引言:讨论中的美好、真实与美好——有意义的生活

Q3 Arts and Humanities Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.22613/ZFPP/5.2.2
Michael Kühler, Sebastian Muders, Markus Rüthers
{"title":"引言:讨论中的美好、真实与美好——有意义的生活","authors":"Michael Kühler, Sebastian Muders, Markus Rüthers","doi":"10.22613/ZFPP/5.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The category of meaning or meaningfulness recently has received widespread attention within the debate on the good life. Indeed, many authors suppose that any comprehensive normative theory of the good life needs to include an account of the meaningful life, understood as one of its particular value dimensions. Usually, this syntagma is understood in terms of referring to a certain valuable aspect of a 42 Einleitung: Das Schöne, Wahre und Gute given life or one of its temporal parts, labelled as praiseworthy, significant, or admirable. Controversy abounds, however, when it comes to questions such as whether the meaningful life constitutes an independent value category within the good life, or, if so, how this category relates to the other, more established categories of the good life like human well-being. The articles collected in this special issue attempt to contribute to the controversies on the understanding of the multi-layered dimension of the meaningful life and try to shed further light on it.","PeriodicalId":53352,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Einleitung: Das Schöne, Wahre und Gute – Das sinnvolle Leben in der Diskussion\",\"authors\":\"Michael Kühler, Sebastian Muders, Markus Rüthers\",\"doi\":\"10.22613/ZFPP/5.2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The category of meaning or meaningfulness recently has received widespread attention within the debate on the good life. Indeed, many authors suppose that any comprehensive normative theory of the good life needs to include an account of the meaningful life, understood as one of its particular value dimensions. Usually, this syntagma is understood in terms of referring to a certain valuable aspect of a 42 Einleitung: Das Schöne, Wahre und Gute given life or one of its temporal parts, labelled as praiseworthy, significant, or admirable. Controversy abounds, however, when it comes to questions such as whether the meaningful life constitutes an independent value category within the good life, or, if so, how this category relates to the other, more established categories of the good life like human well-being. The articles collected in this special issue attempt to contribute to the controversies on the understanding of the multi-layered dimension of the meaningful life and try to shed further light on it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22613/ZFPP/5.2.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22613/ZFPP/5.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,在关于美好生活的争论中,意义或有意义的范畴受到了广泛关注。事实上,许多作者认为,任何关于美好生活的全面规范理论都需要包括对有意义生活的描述,并将其理解为其特定的价值维度之一。通常,这个语法被理解为指的是一个42的有价值的方面:Das Schöne, Wahre und Gute被赋予生命或其时间部分之一,被标记为值得赞扬的,重要的,或令人钦佩的。然而,当涉及到诸如有意义的生活是否在美好生活中构成一个独立的价值类别,或者,如果是,这个类别如何与其他更成熟的美好生活类别(如人类福祉)相关联等问题时,争议就很多了。这期特刊所收录的文章,试图对有意义人生的多层维度的理解上的争议有所贡献,并试图进一步阐明这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Einleitung: Das Schöne, Wahre und Gute – Das sinnvolle Leben in der Diskussion
The category of meaning or meaningfulness recently has received widespread attention within the debate on the good life. Indeed, many authors suppose that any comprehensive normative theory of the good life needs to include an account of the meaningful life, understood as one of its particular value dimensions. Usually, this syntagma is understood in terms of referring to a certain valuable aspect of a 42 Einleitung: Das Schöne, Wahre und Gute given life or one of its temporal parts, labelled as praiseworthy, significant, or admirable. Controversy abounds, however, when it comes to questions such as whether the meaningful life constitutes an independent value category within the good life, or, if so, how this category relates to the other, more established categories of the good life like human well-being. The articles collected in this special issue attempt to contribute to the controversies on the understanding of the multi-layered dimension of the meaningful life and try to shed further light on it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie
Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Dekoloniale Ethik und die Grenzen der Redefreiheit Gegenrede Verschwörungserzählungen im Kontext der Wissenschaftsleugnung Frei reden dürfen, aber es doch nicht sollen? Redefreiheit als Befähigung zur öffentlichen Rede
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1