书评:泰森·刘易斯,沃尔特·本杰明的反法西斯主义教育:从谜语到广播

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Theory and Research in Education Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI:10.1177/14778785211060211
Harvey D. Shapiro
{"title":"书评:泰森·刘易斯,沃尔特·本杰明的反法西斯主义教育:从谜语到广播","authors":"Harvey D. Shapiro","doi":"10.1177/14778785211060211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tyson Lewis has a remarkable ability to interpret complex philosophical works by developing their explicit and implicit educational concepts. Walter Benjamin’s Antifascist Education is no exception. In this fine book, Lewis seeks to provide an ‘educational response to the manipulativeness, coldness, and hardness’ of growing authoritarianism in education (p. 16). He is ambitious, considering the book to be part of a broader effort to liberate teaching from its oppressed state in neoliberal or, as he suggests, ‘neofascist’ society. The book offers novel approaches to two crucial educational questions: (1) What forms of education cultivate the free expression of potentialities? and (2) How might Benjamin help us challenge common, problematic binaries, for example, knowledge– truth, immanence–transcendence, and means–ends, in educational theory and practice? Often Lewis’s writing is evocative, inspiring, even poetic: ‘The wave of education swells through learning into the crash of teaching, which sends the wave outward in a million directions’ (p. 37). At times, his writing also can be seemingly abstruse, such as when he suggests that ‘Benjamin’s educational forms induce awakenings that are indeterminate swellings within what is while extending what is to its extreme point where it touches its own potentiality for transformation (its capacity to become different by touching difference)’ (p. 208). While the book addresses each of this statement’s concepts, readers less familiar with the philosophical discourse which it invokes may be challenged to parse and explicate the relationships among ‘awakening’, ‘indeterminacy’, ‘swelling’, ‘touching potentiality’, ‘transformation’, and ‘difference’. Lewis does not hesitate to use the extreme terms, ‘fascist’ and ‘neofascist’, in characterizing prevalent neoliberal practices and policies and growing right-wing sociocultural and political dispositions. Writing his book in the midst of the right-wing fanaticism being exposed and incited during the Trump presidency, Lewis alerts us to growing parallels between mid-twentieth-century European fascist ideologies and current authoritarian approaches to educational policy and practice. At times, however, Lewis appears to treat the term ‘fascism’ as similar to, or closely analogous to, other movements and socioeconomic forms such as right-wing fanaticism, liberalism, neoliberalism, and 1060211 TRE0010.1177/14778785211060211Theory and Research in EducationBook reviews book-review2021","PeriodicalId":46679,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Research in Education","volume":"19 1","pages":"320 - 322"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book review: Tyson Lewis, Walter Benjamin’s Antifascist Education: From Riddles to Radio\",\"authors\":\"Harvey D. Shapiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14778785211060211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tyson Lewis has a remarkable ability to interpret complex philosophical works by developing their explicit and implicit educational concepts. Walter Benjamin’s Antifascist Education is no exception. In this fine book, Lewis seeks to provide an ‘educational response to the manipulativeness, coldness, and hardness’ of growing authoritarianism in education (p. 16). He is ambitious, considering the book to be part of a broader effort to liberate teaching from its oppressed state in neoliberal or, as he suggests, ‘neofascist’ society. The book offers novel approaches to two crucial educational questions: (1) What forms of education cultivate the free expression of potentialities? and (2) How might Benjamin help us challenge common, problematic binaries, for example, knowledge– truth, immanence–transcendence, and means–ends, in educational theory and practice? Often Lewis’s writing is evocative, inspiring, even poetic: ‘The wave of education swells through learning into the crash of teaching, which sends the wave outward in a million directions’ (p. 37). At times, his writing also can be seemingly abstruse, such as when he suggests that ‘Benjamin’s educational forms induce awakenings that are indeterminate swellings within what is while extending what is to its extreme point where it touches its own potentiality for transformation (its capacity to become different by touching difference)’ (p. 208). While the book addresses each of this statement’s concepts, readers less familiar with the philosophical discourse which it invokes may be challenged to parse and explicate the relationships among ‘awakening’, ‘indeterminacy’, ‘swelling’, ‘touching potentiality’, ‘transformation’, and ‘difference’. Lewis does not hesitate to use the extreme terms, ‘fascist’ and ‘neofascist’, in characterizing prevalent neoliberal practices and policies and growing right-wing sociocultural and political dispositions. Writing his book in the midst of the right-wing fanaticism being exposed and incited during the Trump presidency, Lewis alerts us to growing parallels between mid-twentieth-century European fascist ideologies and current authoritarian approaches to educational policy and practice. At times, however, Lewis appears to treat the term ‘fascism’ as similar to, or closely analogous to, other movements and socioeconomic forms such as right-wing fanaticism, liberalism, neoliberalism, and 1060211 TRE0010.1177/14778785211060211Theory and Research in EducationBook reviews book-review2021\",\"PeriodicalId\":46679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory and Research in Education\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"320 - 322\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory and Research in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14778785211060211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14778785211060211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

泰森·刘易斯在解读复杂的哲学著作时,表现出了显式和隐式的教育理念。本雅明的反法西斯教育也不例外。在这本优秀的书中,刘易斯试图对教育中日益增长的威权主义的“操纵、冷漠和冷酷”提供一种“教育回应”(第16页)。他雄心勃勃,认为这本书是将教育从新自由主义或如他所说的“新法西斯主义”社会的压迫中解放出来的更广泛努力的一部分。这本书为两个关键的教育问题提供了新颖的方法:(1)什么样的教育形式能培养潜能的自由表达?(2)本雅明如何帮助我们挑战教育理论和实践中常见的、有问题的二元对立,例如,知识-真理、内在-超越、手段-目的?刘易斯的作品常常唤起人们的共鸣,鼓舞人心,甚至充满诗意:“教育的浪潮从学习中膨胀到教学的崩溃中,教学的崩溃将浪潮向四面八方传播”(第37页)。有时,他的写作也可能看似深奥,比如当他提出“本雅明的教育形式诱导了觉醒,这种觉醒是不确定的膨胀,同时将存在延伸到它的极端点,在那里它触及了自己的转化潜力(通过触及差异而变得不同的能力)”(第208页)。虽然书中提到了这句话的每一个概念,但不太熟悉它所引用的哲学话语的读者可能会面临分析和解释“觉醒”、“不确定性”、“膨胀”、“触摸潜力”、“转变”和“差异”之间关系的挑战。刘易斯毫不犹豫地使用“法西斯主义”和“新法西斯主义”等极端术语来描述流行的新自由主义实践和政策,以及日益增长的右翼社会文化和政治倾向。在特朗普担任总统期间,右翼狂热主义被暴露和煽动,刘易斯在写这本书时提醒我们,20世纪中期的欧洲法西斯意识形态与当前教育政策和实践的威权主义方法之间的相似之处越来越多。然而,有时,刘易斯似乎将“法西斯主义”一词与其他运动和社会经济形式(如右翼狂热主义、自由主义、新自由主义和教育理论与研究)相似或非常相似
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Book review: Tyson Lewis, Walter Benjamin’s Antifascist Education: From Riddles to Radio
Tyson Lewis has a remarkable ability to interpret complex philosophical works by developing their explicit and implicit educational concepts. Walter Benjamin’s Antifascist Education is no exception. In this fine book, Lewis seeks to provide an ‘educational response to the manipulativeness, coldness, and hardness’ of growing authoritarianism in education (p. 16). He is ambitious, considering the book to be part of a broader effort to liberate teaching from its oppressed state in neoliberal or, as he suggests, ‘neofascist’ society. The book offers novel approaches to two crucial educational questions: (1) What forms of education cultivate the free expression of potentialities? and (2) How might Benjamin help us challenge common, problematic binaries, for example, knowledge– truth, immanence–transcendence, and means–ends, in educational theory and practice? Often Lewis’s writing is evocative, inspiring, even poetic: ‘The wave of education swells through learning into the crash of teaching, which sends the wave outward in a million directions’ (p. 37). At times, his writing also can be seemingly abstruse, such as when he suggests that ‘Benjamin’s educational forms induce awakenings that are indeterminate swellings within what is while extending what is to its extreme point where it touches its own potentiality for transformation (its capacity to become different by touching difference)’ (p. 208). While the book addresses each of this statement’s concepts, readers less familiar with the philosophical discourse which it invokes may be challenged to parse and explicate the relationships among ‘awakening’, ‘indeterminacy’, ‘swelling’, ‘touching potentiality’, ‘transformation’, and ‘difference’. Lewis does not hesitate to use the extreme terms, ‘fascist’ and ‘neofascist’, in characterizing prevalent neoliberal practices and policies and growing right-wing sociocultural and political dispositions. Writing his book in the midst of the right-wing fanaticism being exposed and incited during the Trump presidency, Lewis alerts us to growing parallels between mid-twentieth-century European fascist ideologies and current authoritarian approaches to educational policy and practice. At times, however, Lewis appears to treat the term ‘fascism’ as similar to, or closely analogous to, other movements and socioeconomic forms such as right-wing fanaticism, liberalism, neoliberalism, and 1060211 TRE0010.1177/14778785211060211Theory and Research in EducationBook reviews book-review2021
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Theory and Research in Education
Theory and Research in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Theory and Research in Education, formerly known as The School Field, is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes theoretical, empirical and conjectural papers contributing to the development of educational theory, policy and practice.
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Julian Culp, Johannes Drerup and Douglas Yacek (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Democratic Education Education for deliberative democracy through the long-term view Education for flourishing: A social contract for foundational competencies Book review: Barbara S Stengel, Responsibility: Philosophy of Education in Practice How much is too much? Refining normative evaluations of prescriptive curriculum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1