透视战略计划:土耳其高等教育机构的优势与劣势

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Qualitative Research in Education Pub Date : 2020-02-28 DOI:10.17583/qre.2020.4111
Abdullah Selvitopu, Metin Kaya
{"title":"透视战略计划:土耳其高等教育机构的优势与劣势","authors":"Abdullah Selvitopu, Metin Kaya","doi":"10.17583/qre.2020.4111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As strengths and weaknesses are regarded as internal features of an organization, the present study focused on strengths and weaknesses of Turkish public universities by analyzing the SWOTs (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) of twenty higher education institutions. By applying qualitative content analytical tools, we tried to make some comparisons, twenty universities, ten ranked at the top and ten at the bottom of the URAP list, were chosen to analyze the strengths and weaknesses. Findings show that all universities top or bottom ones have internal strengths and weaknesses on their own. The strengths of universities differ according to their size, field of service, structure, history and geographical locations. Top universities which are in big size, have a deeply rooted history and situated in a better geographical location can enjoy the strengths as qualified faculty members, organizational culture, internationalization process, infrastructure and good alumni relations. On the other hand, bottom universities which have not got those advantages deal with other strengths such as young faculty members, organizational support and internal communication. As for the weaknesses, top universities need more budget and acceptable rate of faculty member and student. Bottom ones need more qualified faculty members, students and staff. As they are located in disadvantageous regions, they are in need of some promotions to attract faculties, staff, national and international students. In addition, they also should be aware of the contributions of good alumni relations.","PeriodicalId":42606,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Looking Inside the Strategic Plans: Strengths and Weaknesses of Turkish Higher Education Institutions\",\"authors\":\"Abdullah Selvitopu, Metin Kaya\",\"doi\":\"10.17583/qre.2020.4111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As strengths and weaknesses are regarded as internal features of an organization, the present study focused on strengths and weaknesses of Turkish public universities by analyzing the SWOTs (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) of twenty higher education institutions. By applying qualitative content analytical tools, we tried to make some comparisons, twenty universities, ten ranked at the top and ten at the bottom of the URAP list, were chosen to analyze the strengths and weaknesses. Findings show that all universities top or bottom ones have internal strengths and weaknesses on their own. The strengths of universities differ according to their size, field of service, structure, history and geographical locations. Top universities which are in big size, have a deeply rooted history and situated in a better geographical location can enjoy the strengths as qualified faculty members, organizational culture, internationalization process, infrastructure and good alumni relations. On the other hand, bottom universities which have not got those advantages deal with other strengths such as young faculty members, organizational support and internal communication. As for the weaknesses, top universities need more budget and acceptable rate of faculty member and student. Bottom ones need more qualified faculty members, students and staff. As they are located in disadvantageous regions, they are in need of some promotions to attract faculties, staff, national and international students. In addition, they also should be aware of the contributions of good alumni relations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qualitative Research in Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qualitative Research in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.2020.4111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.2020.4111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于优势和劣势被视为组织的内部特征,本研究通过分析20所高等教育机构的swot(优势、劣势、机会、威胁),重点关注土耳其公立大学的优势和劣势。通过应用定性内容分析工具,我们试图进行一些比较,选择了20所大学,其中10所在URAP列表中排名靠前,10所排名靠后,分析其优势和劣势。调查结果表明,所有大学的排名靠前或靠后都有自身的内在优势和劣势。大学的优势因其规模、服务领域、结构、历史和地理位置而异。规模大、历史深厚、地理位置优越的名校,在师资力量、组织文化、国际化进程、基础设施、校友关系等方面都具有优势。另一方面,没有这些优势的底层大学在年轻的教师、组织支持和内部沟通等方面也有优势。至于缺点,顶尖大学需要更多的预算和可接受的教师和学生率。排名靠后的学校需要更多合格的教师、学生和员工。由于它们位于不利的地区,它们需要一些促销活动来吸引教师、员工、国内和国际学生。此外,他们也应该意识到良好校友关系的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Looking Inside the Strategic Plans: Strengths and Weaknesses of Turkish Higher Education Institutions
As strengths and weaknesses are regarded as internal features of an organization, the present study focused on strengths and weaknesses of Turkish public universities by analyzing the SWOTs (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) of twenty higher education institutions. By applying qualitative content analytical tools, we tried to make some comparisons, twenty universities, ten ranked at the top and ten at the bottom of the URAP list, were chosen to analyze the strengths and weaknesses. Findings show that all universities top or bottom ones have internal strengths and weaknesses on their own. The strengths of universities differ according to their size, field of service, structure, history and geographical locations. Top universities which are in big size, have a deeply rooted history and situated in a better geographical location can enjoy the strengths as qualified faculty members, organizational culture, internationalization process, infrastructure and good alumni relations. On the other hand, bottom universities which have not got those advantages deal with other strengths such as young faculty members, organizational support and internal communication. As for the weaknesses, top universities need more budget and acceptable rate of faculty member and student. Bottom ones need more qualified faculty members, students and staff. As they are located in disadvantageous regions, they are in need of some promotions to attract faculties, staff, national and international students. In addition, they also should be aware of the contributions of good alumni relations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Qualitative Research in Education
Qualitative Research in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
4
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perspectives of Open Education High Students on the Open Learning Mode Exploring Writing Anxiety during Writing Process: An Analysis of Perceptions in Chinese English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Learners La Satisfacción Laboral de los y las Profesionales de Acogimiento Residencial Infantil y Juvenil: Una Mirada Europea The Construction of the Pedagogical Space from the Narratives of the Early Childhood Education Teachers Teachers’ Continuous Professional Development through Lesson Study: Voices of Vietnamese EFL Teachers at University
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1