组织实践社区的领导者:他们的特点、活动和与社区的契合度

IF 3.2 4区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Knowledge Management Research & Practice Pub Date : 2022-09-08 DOI:10.1080/14778238.2022.2120837
Jean-Philippe Bootz, Stefano Borzillo, S. Raub
{"title":"组织实践社区的领导者:他们的特点、活动和与社区的契合度","authors":"Jean-Philippe Bootz, Stefano Borzillo, S. Raub","doi":"10.1080/14778238.2022.2120837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT By balancing the needs for autonomy and control, leaders of organisational communities of practice (OCoPs) play a central role in their effectiveness. This study aims to identify different OCoP leader profiles and analyse possible contingencies with various OCoP types. Using a qualitative methodology on a sample of 16 OCoPs from nine international organisations, an inductive analysis was undertaken by using Gioia et al.’s (2013) data structures model. Results reveal three distinct OCoP leader profiles, labelled “centripetal”, “centrifugal” and “balanced”. A comparison of different OCoP types reveals a fit between centripetal OCoP leaders and operational exploitation OCoPs, centrifugal OCoP leaders and strategic exploration OCoPs, and, finally, balanced OCoP leaders and hybrid OCoPs. These results enrich previous research on OCoP types, by identifying a “hybrid” combination of the two, proposing a novel framework of different OCoP leader profiles and highlighting a new contingency perspective on the relationships between OCoP leader profiles and OCoP types.","PeriodicalId":51497,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Management Research & Practice","volume":"21 1","pages":"972 - 982"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leaders of organisational communities of practice: their characteristics, activities, and fit with their communities\",\"authors\":\"Jean-Philippe Bootz, Stefano Borzillo, S. Raub\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14778238.2022.2120837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT By balancing the needs for autonomy and control, leaders of organisational communities of practice (OCoPs) play a central role in their effectiveness. This study aims to identify different OCoP leader profiles and analyse possible contingencies with various OCoP types. Using a qualitative methodology on a sample of 16 OCoPs from nine international organisations, an inductive analysis was undertaken by using Gioia et al.’s (2013) data structures model. Results reveal three distinct OCoP leader profiles, labelled “centripetal”, “centrifugal” and “balanced”. A comparison of different OCoP types reveals a fit between centripetal OCoP leaders and operational exploitation OCoPs, centrifugal OCoP leaders and strategic exploration OCoPs, and, finally, balanced OCoP leaders and hybrid OCoPs. These results enrich previous research on OCoP types, by identifying a “hybrid” combination of the two, proposing a novel framework of different OCoP leader profiles and highlighting a new contingency perspective on the relationships between OCoP leader profiles and OCoP types.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knowledge Management Research & Practice\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"972 - 982\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knowledge Management Research & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2022.2120837\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Management Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2022.2120837","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要通过平衡自主和控制的需求,组织实践社区(OCoPs)的领导者在其有效性中发挥着核心作用。本研究旨在确定不同的OCoP领导者概况,并分析各种OCoP类型的可能意外事件。使用定性方法对来自9个国际组织的16个OCoP样本进行归纳分析,使用Gioia等人(2013)的数据结构模型。结果显示了三种不同的OCoP领导者特征,分别标记为“向心”、“离心”和“平衡”。对不同OCoP类型的比较揭示了向心型OCoP领导者与作战开发型OCoPs、离心型OCoPo领导者与战略探索型OCoPs之间的匹配,最后是平衡型OCoP领导者和混合型OCoP。这些结果丰富了以往对OCoP类型的研究,确定了两者的“混合”组合,提出了不同OCoP领导者概况的新框架,并强调了OCoP领导人概况与OCoP类别之间关系的新偶然性视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Leaders of organisational communities of practice: their characteristics, activities, and fit with their communities
ABSTRACT By balancing the needs for autonomy and control, leaders of organisational communities of practice (OCoPs) play a central role in their effectiveness. This study aims to identify different OCoP leader profiles and analyse possible contingencies with various OCoP types. Using a qualitative methodology on a sample of 16 OCoPs from nine international organisations, an inductive analysis was undertaken by using Gioia et al.’s (2013) data structures model. Results reveal three distinct OCoP leader profiles, labelled “centripetal”, “centrifugal” and “balanced”. A comparison of different OCoP types reveals a fit between centripetal OCoP leaders and operational exploitation OCoPs, centrifugal OCoP leaders and strategic exploration OCoPs, and, finally, balanced OCoP leaders and hybrid OCoPs. These results enrich previous research on OCoP types, by identifying a “hybrid” combination of the two, proposing a novel framework of different OCoP leader profiles and highlighting a new contingency perspective on the relationships between OCoP leader profiles and OCoP types.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
15.60%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Knowledge management is a term that has worked its way into the mainstream of both academic and business arenas since it was first coined in the 1980s. Interest has increased rapidly during the last decade and shows no signs of abating. The current state of the knowledge management field is that it encompasses four overlapping areas: •Managing knowledge (creating/acquiring, sharing, retaining, storing, using, updating, retiring) •Organisational learning •Intellectual capital •Knowledge economics Within (and across) these, knowledge management has to address issues relating to technology, people, culture and systems.
期刊最新文献
From authentic leadership to knowledge sharing and knowledge worker retention: mediating role of psychological empowerment Every coin has two sides: The application of artificial intelligence on employees’ unethical behaviours Sustainable leadership and knowledge ingredients - the recipe for sustainable competitive advantage: a mixed-method approach Relational social capital and tacit knowledge sharing: the mediation of P-O fit and POS Digital transformation through organisational unlearning: insights from practitioners’ voice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1