that the present combination of words is not always diversified either by its syntax or by its lexical content, which is sometimes atypical of standard French. Learners choose from a fairly limited number of rather free lexical units. The process of interference and hybridization can be seen as an essential contamination of collocations, both lexically and syntactically. The data received makes it possible to note that collocational competence is insufficient. The results of this study also show that the analysis of collocational constructions can reveal the relationships between competence and performance of speakers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Multilingualism
Sustainable Multilingualism Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
39 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Role of Linguistic and Cultural Mediation in Learning the Host Country’s Language Lip Synchrony of Bilabial Consonants in the Lithuanian Dubbed Live-Action Film a Dog's Way Home The Nomenclature of Traditional Ornaments in Latvian and Lithuanian Language Attitudes and Policy Preferences: Insights From International Scholarship Applicants to Hungarian Universities Translanguaging in Teaching and Learning of English at University Level: The Perspectives of Ukrainian Students and their Teachers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1