利用经济相互依赖、基于主体和贝叶斯模型评估内河航道破坏的综合方法

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q4 BUSINESS Engineering Economist Pub Date : 2022-11-16 DOI:10.1080/0013791X.2022.2139029
Paul M. Johnson, H. Baroud, C. Philip, M. Abkowitz
{"title":"利用经济相互依赖、基于主体和贝叶斯模型评估内河航道破坏的综合方法","authors":"Paul M. Johnson, H. Baroud, C. Philip, M. Abkowitz","doi":"10.1080/0013791X.2022.2139029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The U.S. inland waterways play a vital role in the domestic economy, but extreme weather events, especially floods, perennially threaten to disrupt their operations. Here, we develop a data-driven approach to analyzing economic risks due to flood closures along the inland waterways that combines agent-based, economic interdependence, and Bayesian modeling. We demonstrate our framework by evaluating economic impacts of various flood disruptions along the Upper Mississippi River and determining cases where a publicly operated, flood-resilient port located near the mouth of the river can reroute shipments and mitigate production losses for the region. We find that Illinois, Louisiana, Minnesota, and Missouri are the states that suffer the most production losses from flood disruptions and that agriculture and chemical manufacturing are the most impacted industries. However, during floods whose return periods exceed 30-years, the flood resilient port becomes cost-effective in mitigating losses for the region. Our methodology can be easily extended to other hazards and sections of the inland waterways.","PeriodicalId":49210,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Economist","volume":"68 1","pages":"2 - 19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An integrated approach to evaluating inland waterway disruptions using economic interdependence, agent-based, and Bayesian models\",\"authors\":\"Paul M. Johnson, H. Baroud, C. Philip, M. Abkowitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0013791X.2022.2139029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The U.S. inland waterways play a vital role in the domestic economy, but extreme weather events, especially floods, perennially threaten to disrupt their operations. Here, we develop a data-driven approach to analyzing economic risks due to flood closures along the inland waterways that combines agent-based, economic interdependence, and Bayesian modeling. We demonstrate our framework by evaluating economic impacts of various flood disruptions along the Upper Mississippi River and determining cases where a publicly operated, flood-resilient port located near the mouth of the river can reroute shipments and mitigate production losses for the region. We find that Illinois, Louisiana, Minnesota, and Missouri are the states that suffer the most production losses from flood disruptions and that agriculture and chemical manufacturing are the most impacted industries. However, during floods whose return periods exceed 30-years, the flood resilient port becomes cost-effective in mitigating losses for the region. Our methodology can be easily extended to other hazards and sections of the inland waterways.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Economist\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"2 - 19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Economist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2022.2139029\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Economist","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2022.2139029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:美国内河航道在国内经济中发挥着至关重要的作用,但极端天气事件,特别是洪水,不断威胁着它们的运行。在这里,我们开发了一种数据驱动的方法来分析内陆水道洪水关闭造成的经济风险,该方法结合了基于代理的、经济相互依存的和贝叶斯模型。我们通过评估密西西比河上游各种洪水破坏的经济影响来展示我们的框架,并确定位于河口附近的公共运营,抗洪港口可以改变运输路线并减轻该地区的生产损失的案例。我们发现,伊利诺伊州、路易斯安那州、明尼苏达州和密苏里州是受洪水破坏影响最大的州,农业和化学制造业是受影响最大的行业。然而,在汛期超过30年的洪水期间,抗洪港口在减轻该地区损失方面具有成本效益。我们的方法可以很容易地扩展到其他危险和内陆水道的部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An integrated approach to evaluating inland waterway disruptions using economic interdependence, agent-based, and Bayesian models
Abstract The U.S. inland waterways play a vital role in the domestic economy, but extreme weather events, especially floods, perennially threaten to disrupt their operations. Here, we develop a data-driven approach to analyzing economic risks due to flood closures along the inland waterways that combines agent-based, economic interdependence, and Bayesian modeling. We demonstrate our framework by evaluating economic impacts of various flood disruptions along the Upper Mississippi River and determining cases where a publicly operated, flood-resilient port located near the mouth of the river can reroute shipments and mitigate production losses for the region. We find that Illinois, Louisiana, Minnesota, and Missouri are the states that suffer the most production losses from flood disruptions and that agriculture and chemical manufacturing are the most impacted industries. However, during floods whose return periods exceed 30-years, the flood resilient port becomes cost-effective in mitigating losses for the region. Our methodology can be easily extended to other hazards and sections of the inland waterways.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Economist
Engineering Economist ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL-OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Engineering Economist is a refereed journal published jointly by the Engineering Economy Division of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) and the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE). The journal publishes articles, case studies, surveys, and book and software reviews that represent original research, current practice, and teaching involving problems of capital investment. The journal seeks submissions in a number of areas, including, but not limited to: capital investment analysis, financial risk management, cost estimation and accounting, cost of capital, design economics, economic decision analysis, engineering economy education, research and development, and the analysis of public policy when it is relevant to the economic investment decisions made by engineers and technology managers.
期刊最新文献
Introducing a real option framework for EVA/MVA analysis Avoiding momentum crashes using stochastic mean-CVaR optimization with time-varying risk aversion The S curve: A dynamic view of in ERP evaluation Optimization-based tail risk hedging of the S&P 500 index Letter from the editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1