Raymond M. Lee , Boris Shoshitaishvili , Rachel L. Wood , Jeremy Bekker , Benjamin W. Abbott
{"title":"临界区的含义","authors":"Raymond M. Lee , Boris Shoshitaishvili , Rachel L. Wood , Jeremy Bekker , Benjamin W. Abbott","doi":"10.1016/j.ancene.2023.100377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The original meaning of the Critical Zone (CZ) was spatial and pointed to one physical referent: the terrestrial surface of the entire Earth. As usage increased among researchers in the geosciences, social sciences, and humanities, new meanings led to the concept pointing to different places and ideas. Emerging trends have expanded the CZ further: CZs are mapped in computational spacetime and on distant planets and asteroids. The polysemous character of the CZ can be confounding for a field-based science, but Earth scientists and technologists have collaborated to collect and harmonize Big Data sets into a sizable library of CZ research in a short time (around 20 years). In this review, we map the semantic range of the CZ and explore how CZ science has remained coherent even as researchers diversified the concept by developing distinguishable but loosely overlapping meanings. We organize extant meanings into three tiers: (1) Earth’s spatial interface of the geochemical and biological; (2) scientific knowledge of geophysical functionality of the CZ, as represented in an ever-growing library of data or by a single feature as proxy (e.g. soil); (3) a planetary home vulnerable to human disruption. In a time of immense human influence on the CZ, we underscore the latent meaning of planetary home, which marshals motivations of care and protection. These three tiers—the ontological, epistemic, and anthropocenic—build on each other to make the CZ a uniquely valuable concept for navigating the socio-ecological challenges of the Anthropocene.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56021,"journal":{"name":"Anthropocene","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100377"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The meanings of the Critical Zone\",\"authors\":\"Raymond M. Lee , Boris Shoshitaishvili , Rachel L. Wood , Jeremy Bekker , Benjamin W. Abbott\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ancene.2023.100377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The original meaning of the Critical Zone (CZ) was spatial and pointed to one physical referent: the terrestrial surface of the entire Earth. As usage increased among researchers in the geosciences, social sciences, and humanities, new meanings led to the concept pointing to different places and ideas. Emerging trends have expanded the CZ further: CZs are mapped in computational spacetime and on distant planets and asteroids. The polysemous character of the CZ can be confounding for a field-based science, but Earth scientists and technologists have collaborated to collect and harmonize Big Data sets into a sizable library of CZ research in a short time (around 20 years). In this review, we map the semantic range of the CZ and explore how CZ science has remained coherent even as researchers diversified the concept by developing distinguishable but loosely overlapping meanings. We organize extant meanings into three tiers: (1) Earth’s spatial interface of the geochemical and biological; (2) scientific knowledge of geophysical functionality of the CZ, as represented in an ever-growing library of data or by a single feature as proxy (e.g. soil); (3) a planetary home vulnerable to human disruption. In a time of immense human influence on the CZ, we underscore the latent meaning of planetary home, which marshals motivations of care and protection. These three tiers—the ontological, epistemic, and anthropocenic—build on each other to make the CZ a uniquely valuable concept for navigating the socio-ecological challenges of the Anthropocene.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropocene\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropocene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213305423000103\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropocene","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213305423000103","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The original meaning of the Critical Zone (CZ) was spatial and pointed to one physical referent: the terrestrial surface of the entire Earth. As usage increased among researchers in the geosciences, social sciences, and humanities, new meanings led to the concept pointing to different places and ideas. Emerging trends have expanded the CZ further: CZs are mapped in computational spacetime and on distant planets and asteroids. The polysemous character of the CZ can be confounding for a field-based science, but Earth scientists and technologists have collaborated to collect and harmonize Big Data sets into a sizable library of CZ research in a short time (around 20 years). In this review, we map the semantic range of the CZ and explore how CZ science has remained coherent even as researchers diversified the concept by developing distinguishable but loosely overlapping meanings. We organize extant meanings into three tiers: (1) Earth’s spatial interface of the geochemical and biological; (2) scientific knowledge of geophysical functionality of the CZ, as represented in an ever-growing library of data or by a single feature as proxy (e.g. soil); (3) a planetary home vulnerable to human disruption. In a time of immense human influence on the CZ, we underscore the latent meaning of planetary home, which marshals motivations of care and protection. These three tiers—the ontological, epistemic, and anthropocenic—build on each other to make the CZ a uniquely valuable concept for navigating the socio-ecological challenges of the Anthropocene.
AnthropoceneEarth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
102 days
期刊介绍:
Anthropocene is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes peer-reviewed works addressing the nature, scale, and extent of interactions that people have with Earth processes and systems. The scope of the journal includes the significance of human activities in altering Earth’s landscapes, oceans, the atmosphere, cryosphere, and ecosystems over a range of time and space scales - from global phenomena over geologic eras to single isolated events - including the linkages, couplings, and feedbacks among physical, chemical, and biological components of Earth systems. The journal also addresses how such alterations can have profound effects on, and implications for, human society. As the scale and pace of human interactions with Earth systems have intensified in recent decades, understanding human-induced alterations in the past and present is critical to our ability to anticipate, mitigate, and adapt to changes in the future. The journal aims to provide a venue to focus research findings, discussions, and debates toward advancing predictive understanding of human interactions with Earth systems - one of the grand challenges of our time.