音乐文化符号学中原型的转换:从原型原型到概念和元概念

Мaryna Severynova
{"title":"音乐文化符号学中原型的转换:从原型原型到概念和元概念","authors":"Мaryna Severynova","doi":"10.31500/2309-8813.18.2022.273811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A scientific problem. The article examines the musical and cultural aspects of the «archetype» phenomenon and its transformation from an archetypal prototype through an artistic image to the concept and metaconcept in musical culture. Regardless of the relevance of these phenomena in the modern space of culture, this problem remains little researched, although it is still connected with the urgent issues of finding the primary foundations, the primary sources of being, the identification of universal patterns-models in the composer’s creative work.\nThe aim. To investigate the transformation of the archetype in the semiosis of musical culture and to reveal the genealogical interdependence of the transition of the archetype into the concept and metaconcept.\nThe methodology is based on scientific cultural, psychological, literary and musicological investigations, as well as a systematic approach, comparative and logical-analytical methods. With the help of this methodology, the transformation of the archetype, their interdependence in musical culture was revealed.\nResults. The definitions of «archetype» and «concept» are considered, their common and distinctive features are clarified, and the transformation of archetypes into concepts is traced. In this context, it was noted that entering the world of everyday ideas, the archetypal prototype is filled with new emotional and informational content; it acquires a personal, socially conditioned specificity and moves into the realm of concepts. The interpretation of the definition «concept» as coexistence by J. Deleuze and F. Guattari is analyzed. The concept is considered in the context of perspectives of frame semantics in music.\nConclusions. As a result of the research, a genealogical connection between two definitions «archetype» and «concept» was noted. It was found that a concept is not an image, not every artistic image can become a concept, since the concept potentially carries an invariant content in the form of an archetype, which is individually and creatively realized in each specific case of a composer’s creative work. It was determined that archetypes and concepts perform the function of memory (cultural, social, national), form the continuity, integrity of being, its value-meaning core. It was proven that archetypes of the cultural unconscious are metaconcepts of culture: both archetypes and concepts form a certain «metalanguage of culture» (Y. Lotman), or an «overlanguage». It was found that archetypal prototypes are, in their essence, archetypal semes, which go from the collective unconscious to the subconscious of a modern person, and their reactualization takes place. Archetypal semes (units of the universal subject code — sound, tone, rhythm, intonation, etc.) form the figurative sphere of the concept. It was determined that the concept in musical creativity expands the semantic and emotional-sensual possibilities and meaning of the archetypal prototype; it carries out an intermediary function in the transmission of sociocultural experience; it forms the communicative space of culture. The important essence of concepts is noted the formation of potential meanings, which the concept contains not in the text itself, but in contexts, «on the border of statements».","PeriodicalId":34369,"journal":{"name":"Suchasne mistetstvo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The transformation of the archetype in the semiosis of musical culture: from the archetypal prototype to the concept and metaconcept\",\"authors\":\"Мaryna Severynova\",\"doi\":\"10.31500/2309-8813.18.2022.273811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A scientific problem. The article examines the musical and cultural aspects of the «archetype» phenomenon and its transformation from an archetypal prototype through an artistic image to the concept and metaconcept in musical culture. Regardless of the relevance of these phenomena in the modern space of culture, this problem remains little researched, although it is still connected with the urgent issues of finding the primary foundations, the primary sources of being, the identification of universal patterns-models in the composer’s creative work.\\nThe aim. To investigate the transformation of the archetype in the semiosis of musical culture and to reveal the genealogical interdependence of the transition of the archetype into the concept and metaconcept.\\nThe methodology is based on scientific cultural, psychological, literary and musicological investigations, as well as a systematic approach, comparative and logical-analytical methods. With the help of this methodology, the transformation of the archetype, their interdependence in musical culture was revealed.\\nResults. The definitions of «archetype» and «concept» are considered, their common and distinctive features are clarified, and the transformation of archetypes into concepts is traced. In this context, it was noted that entering the world of everyday ideas, the archetypal prototype is filled with new emotional and informational content; it acquires a personal, socially conditioned specificity and moves into the realm of concepts. The interpretation of the definition «concept» as coexistence by J. Deleuze and F. Guattari is analyzed. The concept is considered in the context of perspectives of frame semantics in music.\\nConclusions. As a result of the research, a genealogical connection between two definitions «archetype» and «concept» was noted. It was found that a concept is not an image, not every artistic image can become a concept, since the concept potentially carries an invariant content in the form of an archetype, which is individually and creatively realized in each specific case of a composer’s creative work. It was determined that archetypes and concepts perform the function of memory (cultural, social, national), form the continuity, integrity of being, its value-meaning core. It was proven that archetypes of the cultural unconscious are metaconcepts of culture: both archetypes and concepts form a certain «metalanguage of culture» (Y. Lotman), or an «overlanguage». It was found that archetypal prototypes are, in their essence, archetypal semes, which go from the collective unconscious to the subconscious of a modern person, and their reactualization takes place. Archetypal semes (units of the universal subject code — sound, tone, rhythm, intonation, etc.) form the figurative sphere of the concept. It was determined that the concept in musical creativity expands the semantic and emotional-sensual possibilities and meaning of the archetypal prototype; it carries out an intermediary function in the transmission of sociocultural experience; it forms the communicative space of culture. The important essence of concepts is noted the formation of potential meanings, which the concept contains not in the text itself, but in contexts, «on the border of statements».\",\"PeriodicalId\":34369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Suchasne mistetstvo\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Suchasne mistetstvo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31500/2309-8813.18.2022.273811\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suchasne mistetstvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31500/2309-8813.18.2022.273811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个科学问题。本文考察了“原型”现象的音乐和文化方面,以及它从一个通过艺术形象的原型到音乐文化中的概念和元概念的转变。不管这些现象在现代文化空间中的相关性如何,这个问题仍然很少被研究,尽管它仍然与寻找作曲家创作作品中的主要基础、存在的主要来源、普遍模式模式的识别等紧迫问题有关。目标。探讨音乐文化符号化过程中原型的转换,揭示原型向概念和元概念转换的谱系依赖关系。该方法基于科学的文化、心理学、文学和音乐学调查,以及系统的方法、比较和逻辑分析方法。在这种方法论的帮助下,原型的转换,它们在音乐文化中的相互依存关系得以揭示。后果对“原型”和“概念”的定义进行了思考,阐明了它们的共同和独特特征,并追溯了原型向概念的转变。在这种背景下,人们注意到,进入日常思想的世界,原型原型充满了新的情感和信息内容;它获得了个人的、社会条件下的特殊性,并进入了概念的领域。分析了德勒兹和瓜塔里对共存概念的解释。这个概念是在音乐框架语义的背景下考虑的。结论。研究结果表明,“原型”和“概念”这两个定义之间存在谱系联系。研究发现,一个概念不是一个图像,也不是每一个艺术图像都能成为一个概念,因为这个概念可能以原型的形式携带着不变的内容,而原型在作曲家创作作品的每一个具体案例中都是单独和创造性地实现的。原型和概念具有记忆功能(文化、社会、民族),形成存在的连续性、完整性及其价值意义核心。事实证明,文化无意识的原型是文化的元概念:原型和概念都形成了某种“文化的元语言”(Y.Lotman),或“超语言”。研究发现,原型在本质上是原型义位,它从现代人的集体无意识到潜意识,并发生了它们的再认识。原型义位(通用主题代码的单位——声音、音调、节奏、语调等)构成了概念的具象范围。音乐创作中的概念拓展了原型的语义和情感感官可能性及意义;它在社会文化经验的传递中起着中介作用;它构成了文化的交际空间。概念的重要本质是潜在意义的形成,概念不包含在文本本身中,而是包含在上下文中,“在陈述的边界上”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The transformation of the archetype in the semiosis of musical culture: from the archetypal prototype to the concept and metaconcept
A scientific problem. The article examines the musical and cultural aspects of the «archetype» phenomenon and its transformation from an archetypal prototype through an artistic image to the concept and metaconcept in musical culture. Regardless of the relevance of these phenomena in the modern space of culture, this problem remains little researched, although it is still connected with the urgent issues of finding the primary foundations, the primary sources of being, the identification of universal patterns-models in the composer’s creative work. The aim. To investigate the transformation of the archetype in the semiosis of musical culture and to reveal the genealogical interdependence of the transition of the archetype into the concept and metaconcept. The methodology is based on scientific cultural, psychological, literary and musicological investigations, as well as a systematic approach, comparative and logical-analytical methods. With the help of this methodology, the transformation of the archetype, their interdependence in musical culture was revealed. Results. The definitions of «archetype» and «concept» are considered, their common and distinctive features are clarified, and the transformation of archetypes into concepts is traced. In this context, it was noted that entering the world of everyday ideas, the archetypal prototype is filled with new emotional and informational content; it acquires a personal, socially conditioned specificity and moves into the realm of concepts. The interpretation of the definition «concept» as coexistence by J. Deleuze and F. Guattari is analyzed. The concept is considered in the context of perspectives of frame semantics in music. Conclusions. As a result of the research, a genealogical connection between two definitions «archetype» and «concept» was noted. It was found that a concept is not an image, not every artistic image can become a concept, since the concept potentially carries an invariant content in the form of an archetype, which is individually and creatively realized in each specific case of a composer’s creative work. It was determined that archetypes and concepts perform the function of memory (cultural, social, national), form the continuity, integrity of being, its value-meaning core. It was proven that archetypes of the cultural unconscious are metaconcepts of culture: both archetypes and concepts form a certain «metalanguage of culture» (Y. Lotman), or an «overlanguage». It was found that archetypal prototypes are, in their essence, archetypal semes, which go from the collective unconscious to the subconscious of a modern person, and their reactualization takes place. Archetypal semes (units of the universal subject code — sound, tone, rhythm, intonation, etc.) form the figurative sphere of the concept. It was determined that the concept in musical creativity expands the semantic and emotional-sensual possibilities and meaning of the archetypal prototype; it carries out an intermediary function in the transmission of sociocultural experience; it forms the communicative space of culture. The important essence of concepts is noted the formation of potential meanings, which the concept contains not in the text itself, but in contexts, «on the border of statements».
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mythopoetics of Borys Liatoshynsky’s 1910–1930s: the wagnerian context Discourse “academic — experimental”: theory and practice On the issue of organizing and holding music festivals Borys Liatoshynskyi and the artists of Lviv: epistolary notes to the biography of the artist Ukraine’s civilizational offer to the world. Ideas of the noosphere and cosmic worldview in Ukrainian art of the XX–XXI centuries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1