幼儿教育环境中对儿童的种族偏见

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Early Childhood Research Pub Date : 2022-04-14 DOI:10.1177/1476718X221087051
Emma A Blackson, M. Gerdes, Ellie Segan, Crystal Anokam, Tiffani J. Johnson
{"title":"幼儿教育环境中对儿童的种族偏见","authors":"Emma A Blackson, M. Gerdes, Ellie Segan, Crystal Anokam, Tiffani J. Johnson","doi":"10.1177/1476718X221087051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Racial disparities in the education setting are well-documented, including suspensions and expulsion for Black children beginning in pre-school. Racial bias has been hypothesized as a factor contributing to these disparities. However, little is known about the racial attitudes that childcare educators and staff have toward children. To describe levels of implicit and explicit racial bias toward children among early childhood educators, we measured implicit pro-White/anti-Black racial bias of teachers and staff from three urban childcare centers using the Child Race Implicit Association Test (IAT). Explicit bias was measured using a racial preference scale. Of the 48 participants in this sample, 56% were White, 29% Black, and 10% Hispanic. Although 21% (n = 10) of participants had no racial bias on the Child Race IAT, most had implicit pro-White bias ranging from weak to strong (n = 29%and 60%). The remaining participants had implicit pro-Black bias ranging from weak to strong (n = 9%and 19%). In contrast, 95% of participants reported no having no explicit racial preferences toward White or Black children. Additionally, we asked participants about perceptions, knowledge, and beliefs about sources of early childhood disparities. Knowledge of bias can be used in developing strategies to mitigate bias and reduce disparities in childcare settings.","PeriodicalId":46652,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Childhood Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial bias toward children in the early childhood education setting\",\"authors\":\"Emma A Blackson, M. Gerdes, Ellie Segan, Crystal Anokam, Tiffani J. Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1476718X221087051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Racial disparities in the education setting are well-documented, including suspensions and expulsion for Black children beginning in pre-school. Racial bias has been hypothesized as a factor contributing to these disparities. However, little is known about the racial attitudes that childcare educators and staff have toward children. To describe levels of implicit and explicit racial bias toward children among early childhood educators, we measured implicit pro-White/anti-Black racial bias of teachers and staff from three urban childcare centers using the Child Race Implicit Association Test (IAT). Explicit bias was measured using a racial preference scale. Of the 48 participants in this sample, 56% were White, 29% Black, and 10% Hispanic. Although 21% (n = 10) of participants had no racial bias on the Child Race IAT, most had implicit pro-White bias ranging from weak to strong (n = 29%and 60%). The remaining participants had implicit pro-Black bias ranging from weak to strong (n = 9%and 19%). In contrast, 95% of participants reported no having no explicit racial preferences toward White or Black children. Additionally, we asked participants about perceptions, knowledge, and beliefs about sources of early childhood disparities. Knowledge of bias can be used in developing strategies to mitigate bias and reduce disparities in childcare settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Early Childhood Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Early Childhood Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X221087051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Early Childhood Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X221087051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

教育环境中的种族差异有据可查,包括从学前开始的黑人儿童被停职和开除。种族偏见被认为是造成这些差异的一个因素。然而,人们对儿童保育教育工作者和工作人员对儿童的种族态度知之甚少。为了描述幼儿教育工作者对儿童的内隐和外显种族偏见水平,我们使用儿童种族内隐关联测试(IAT)测量了三个城市儿童保育中心教师和工作人员的内隐亲白人/反黑人种族偏见。使用种族偏好量表测量显性偏见。在该样本的48名参与者中,56%是白人,29%是黑人,10%是西班牙裔。尽管21%(n=10)的参与者在儿童种族IAT上没有种族偏见,但大多数参与者都有从弱到强的隐性亲白人偏见(n=29%和60%)。其余参与者有从弱到强的隐性亲黑人偏见(n=9%和19%)。相比之下,95%的参与者表示对白人或黑人儿童没有明确的种族偏好。此外,我们还询问了参与者对幼儿差异来源的看法、知识和信念。偏见知识可用于制定战略,以减轻偏见并减少儿童保育环境中的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Racial bias toward children in the early childhood education setting
Racial disparities in the education setting are well-documented, including suspensions and expulsion for Black children beginning in pre-school. Racial bias has been hypothesized as a factor contributing to these disparities. However, little is known about the racial attitudes that childcare educators and staff have toward children. To describe levels of implicit and explicit racial bias toward children among early childhood educators, we measured implicit pro-White/anti-Black racial bias of teachers and staff from three urban childcare centers using the Child Race Implicit Association Test (IAT). Explicit bias was measured using a racial preference scale. Of the 48 participants in this sample, 56% were White, 29% Black, and 10% Hispanic. Although 21% (n = 10) of participants had no racial bias on the Child Race IAT, most had implicit pro-White bias ranging from weak to strong (n = 29%and 60%). The remaining participants had implicit pro-Black bias ranging from weak to strong (n = 9%and 19%). In contrast, 95% of participants reported no having no explicit racial preferences toward White or Black children. Additionally, we asked participants about perceptions, knowledge, and beliefs about sources of early childhood disparities. Knowledge of bias can be used in developing strategies to mitigate bias and reduce disparities in childcare settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Early Childhood Research
Journal of Early Childhood Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Early Childhood Research provides an international forum for the dissemination of early childhood research which transcends disciplinary boundaries and applies theory and research within academic and professional communities. The journal reflects international growth in research on young children’s learning and development and the impact of this on provision. The journal enjoys a wide readership which includes policy-makers, practitioners and researchers in the intersecting fields of early childhood education and care, with early childhood defined as the years from birth to eight.
期刊最新文献
‘Maybe that makes a difference actually’: Attuning to praxis for anti-racist social justice leadership among nursery school head teachers in the UK A model for play in the preschool curriculum: A phenomenological study Skin deep: A review of early childhood policy affordances for anti-racist practice in England and Scotland Before race: A literature review on de/colonial habits in play within early childhood Playing with open-ended material as experiences of democracy: The Waldorf case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1